Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-06-01 Thread bruis via KRnet
... Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Kayak via KRnet Date: 2/06/2017 8:29 am (GMT+12:00) To: Kenneth Wiltrout , KRnet Cc: Kayak Subject: Re: KR> N 133RM wings something sounds really not right there... On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kenn

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-06-01 Thread Kayak via KRnet
something sounds really not right there... On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kenneth Wiltrout via KRnet wrote: > FYI, When I spoke to Roy at OSH back in the 90's he told me the reason for > the tape was that on the way to OSH he did a loop and over stressed the wings > to the point that the wrink

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-06-01 Thread Kenneth Wiltrout via KRnet
KRnet To: KRnet Cc: Roy Keller Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 1:28 PM Subject: KR> N 133RM wings     In reference to this post by bruis---via KRnet. >>> For the record, the Roy Marsh KR2S wings measure 7’3” from hinge bolt hole to tip, with almost full width aileron...9” shor

KR> N 133RM wings

2017-06-01 Thread Roy Keller via KRnet
In reference to this post by bruis---via KRnet. >>> For the record, the Roy Marsh KR2S wings measure 7’3” from hinge bolt hole to tip, with almost full width aileron...9” shorter than the wing. They are somewhat tapered, to my surprise. Tape shows 4’ wide at the hinge plane, and 35” at the

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-05-28 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet
Bruce wrote: >> No i didn't include that. Do they measure the area directly between the leading and trailing edges of wings? Cant see it contributing much to lift at low angles of attack but hey..if that's the accepted convention! In this case it would at about 16 sq ft...<< Yep, leading to

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-05-28 Thread bruis via KRnet
smartphone. Original message From: Mark Langford via KRnet Date: 28/05/2017 10:56 pm (GMT+12:00) To: KRnet Cc: Mark Langford Subject: Re: KR> N 133RM wings Bruce wrote: >> Interestingly when i calculate that prototype krs2 wing area based on my measurements including w

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-05-28 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet
Bruce wrote: >> Interestingly when i calculate that prototype krs2 wing area based on my measurements including wing roots..it came out as only 58 sq ft cf the 88 quoted in the original flight test article in kitplane mag . Possibly that was a typo..but they then based wingloading calc on the

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-05-28 Thread bruis via KRnet
: Hendrik van Rooyen Subject: Re: KR> N 133RM wings Hi all, Thank you so much for the valuable information. I really appreciate your feedback. Kind regards, Hennie -Original Message- From: KRnet [mailto:krnet-boun...@list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of bruis--- via KRnet Sent: Sunday, 28

Re: KR> N 133RM wings

2017-05-27 Thread Hendrik van Rooyen via KRnet
...@xtra.co.nz Subject: KR> N 133RM wings For the record, the Roy Marsh KR2S wings measure 7’3” from hinge bolt hole to tip, with almost full width aileron...9” shorter than the wing. They are somewhat tapered, to my surprise. Tape shows 4’ wide at the hinge plane, and 35” at the tips, wh

KR> N 133RM wings

2017-05-27 Thread bruis--- via KRnet
For the record, the Roy Marsh KR2S wings measure 7’3” from hinge bolt hole to tip, with almost full width aileron...9” shorter than the wing. They are somewhat tapered, to my surprise. Tape shows 4’ wide at the hinge plane, and 35” at the tips, which are upturned slightly at the trailing edge