On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:10:01 +0100 Alberto Villa wrote:
> Isn't GCC 4.2 enough? It used to be.
 
It claims that gcc=>4.5 and clang=>3.1 are sufficient. I have tested:
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
gcc version 4.6.3 (FreeBSD Ports Collection)
FreeBSD clang version 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32/final 170710) 20121221
gcc version 4.8.0 20130303 (experimental) (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 

only the last was good enough. I've put gcc48 to finish tinderbox builds, 
don't consider it as a final decision.

> Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avi...@freebsd.org>
> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
> Il giorno 08/mar/2013 13:06, "Max Brazhnikov" <m...@freebsd.org> ha scritto:
> 
> > SVN commit 9034 by makc:
> >
> > - Add dependence on soprano and nepomuk-core
> > - kactivity manager needs decent compiler. Use gcc48 as temporary solution
> >   (bapt's goint to introduce USES= moderncompiler soon)
> > - Update plist for 4.10.1
> >
> >
> >  M  +6 -2      Makefile
> >  M  +34 -1     pkg-plist
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-freebsd mailing list
> > kde-freebsd@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
> > See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
> >
_______________________________________________
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information

Reply via email to