Colin Rainey wrote:
>> Unfortunately I have to agree with the local jurisdiction on their
>> decision to prohibit the repair and construction of cars, trucks, and now
>> light aircraft outside of a building and the storage of such items in
>> side or backyards, regardless of its intended use.<<
t;
>Reply-To: KRnet
>To: "'KRnet'"
>Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws LONG
>Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:34:15 -0700
>
>Well Colin, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Mine is that
>laws such as this is where we all have had our
...@bellsouth.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:12 PM
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws
Netters
Unfortunately I have to agree with the local jurisdiction on their decision
to prohibit the repair and construction of cars, trucks, and now light
aircraft outside o
--- Mark Langford wrote:
> Now you can't build or even change the oil in an
> airplane AT ALL!
One man's junk is another man's treasure.
I can' tell you how many flaming idiots who start a
car project, only to leave it rusting inthe yard for
ten years, will tell you that they are in the pr
Building an airplane is considered by many to be a form of artwork. Where is
our freedom of expression??
Mike Turner
Jackson Mo
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Kraut"
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:37 PM
Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anythi
I don't think I made myself clear enough in my last post. They are talking
about not doing any maintenance or building an aircraft EVEN INSIDE AN
ENCLOSED BUILDING, LIKE INSIDE YOUR GARAGE! That doesn't bother anybody?
You can argue all day that some guy may be making all kinds of annoying
no
Scott:
That may be but the way it is written your son could not even buildan r/c
model airplane are air-boat. I call that overly broad and unreasonable.
Most places would define a car as junk if it were not licensed and
unkempt. and most that have such ordinances have as a tool to remediate a
pro
true. Everyone's feelings are valid and
admirable. But they must be directed to the parts of the law that are wrong and
have it amended to allow freedom with an enclosure.
Colin
N96TA
>
> From: "Mark Langford"
> Date: 2006/07/18 Tue PM 09:42:51 EDT
> To: &qu
Colin Rainey wrote:
>>Please do not mis-understand: I am not saying Brian or any one else is
>>wrong. BUT, if what you are doing, falls into the criteria of code
>>violation, those laws have been in effect for many years and have been
>>affirmed by courts all over the US. <<
You may have misse
--- Mark Langford wrote:
> You may have missed the fact that this law was not
> "in effect for many
> years", but was enacted in the last week or so,
> especially to deal with
> Brian,
Again, I'd like to hear the other side of the story.
If Brian has several airplane projects in his yard,
a
If they want to have that much control of your property thay need to be
paying your mortgage , its that simple.
Jim
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:36:55 -0500 "Mark Langford"
writes:
> I don't think I made myself cl
Perhaps the Jacksonville City Fathers should consider relocation to China
or Russia where they would feel right at home and the people would be more
receptive to their dictatorial policies?
Been to Russia so I know where from I speak!
Don Lively
Burlington IA
--
There is another interresting part in the ordinances. The two parts seem to
contradict each other. I established a right (by court order) to construct
airplanes at my home before the ordinance. Any lawyers out there care to
interpret this one?\
Sec. 1.108. Code does not affect prior offenses
YES,. now can we please keep this quiet so the law makers in my town wont catch
on. Maybe everyone needs to write the Jacksonville mayor. If they come up
with this law in my town I will have to build a private room under my house
just like the hidden "SPEAK EASY'S" during prohibition.
Steven
ff airport circumstance, I
guess that constitutes their decision so it will be interesting to see
what EAA says.
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On
Behalf Of D F Lively
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:00 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR&
The RV list has already contacted the EAA attorney who volunteered to work
with the Jacksonville attorney drafting the final ordinance. Seems the RV'er
had some pull. More to follow.
BTW, a member of the RV list in Jacksonville already contacted a
representative from the local gov. who relayed
-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On
Behalf Of Mark Jones
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:37 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws
Guys,
You know this really pi$$es me off just as much as the rest of you but
off the hip comments do nothing
I like your point of view.
Ronald R. Eason Sr.
Pres. & CEO, KCMO Office
J.R.L. Engineering Consortium Ltd.
816-468-4091, Kansas City, MO.
Web Page: www.jrl-engineering.com
-- Original Message --
From: "Steve Glover"
Reply-To: KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list
gineering.com
To: kr...@mylist.net
Sent: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws LONG
I like your point of view.
Ronald R. Eason Sr.
Pres. & CEO, KCMO Office
J.R.L. Engineering Consortium Ltd.
816-468-4091, Kansas City, MO.
Web Page: www.jrl-engineering.com
9:27 AM
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws
The RV list has already contacted the EAA attorney who volunteered to work
with the Jacksonville attorney drafting the final ordinance. Seems the RV'er
had some pull. More to follow.
BTW, a member of the RV
; ---Original Message---
> From: R. Eason Sr.
> Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws LONG
> Sent: 19 Jul '06 16:12
>
> I like your point of view.
>
> Ronald R. Eason Sr.
> Pres. & CEO, KCMO Office
> J.R.L. Engineering Cons
I think I agree with the thread that you cannot create
an eyesore that may affect values but that it does
cross the line when you have an enclosed project. I
currently have 2 VW's that do not work (a 63 and a 67)
in my garage and it is nobody's business but mine what
I do in my garage. In my neig
welcome to e-mail off list.
Regards,
Steve Glover
KR-2 N902G
AJO, Ca
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On
Behalf Of michaela
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:22 PM
To: KRnet
Subject: RE: KR> Anti junk/disabled anything laws L
e-mail off list.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve Glover
> KR-2 N902G
> AJO, Ca
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On
> Behalf Of michaela
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:22 PM
Netters
Unfortunately I have to agree with the local jurisdiction on their decision to
prohibit the repair and construction of cars, trucks, and now light aircraft
outside of a building and the storage of such items in side or backyards,
regardless of its intended use.
In cities like Jacksonvil
e better things to do.
Regards,
Steve Glover
KR-2 N902G
AJO, Ca
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On
Behalf Of beverlyrai...@bellsouth.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:12 PM
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: KR> Anti junk/disabled anyth
26 matches
Mail list logo
