Chris Prata wrote:
> Are all/some of these articles available someplace
See http://aerofoilengineering.com/KR/sportaviation/kr_SA.htm for most
of these articles. Thanks to Don Reid for providing these many years
ago. He's now an aerodynamacist, in addition to being a nuclear
engineer.
more specific
questions you want to
ask, I'd be happy to do more summarizing.
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 15:44:41 -0700
> To: laser147 at juno.com; krnet at list.krnet.org
> Subject: Re: KR> KR Article
> From: krnet at list.krnet.org
>
>
>
> So not much !
>
So not much !
--
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 2:56 PM PDT Mike Stirewalt via KRnet wrote:
>Sparky let me go through his library of KR magazine articles a few years
>ago and I scanned them all. The KR has been written about a lot over the
>years. This is by no means a com
Sparky let me go through his library of KR magazine articles a few years
ago and I scanned them all. The KR has been written about a lot over the
years. This is by no means a comprehensive list.
Probably the best and most current coverage of the KR is the Sport
Aviation issue of December 2006.
. My experience so far has been write it and they will
come.
Original Message
Subject: Re: KR> KR article
From: Mark Langford via KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Fri, March 27, 2015 9:22 am
To: "KRnet"
It's worth pointing out that conventional wi
I got a nice email back from Paul Dye inviting me to send him something
more along the lines of how to make building easier, what doesn't work,
which mods make the most sense, and making it a more efficient
plane...that sort of thing. He likes to leave flight reports up to
people with no "dog
KRnet
Date:03/27/2015 11:22 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> KR
article
It's worth pointing out that conventional wisdom has been that plans-built
airplanes, along with "minimally" supported kitplanes, do not earn Kitplanes
a lot of advertising revenue (if ANY
It's worth pointing out that conventional wisdom has been that plans-built
airplanes, along with "minimally" supported kitplanes, do not earn Kitplanes
a lot of advertising revenue (if ANY at this point), so there is not a huge
incentive on their part to devote copy space to it. At the very least
If the article points people toward krnet.org in order to follow up on
their interest, then I think the article has served a major purpose.
Chris
On 3/27/2015 10:22 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:
> It's worth pointing out that conventional wisdom has been that plans-built
> airplanes, along
9 matches
Mail list logo
