"Will the authorities not allow you to test you aircraft to determine if it
meets the requirements. It seems absurd that they disqualify your KR based on
information from a totally different airplane and even yours with a
non-calibrated and questionable ASI system not even knowing the temp and
I've definitely got things against my embezzler ex wife.
Jg
> Nothing against ex wives but hey.
>
> Larry Flesner
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> KRnet@list.krnet.org
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>
>
--
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/ma
I'm saying based on my budget and 50 years experience in Experimental Aircraft, the reliability of aircraft engines is worth it to me.As for BRS, I'm not interested in hauling that weight around. Hull insurance also doesn't interest me. In my mind, my airplanes are toys. If one gets destroy
On 4/23/2023 2:35 AM, kiwi faulkner via KRnet wrote:
/*"This won't help you, as my KR1 buffets at 62 mph.(53 kts). Haven't
taken it into full stall yet. That was with retracts down. Plane is
pretty much to plans, tho heavy (785 lbs) as flown. "*/
Hi Kevin
On the contrary - the data that you
"This won't help you, as my KR1 buffets at 62 mph.(53 kts). Haven't taken it
into full stall yet. That was with retracts down. Plane is pretty much to
plans, tho heavy (785 lbs) as flown. "
Hi Kevin
On the contrary - the data that you present is extremely useful indeed - thank
you!
It is u
Hello Jeff, you wrote:
The days of a $10,000 overhaul for an aircraft engine are gone and this
> makes the Corvair a more attractive engine for planes like the KR. Would I
> go that route? No. But that's me and based on my experience and my
> budget. My opinion by no means should be construed
6 matches
Mail list logo
