NetHeads,
A few weeks ago we had a discussion (maybe more of a debate) on what paperwork
was required after putting a new engine in an experimental plane, like I did
last weekend. I'm not sure that we ever answered it definitively. This week I
called the FSDO and asked them, and although it
>
>"After incorporating a major change as described in FAR 21.93, the
>aircraft owner is required to re-establish compliance with FAR
>91.319(b) and notify the geographically responsible FSDO of the
>location of the proposed test area. The aircraft owner must obtain
>concurrence from the FSDO
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: KR> "fly-off" period after engine change
>
> >
> >"After incorporating a major change as described in FAR 21.93, the
> >aircraft owner is required to re-establish compliance with FA
Mark and Netters,
The nutshell version he gave you sounds about right. Just swapping out a
'vair for a 'vair shouldn't have much impact on the flight characteristics you
established during your testing period.
There are a few more chapters and verse that apply, depending if the
aircraft was
After reading one of John Yodice stories about someone the FAA and then
NTSB put it to, if you change even a washer on your plane and you hold
the A&P for the plane (builder) you are better off to bit the bullet and
ask the FSDO if you need a new fly-off period and do it if who every
answer the
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: KR> "fly-off" period after engine change
43.5 Approval for return to service after maintenance, preventive
maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration states "No person may approve for
return to
service any aircraft, airframe, aircraft
In a message dated 3/2/2007 7:59:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
markweg...@charter.net writes:
has been made;
(b) doesn't apply to expiremental
---
Netters,
Sorry, I just put "doesn't apply to expiremental" because the a
Netters,
True statement Dave.
And it make a good case for CYA. Whenever I'm dealing with he
"administrator" I like to follow-up with a e-mail confirming the conversation
and print
off both the my letter and the answer and I tuck them in the file cabnet. The
idea being make sure you have f
Thanks for the clarification... I'm not as confused now
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf
Of eclarse...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 8:30 AM
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: Re: KR> "fly-off" period after
Unless I was told wrong 43. anything doe's not apply to your homebuilt
airplane UNLESS you are running a certified engine and then all FAR's,AD's
and such apply.I think Mark L hit the nail on the head with the part about
using good judgement and staying close to a safe landing spot for the first
All the FARs, ADs etc. ONLY APPLY if you WANT To KEEP
the engine CERTIFIED..
Ron
--- Bob Glidden wrote:
> Unless I was told wrong 43. anything doe's not apply
> to your homebuilt
> airplane UNLESS you are running a certified engine
> and then all FAR's,AD's
> and such apply.I think Mark L hi
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 03/02/07 16:13:09
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> "fly-off" period after engine change
All the FARs, ADs etc. ONLY APPLY if you WANT To KEEP
the engine CERTIFIED..
Ron
Larry Flesner said: Seems to me a simple log entry as to the engine change
would suffice
and go fly. I suspect that there are no two people in the FSDO/s or
DAR's that will interpret the reg's the same.
Don't forget that almost ANY change that could, not does effect flight
characteristics (we use
13 matches
Mail list logo
