On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:27:52 +0000 Max Brazhnikov <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:10:01 +0100 Alberto Villa wrote: > > Isn't GCC 4.2 enough? It used to be. > > It claims that gcc=>4.5 and clang=>3.1 are sufficient. I have tested: > gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] > gcc version 4.6.3 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) > FreeBSD clang version 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32/final 170710) 20121221 > gcc version 4.8.0 20130303 (experimental) (FreeBSD Ports Collection) > > only the last was good enough. I've put gcc48 to finish tinderbox builds, > don't consider it as a final decision. > I can build it with base clang over here, though I can't comment on whether the built programms work the way they're supposed to. Have you also tried gcc-4.7? (asking because 4.8 is still in Beta phase after all) If this version is to be commited to official ports, I think x11/kactivities should make a notice about the need to configure libmap.conf for the ports g++48 built things to work. Alonso _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
