On 10/12/2009 12:08 PM, Zeno Tajoli wrote: > Hi to all, > My preference is the first option, someone are agree, someone are not agree. > The real and big obstacles again first option is: > -- Not all RDBMS support it o similar syntax > It works only on MySQL, Postgresql, Oracle. But not in compatible syntaxes. We are talking about adding another mysqlism into the database structure. (Admitted localised to kohastructure.sql) > -- We want to use Class::DBI. Class::DBI doesn't support it Actually Chris was talking, I believe, about using DBIx::Class not Class::DBI. Using DBIx::Class does offer us more options in having a better defined schema.
We probably need to review what our options are in the future for db compatibility. Colin -- Colin Campbell Software Engineer, PTFS Europe Limited Content Management and Library Solutions +44 (0) 208 366 1295 (phone) +44 (0) 7759 633626 (mobile) colin.campb...@ptfs-europe.com skype: colin_campbell2 http://www.ptfs-europe.com _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
