Hi to all, > > My preference is the first option, someone are agree, someone are > not agree. > > The real and big obstacles again first option is: > > -- Not all RDBMS support it o similar syntax > > It works only on MySQL, Postgresql, Oracle. >But not in compatible syntaxes. We are talking about adding another >mysqlism into the database structure. >(Admitted localised to kohastructure.sql)
I think that now kohastructure.sql is a SQL file for MySQL. In fact the path is installer/data/MYSQL/kohastructure.sql If we create support for Postgresql in 3.2 we will create installer/data/PGSQL/kohastructure.sql And yes, we are speaking about DBIx::Class. Also DBIx::Class doesn't support 'COMMENT' >We probably need to review what our options are in the future for db >compatibility. Clearly this is connect with future for db compatibility. But I can confirm that CILEA will work on a different solution if we use DBIx::Class in 3.4 We don't need COMMENT in every DB definition for 3.2. Bye Zeno Tajoli CILEA - Segrate (MI) tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it (Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci quanto tra AT con @) _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
