com
> To: kr...@mylist.net
> Subject: Re: KR> C.G. location / flying qualities
> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:14:34 +1000
>
> NO only with the KR's, as most will tell you, with a header tank as
> standard, the C of G moves to far aft when all the plans COG is used and it
>
: www.WealthManagementCanada.com
-Original Message-
From: phillip matheson [mailto:phillipmathe...@bigpond.com]
Sent: April 5, 2010 4:15 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> C.G. location / flying qualities
NO only with the KR's, as most will tell you, with a header tank as
standard, the C of G move
NO only with the KR's, as most will tell you, with a header tank as
standard, the C of G moves to far aft when all the plans COG is used and it
is very dangerous.
Phil Matheson
SAAA Ch 20
www.phils...@50megs.com
For many design's that doesn't leave much travel & an Enforcement headache.
ie: Fuselage tank"Sir, how much gas did you take-off with"
CldLk-Tim
- Original Message -
From: "phillip matheson"
In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2
inches of t
Is that just with KR's or in general?
Tony King
Brisbane Australia
On 31 March 2010 15:44, phillip matheson wrote:
> In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2
> inches of the C of G for safety concerns.
>
> Phil Matheson
> SAAA Ch 20
> www.phils...@50megs.com
>
>
>
In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2
inches of the C of G for safety concerns.
Phil Matheson
SAAA Ch 20
www.phils...@50megs.com
At 07:33 AM 3/30/2010, you wrote:
>What effect if any does the engine have on flying a KR-2 with 2 people? You
>would think that a larger engine like an 0-200 would bring the CG forward more
>as opposed to an Volkswagon 1853.
>How does the wing design effect the flying characteristics with 2 peopl
7 matches
Mail list logo
