On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:52:45 +0100 Schaich Alonso wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:27:52 +
> Max Brazhnikov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:10:01 +0100 Alberto Villa wrote:
> > > Isn't GCC 4.2 enough? It used to be.
> >
> > It claims that gcc=>4.5 and clang=>3.1 are sufficient. I have tes
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:27:52 +
Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:10:01 +0100 Alberto Villa wrote:
> > Isn't GCC 4.2 enough? It used to be.
>
> It claims that gcc=>4.5 and clang=>3.1 are sufficient. I have tested:
> gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
> gcc version 4.6.
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:10:01 +0100 Alberto Villa wrote:
> Isn't GCC 4.2 enough? It used to be.
It claims that gcc=>4.5 and clang=>3.1 are sufficient. I have tested:
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
gcc version 4.6.3 (FreeBSD Ports Collection)
FreeBSD clang version 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32
On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:06:17 + Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> SVN commit 9034 by makc:
>
> - Add dependence on soprano and nepomuk-core
> - kactivity manager needs decent compiler. Use gcc48 as temporary solution
> (bapt's goint to introduce USES= moderncompiler soon)
both gcc46 from lang/gcc and
Isn't GCC 4.2 enough? It used to be.
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
Il giorno 08/mar/2013 13:06, "Max Brazhnikov" ha scritto:
> SVN commit 9034 by makc:
>
> - Add dependence on soprano and nepomuk-core
> - kactivity manager needs decent compiler. Use gcc48
