Hi to all,
> > My preference is the first option, someone are agree, someone are
> not agree.
> > The real and big obstacles again first option is:
> >-- Not all RDBMS support it o similar syntax
> > It works only on MySQL, Postgresql, Oracle.
>But not in compatible syntaxes. We are tal
On 10/12/2009 12:08 PM, Zeno Tajoli wrote:
> Hi to all,
> My preference is the first option, someone are agree, someone are not agree.
> The real and big obstacles again first option is:
>-- Not all RDBMS support it o similar syntax
> It works only on MySQL, Postgresql, Oracle.
But not i
I am for you adding the notes in the COMMENT in the basic SQL file -
so I too am for your first option.
Nicole
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Zeno Tajoli wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I'm sorry for not attending IIRC meeting of 07-Oct-2009, but I was outside.
> So, from last IIRC and now, the questi
Hi to all,
I'm sorry for not attending IIRC meeting of 07-Oct-2009, but I was outside.
So, from last IIRC and now, the question is:
>Do we insert the command 'COMMENT' in the basic definition SQL file,
>the file installer/data/mysql/kohastructure.sql ?
>Or do we insert the command 'COMMENT' in a
If Chris was accurate in saying that there was active pursuit of postgres
compatibility, then only the second option would make sense.
My own estimation is that pg-compatibility is so far from being implemented,
for most code it almost doesn't matter. By that, I mean that the database
representat
Hi to all,
as I said in the last IRC meeting,
http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2009-09-02#i_295862,
as CILEA we are working on mantain dcoumentation on Mysql tables,
indexeses and relations.
The work done until now is here:
http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?id=en:development:dbschema
The in
