> On March 3, 2015, 2:21 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote:
> > OK, sounds good.
Thanks, I don't have commit access. Can you push this change? Thanks again.
- Maximiliano
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://gi
Hi Michael,
On 03 Mar 2015, at 03:30 , Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Mon, March 2, 2015 20:15:20 Marko Käning wrote:
>> So, having those ktp-* entries in dependency-data-stable-kf5-qt5 shouldn’t
>> do any harm.
>>
>> But I don’t know how kdesrc-build will handle this, though...
>
> For missing en
On Mon, March 2, 2015 21:22:32 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 20:49:45, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> > Makes me think that maybe the review process does not work that well...
>
> Correct, the review process doesn't work well at all, and hasn't been for a
> long t
On Mon, March 2, 2015 20:15:20 Marko Käning wrote:
> So, having those ktp-* entries in dependency-data-stable-kf5-qt5 shouldn’t
> do any harm.
>
>But I don’t know how kdesrc-build will handle this, though...
For missing entries kdesrc-build will infer "master" as the git branch to use.
It wo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122764/#review76935
---
Ship it!
OK, sounds good.
- Michael Pyne
On Feb. 28, 2015,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122733/#review76933
---
Ship it!
Very nice. :)
- Sebastian Kügler
On Feb. 26, 2015
> On March 2, 2015, 10:30 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > That sounds like a bug in the qml engine to me: "The QML engine provides
> > automatic type conversion between QVariantList and JavaScript arrays[…]"
> > and I haven't seen any issues with the conversion. Did you try QStringList?
I did
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122741/#review76927
---
That sounds like a bug in the qml engine to me: "The QML engin
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi Aleix,
>
> after adding a few dependencies:
> ---
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5 b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
> index 7cf844f..2a303d4 100644
> --- a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
> +++ b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
> @@ -1002,6 +100
El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 20:49:45, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 01:47:00, Martin Klapetek va
escriure:
> > > I would just like to point out that the review period of KPeople
> > > is ov
Hi Aleix,
after adding a few dependencies:
---
$ git diff
diff --git a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5 b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
index 7cf844f..2a303d4 100644
--- a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
+++ b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
@@ -1002,6 +1002,12 @@ playground/base/kio-mtp: frameworks/ki18n
playground/base/kio-m
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 01:47:00, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> > I would just like to point out that the review period of KPeople
> > is over and all the associated moves are in order, are they not?
> > What exactly is "eno
El Dilluns, 2 de març de 2015, a les 01:47:00, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> I would just like to point out that the review period of KPeople
> is over and all the associated moves are in order, are they not?
> What exactly is "enormously rushed" when the review period
> is over and moves are righ
Well, Luigi, this is what the logical deps say:
---
"extragear/network/telepathy/*": {
"stable-qt4": "kde-telepathy-0.9",
"latest-qt4": "kde-telepathy-0.9"
},
"kde/kdenetwork/ktp*": {
"stable-qt4": "kde-telepathy-0.9",
"latest-
> On mar. 2, 2015, 8:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
Hi,
On 02 Mar 2015, at 19:14 , Luigi Toscano wrote:
> This should really be solved somehow in a more clear way, if I'm not
> misunderstanding all the process: there is no stable version of ktp right now
> for kf5.
yes, I guess so.
If there is no stable version for it, it shouldn’t appear in t
On Monday 02 of March 2015 19:08:57 Marko Käning wrote:
> We need to remember that the stable-kf5-qt5 branch group needs to be kept in
> sync whenever updating kf5-qt5… I committed the still missing info for it
> in [1].
This should really be solved somehow in a more clear way, if I'm not
misunde
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122741/#review76914
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Eike Hein
On Feb. 27, 2015, 3:14 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122741/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 6:14 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
We need to remember that the stable-kf5-qt5 branch group needs to be kept in
sync
whenever updating kf5-qt5… I committed the still missing info for it in [1].
Greets,
Marko
[1]
http://commits.kde.org/kde-build-metadata/1aa3609df9b3b513c4fd555d38cb3d047f4e3c03
_
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122779/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kio
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122774/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 4:34 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122775/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 4:34 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122776/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 4:34 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122775/#review76905
---
Ship it!
Inviala!
- Luca Beltrame
On Mar. 2, 2015, 2:50 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122774/#review76906
---
Ship it!
Oops, copy-paste error on my part... thanks for spot
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122776/#review76904
---
+1 from me, given I touched this code recently.
- Luca Beltra
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122774/#review76895
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On March 2, 2015, 3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122776/#review76892
---
Ship it!
How hard would it be to get an autotest? :D
- Aleix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122775/#review76893
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On March 2, 2015, 3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122775/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 2:50 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
S
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122776/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdeclarative
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122775/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdeclarative
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122774/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdeclarative
Description
On March 2, 2015, 5:21 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> > Should we be using ::tr here instead of not translating at all?
>
> Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Consensus on IRC six days ago was that dropping translation altogether
> was fine.
> I can add some ::tr but it's arguable whether some
> On March 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
> On mar. 2, 2015, 8:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think CI still needs something like this:
> ---
> $ git diff
> diff --git a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5 b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
> index 3731ec6..6005971 100644
> --- a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
> +++ b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
> @@ -241,6
> On March 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122706/#review76873
---
+1
- David Edmundson
On Feb. 25, 2015, 5:40 p.m., Marco Mar
> On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
> On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
> On March 2, 2015, 8:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>
> On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
>
> (personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but
> that's another discussion)
Sorry, there is also anothe
> On Mar. 2, 2015, 9:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Ship It!
Please fix the extracted pot so that it is called _qt.pot.
(personally speaking, I would strongly suggest lxde to use ki18n, but that's
another discussion)
- Luigi
---
T
On Mar. 2, 2015, 5:21 a.m., Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> > Should we be using ::tr here instead of not translating at all?
>
> Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Consensus on IRC six days ago was that dropping translation altogether
> was fine.
> I can add some ::tr but it's arguable whether some o
Hi,
I think CI still needs something like this:
---
$ git diff
diff --git a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5 b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
index 3731ec6..6005971 100644
--- a/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
+++ b/dependency-data-kf5-qt5
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@ frameworks/plasma-framework: frameworks/kwindowsystem
framew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122770/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kwindowsystem
Descriptio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/#review76863
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Martin Gräßlin
On March 2, 2015, 9:02
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated March 2, 2015, 8:02 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Mar
50 matches
Mail list logo
