On Saturday 19 January 2013 12:21:57 David Faure wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Can you shed some light on the intent of this famous test?
>
> s->write(HTTPREQUEST);
> s->waitForReadyRead();
> s->close();
> //What happens is that during waitForReadyRead() the write buffer is
> written o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108560/#review26082
---
tier2/kconfig/autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108560/
---
(Updated Jan. 23, 2013, 6:14 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Ch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108560/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 10:13 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
C
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2013 21:09:59 you wrote:
>> - RMB context menu
>> - App wide shortcuts
>> - Clipboard integration..
>
> these are all being worked on.
Gladly :) But as said.. Qt 5.2 or even 5.3 material. Certainly not 5.1.
>
>> In my
On Monday, January 21, 2013 21:09:59 you wrote:
> - RMB context menu
> - App wide shortcuts
> - Clipboard integration..
these are all being worked on.
> In my DirModel i took a good close look at the current DisplayRole
> stuff. It was a blocking call that could potentially slow the
> interface d
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:07:50PM +0100, Jon Severinsson wrote:
> On the other hand, debian testing (KDE 4.8 etc.) still shows 36 packages
> still requiring it, so that deprecation notice has obviously not been taken
> all too seriously.
>From looking at the list, it doesn't seem like any of them
