total of .250
ajustment to make the outboard waf side between the inboard waf.?
Paul ViskBelleville Il618-406-4705
Original message From: jon kimmel via KRnet Date: 8/19/2015 7:01 AM (GMT-06:00) To: KRnet Cc: jon kimmel Subject: Re: KR> "new"
airfoil sweep
I d
I didn't mean to imply there is anything wrong with the templates. I
really appreciate the templates. ..I am using the as 5048 templates
myself. I was just answering the question about what they do to the cg
range and how easily that range can be changed. My spar caps are thick
enough that I thi
Jon Kimmel wrote:
>>Unfortunately the reduction in sweep changes the location of the
mac. I did the calculations a few months ago...and I can't decipher my
post it notes...but the change moves the usable check range forward
about a
half inch. <<
These airfoil templates were drawn up at a time whe
I understand the reason...it is a great thing to have the laminar flow
airfoil. Unfortunately the reduction in sweep changes the location of the
mac. I did the calculations a few months ago...and I can't decipher my
post it notes...but the change moves the usable check range forward about a
half
Duh...504x, not 405x! At least I got RAF48 right.
For more on this airfoil, including free template download, see
http://www.krnet.org/as504x/
Mark Langford
ML at N56ML.com
http://www.n56ml.com
Jon Kimmel wrote:
>> Something I found interesting with the new airfoil is that it
looks like the sweep is different than what is in the plans.<<
The sweep is different because the airfoil shapes (AS405x and RAF48) are
different with regards to thickness vs coordinates, so to make the
airfoil f
6 matches
Mail list logo
