On 9/10/2016 12:22 PM, Joel LaRock via KRnet wrote:
> Trying something different on my 6year old cell phone,let me know if I
> still screwed up or
Looks good Joel. Thank you for making the effort! :-)
-Dj
I would like to reaffirm all that is right and good about the aviation comunity.
There is so much good in aviation. ?Today as with most days, I have neighbors
and friends in aviation who will go out of thier way to help me achieve my
aviation goals both materially and with thier time. ?
You, my
Thanks
I'd hate to see this list eventually fail because of inadequate problem
solving when
this is so easy.
thoughts?
My "thoughts"?
If trimming replies . . . if adhering to common-sense email protocol is
an insurmountable problem . . . then these folks need to find a less
challenging hobby. I alm
I use usfamily.net for my email. There is a checkpoint that will
> delete the post you are answering, (check once and it works until you
> uncheck it. I highlight what I need and paste it in. I use usfamily for
> email only so it only costs 23.88 per year
Patrick Driscoll
Saint Paul, MN
patrick36 a
Trying something different on my 6year old cell phone,let me know if I
still screwed up or
At 02:53 PM 9/9/2016, you wrote:
> I just got off the phone with Donny from the restaurant at the
> airport. He will add the drinks for the buffets for free. That is a
> $2.00 savings. The only stipulation is that Larry has to bring his guitar.
Not sure of this, Mark probably knows, but a list like this is basically an
email address that receives mail and reflects it back out to a subscriber
list. This is what allows the contents to be archived and searchable. The
key here is how to manage search-ability. I agree, sometimes searching is a
hi mark,
thanks for sharing more of your experience. I am still contemplating the
process to get you a better experience and produce better integrity for the
archives which I have used numerous times. its an awesome resource.
so how about this, the text string produces a friendly repl
I think you have more weight than you need to achieve the required strength.
It only needs to be strong enough for the task, no more. Any more than that
means you're carrying weight (and sacrificing performance) you don't need to.
Cheers,
Tony
Sent from my iPad
> On 9 Sep 2016, at 10:15 PM,
correcting: rimming should say Trimming
From: KRnet on behalf of Chris Prata via
KRnet
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 10:14 PM
To: KRnet
Cc: Chris Prata
Subject: KR> Not rimming replies! - SOLUTION
I communicated in the background with others and this was the best solution. I
would add that there have been complaints that people are being "banned" for
being constructive. THIS IS NOT GOOD.
Note that the current approach is NOT WORKING. "Banning" people will simply
break the list communit
Chris Prata wrote:
>> I communicated in the background with others and this was the best
solution. I would add that there have been complaints that people are
being "banned" for being constructive. THIS IS NOT GOOD.<<
I'm guessing those "complaints" came from "Nero" and Doran. Yes, I
threw bot
13 matches
Mail list logo
