Efforts on porting to KF5

2016-03-03 Thread 4ernov
Hello, following some activity in the list I'd also like to inform that I'm currently working at some stuff to help porting Kopete to KF5. A couple of weeks ago I got in touch with R. Harish Navnit, who also keeps working on this, to prevent any redundancy in this area. Currently several commits m

Re: Kopete bugs in KF5

2016-03-14 Thread 4ernov
Seems that I obviously saw and fixed this issue (please, see the commit https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kopete.git&a=commit&h=0f259ada3a4646b0230d6870ff185adfcb3b1085). I just never suffered it in Kopete in KDE4 setup and thought it was due to some changes in KF5 or Qt5. Still, I think, it's easy to b

Re: Kopete bugs in KF5

2016-03-14 Thread 4ernov
o with last kdelibs version)... > > Anyway, you should subscribe to kopete-devel mailing list if you are not > already done it. > > On Monday 14 March 2016 12:26:21 4ernov wrote: >> Seems that I obviously saw and fixed this issue (please, see the >> commit

libiris update for kf5 branch

2016-03-28 Thread 4ernov
Hello, I'm trying to make Jabber protocol work in KF5 port, that's my next goal. I fixed several issues with CMake last weekend, but still there seem to be some problems with outdated version of libiris it just doesn't compile well against Qt5. Looks like it would require some patching, but a warn

Re: libiris update for kf5 branch

2016-03-29 Thread 4ernov
> Hi! Look into kopete git, master branch. 3 days ago I updated libiris to > last version from upstream project! So we definitely have up-to-date > version for jabber protocol. Oh, nice! Didn't look at master before writing. Yes, I'll try to cherry-pick these commits to kf5 and try it first. > If

[no subject]

2016-03-30 Thread 4ernov
> > Apart from that, how do you think, is it worth trying to still detach > > the library as an external dependency or we're better off sticking > > with current internal one? That's just in order to take a moment and > > make most major changes during this transfer now and not soon after > > the p

Re: libiris update for kf5 branch

2016-03-30 Thread 4ernov
2016-03-30 19:14 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > On Wednesday 30 March 2016 17:47:58 4ernov wrote: >> > > Apart from that, how do you think, is it worth trying to still >> > > detach the library as an external dependency or we're better off >> > > sticking wit

Jabber protocol porting

2016-06-05 Thread 4ernov
Hello, to add some little bit of positive news, I wanted to inform, that I've returned to Kopete porting and fix some issues in the Jabber protocol. I pushed the code to my clone of Kopete repo on GitHub to not push preliminary changes to main porting branch, so here's the code: https://github.com

Re: Jabber protocol porting

2016-06-08 Thread 4ernov
2016-06-07 10:26 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > On Monday 06 June 2016 02:51:35 4ernov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > to add some little bit of positive news, I wanted to inform, that I've > > returned to Kopete porting and fix some issues in the Jabber protocol. I > >

Suggestions on porting process of plugins and protocols

2016-06-19 Thread 4ernov
Hello, I continue to step by step porting plugins and protocols to KF5 and have several suggestions on the process. I think, most of things should be discussed with Pali, but anyone interested is welcomed to this discussion. 1. I found quite useful to port plugins in separate branches. This allow

Re: Suggestions on porting process of plugins and protocols

2016-06-26 Thread 4ernov
2016-06-22 14:41 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > Hi! > > On Sunday 19 June 2016 19:02:30 4ernov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I continue to step by step porting plugins and protocols to KF5 and have > > several suggestions on the process. I think, most of things should be &g

Re: Suggestions on porting process of plugins and protocols

2016-07-04 Thread 4ernov
2016-07-02 20:24 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > > On Sunday 26 June 2016 21:26:39 4ernov wrote: > > 2016-06-22 14:41 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Sunday 19 June 2016 19:02:30 4ernov wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > >

Re: Suggestions on porting process of plugins and protocols

2016-07-04 Thread 4ernov
2016-07-03 18:38 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > On Sunday 03 July 2016 17:09:42 cyberb...@gmx.de wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wrote the history2 plugin long ago. Here a more complete >> explanation >> >> why I wrote it: >> > This is a copy of the old history plugin, but with so many changes, >> > that I created

Re: Kopete & KF5

2016-10-22 Thread 4ernov
Hello, Pali, Unfortunately, I didn't work at it since the previous time we discussed new changes (the beginning of summer, I believe). So, the state of port is like: the main code is generally ported by Harish, I fixed a couple of plugins, so there's some other plugins remaining (as we've discusse

Re: Kopete & KF5

2016-11-05 Thread 4ernov
; > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 11:52 PM, R.Harish Navnit > wrote: >> Hi Pali, >> >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:30 PM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello, Pali, >>> >>> Unfortunately, I didn't work at it since the previous time we

Re: Kopete & KF5

2016-11-07 Thread 4ernov
sh to port also some not ported protocol. 2016-11-07 7:53 GMT+03:00 R.Harish Navnit : > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:11 AM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As promised, I've finished porting the plugins and protocols code we >> discussed in summer and pushed

Re: Kopete & KF5

2016-11-07 Thread 4ernov
2016-11-07 11:55 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > On Monday 07 November 2016 05:53:29 R.Harish Navnit wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:11 AM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > As promised, I've finished porting the plugins and protocols code &

Re: Kopete & KF5

2016-11-07 Thread 4ernov
2016-11-07 12:15 GMT+03:00 R.Harish Navnit : > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:35 PM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks, Harish. Actually we've discussed with Pali, which protocols >> would be useful to be ported and those which are more or less "alive" &g

Re: Kopete & KF5

2016-11-10 Thread 4ernov
2016-11-10 20:01 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár : > On Monday 07 November 2016 10:35:23 4ernov wrote: >> 2016-11-07 12:15 GMT+03:00 R.Harish Navnit : >> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:35 PM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks, Harish. Actually we've discussed