https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383010
--- Comment #68 from Julian Seward ---
Created attachment 144930
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=144930&action=edit
valgrind-avx512-rollup-fixes-2021Dec29.diff
Rollup fixes to be applied on top of (after) the patches in comments
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383010
--- Comment #70 from Julian Seward ---
Created attachment 145020
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=145020&action=edit
Fix handling of no-mask reg-reg versions of VEXPAND* and VCOMPRESS*
Here's a bug fix for the VEXPAND a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413547
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431556
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment #3 from Julian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431556
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #0)
> Created attachment 133458 [details]
> Functional support for ISA 3.1, New Iops
>
> Power PC missing ISA 3.1 support. Additional patches, part 7
It seems to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429352
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #1)
> Created attachment 133459 [details]
> Test cases for new IOps
>
> The test cases
This seems OK to be. But per comments on
https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407244
Julian Helfferich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432161
--- Comment #3 from Julian Seward ---
Nicely done! I did spot one bug though:
@@ -3752,6 +3775,8 @@ IRAtom* expr2vbits_Binop ( MCEnv* mce,
case Iop_I32StoF32x4:
case Iop_F32toI32Sx4:
+ case Iop_Sqrt16Fx8:
+ return
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432161
--- Comment #6 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to ahashmi from comment #5)
Looks good to me. Land!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423057
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423195
--- Comment #7 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #2)
> Created attachment 130173 [details]
> Add check for isa 3.1 support
>
> 0001-Add-check-for-isa-3.1-support.patch
>
> Adds base support for detecting IS
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423195
--- Comment #8 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #3)
> Created attachment 130174 [details]
> Adds the support for prefix instructions
>
> 0002-ISA-3.1-Instruction-Prefix-Support.patch
>
> Adds the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423195
--- Comment #10 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #4)
> Created attachment 130175 [details]
> Add prefixed support for the following word
>
> 0003-ISA-3.1-Add-prefixed-support-for-the-following-word-.patch
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423195
--- Comment #9 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #3)
> Created attachment 130174 [details]
> Adds the support for prefix instructions
>
> 0002-ISA-3.1-Instruction-Prefix-Support.patch
>
> Adds the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423195
--- Comment #11 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #5)
> Created attachment 130176 [details]
> Initial load and store instruction tests
>
> 0004-Initial-ISA-3.1-instruction-tests.patch
>
> Testsuite for new
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424784
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424784
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425570
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|20.04.3 |20.08.0
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425431
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@xyquadrat.ch
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425455
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425259
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425390
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425542
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@xyquadrat.ch
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425455
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |FIXED
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425652
Bug ID: 425652
Summary: Directory path with dot leads to failing MacOS builds
Product: frameworks-kwindowsystem
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: macOS
Status: REPO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425734
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@xyquadrat.ch
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436411
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment #3 from Julian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436873
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsew...@acm.org
--- Comment #2 from Julian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435665
--- Comment #9 from Julian Seward ---
So .. I had an idea about how to get the annotations right. Problem is, it's a
nasty hack (although simple), and I had hoped that the passage of a bit of time
would cause me to think of something cleaner.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437975
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@xyquadrat.ch
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437975
--- Comment #5 from Julian Steinmann ---
Here's my debug output: https://invent.kde.org/-/snippets/1684.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437975
--- Comment #8 from Julian Steinmann ---
I can confirm that after updating my system completely the issue is gone. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435665
--- Comment #11 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #10)
> Created attachment 138846 [details]
> PPC add copy, paste, cpabort support
>
> Updated patch to add the Memcheck trickery to get Memcheck to detect
> un
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435665
--- Comment #14 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho from comment #13)
> (In reply to Carl Love from comment #12)
> Correct. The address is always mmap'ed.
Ok. Then I think you're good to go as-is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436411
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to ahashmi from comment #4)
> Created attachment 138947 [details]
> Adds arm64 v8.2 scalar FABD, FACGE, FACGT and FADD instructions
That all looks fine; please land. Just before you do -- if you h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436873
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to ahashmi from comment #3)
> The review fixes for the scalar variants patch
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436411 (hwcaps-gating and
> iselIntExpr_RIL_wrk issues) means this latest pa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429864
--- Comment #1 from Julian Seward ---
Yes. There's a special Iop_CasCmpEQ{32,64} or some such, designed specifically
to deal with this problem. See libvex_ir.h for details.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407244
Julian Helfferich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a_...@gmx.com
--- Comment #2 from Julian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380462
Julian Helfferich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407244
Julian Helfferich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|ASSIGNED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407244
Julian Helfferich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|squall.leonhart.cai@gmail.c |julian.helfferich@mailbox.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
--- Comment #14 from Julian Seward ---
Thank you all for the high quality discussion and analysis. This looks
fine to me; please land.
One tiny nit .. please #undef get_cpu_ftr and get_ftr just before the
closing brace of the fn that defines them.
I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413547
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
Assad, am I right to understand that the comment 3 patch
has been made redundant by the comment 4 patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413547
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #133667|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413547
--- Comment #7 from Julian Seward ---
You can get to an "patch is obsolete" check box by following the twisty
maze attached to the "Details" link on the "Attachments" box.
Anyways, review comments.
This looks f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414268
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434193
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Mike Crowe from comment #4)
> It ain't half slow on anything more than toy test cases though. :)
That was a general test to establish whether lack of precise
instrumentation was indeed the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434193
--- Comment #6 from Julian Seward ---
Here's my proposed fix. It works for your test case on x86_64
but I didn't test it on arm64. Does it work for you?
diff --git a/memcheck/mc_translate.c b/memcheck/mc_translate.c
index 516988bdd..759f00
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432801
--- Comment #22 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Eyal from comment #21)
> Will anyone consider the patch?
This (problem) is definitely something I want to deal with, and your
patch seems like a good starting place. However, 3.17 is imminent an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434193
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401416
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #4)
> Is there a reason to remove them completely instead of keep using the if
> defined (...) constructs?
I had wondered that too. I'm trying the if-def
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401416
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380474
Julian Helfferich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434840
--- Comment #2 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Carl Love from comment #1)
Handing it off to the hardware via a helper function is the right
thing to do. But you can't use a clean helper for this; that breaks
the rules for clean helpers. A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430658
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@xyquadrat.ch
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430658
--- Comment #3 from Julian Steinmann ---
Hmm. It seems as if https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/merge_requests/530 is
the relevant commit / MR. The error message comes from
https://invent.kde.org/plasma/plasma-workspace/-/blob/master/libcolorcorrect
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430658
Julian Steinmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492074
Bug ID: 492074
Summary: Clock disappeared
Classification: Plasma
Product: plasma-mobile
Version: unspecified
Platform: postmarketOS
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492077
Bug ID: 492077
Summary: No way to maximize window
Classification: Plasma
Product: plasma-mobile
Version: unspecified
Platform: postmarketOS
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492077
--- Comment #1 from Julian Groß ---
One suggestion how this could be fixed: show a maximize button in the task
switcher if the window isn't maximized. I would suggest the top left, so it
isn't right next to the close button.
--
You are rece
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492108
Bug ID: 492108
Summary: Dolphin wrongly reports free disk space on fuse mount
(davfs2) as 0B and subsequently does not allow copying
any files into it
Classification: Applications
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488941
Julian Stauffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julian.stauffer...@gmail.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492077
--- Comment #3 from Julian Groß ---
(In reply to Luis B from comment #2)
> In which cases do non-maximized windows occur?
You can deliberately unmaximize a window using a key combination such as Super
+ LeftArrow, which I use regularly in school
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432801
--- Comment #17 from Julian Seward ---
Interesting analysis, and a plausible patch; thank you for that. This seems
like a new trick from LLVM.
I'm still struggling to understand what's going on, though. I can see that
for (size_t i = 0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432552
--- Comment #1 from Julian Seward ---
I suspect this can be fixed by finding the following at or near
line 4967 of guest_arm64_toIR.c
Bool earlyWBack
= wBack && simm9 < 0 && (szB == 8 || szB == 4)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429354
--- Comment #6 from Julian Seward ---
Thanks for the fixes. r+; please land.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432552
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[AArch64] invalid error |[AArch64] invalid error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432552
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #20 from Julian Seward ---
Looking at the end of the log there:
SYSCALL[279836,1](291) sys_newfstatat ( 24, 0x4a73980(), 0x4ad2578 )[sync] -->
Failure(0x9)
SYSCALL[279836,1](90) sys_mmap ( 0x0, 0, 1, 2, 24, 0 ) --> [pre-fail]
Failur
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430429
--- Comment #4 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #2)
@Andreas: if the patch works on s390, I think you should land it.
> @Julian: Isn't the patch necessary for other 64-bit platforms as well then?
> Such as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #23 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #22)
> So if thinks the open was a success with a negative file descriptor returned?
Ah, maybe it's trying to tell us something :-) I vaguely remember reading
that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431157
--- Comment #25 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Tom Hughes from comment #24)
> Indeed if that is -2 that would be errno 2 aka ENOENT which would make sense.
Agreed.
So then it would seem to me that the problem is that the patch doesn'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430429
--- Comment #6 from Julian Seward ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #5)
> Quick confirmation for amd64 Fedora. No problems with clang 11 or clang 13
Thanks.
(general comment, not suggesting any action right now): Looking at valgrind.h
now
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434193
--- Comment #3 from Julian Seward ---
Does running with --expensive-definedness-checks=yes make any difference?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162211
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400167
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|New button: LA (Last|Wish: Add a "Jump to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345817
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360142
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344110
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400423
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||triaged
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344110
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349778
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370335
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360424
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370441
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362416
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372666
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372441
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364391
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Version
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367737
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luke-jr+kdeb...@utopios.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369624
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juliquad...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365449
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372666
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Julian Schraner
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407451
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407446
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robin.lahti...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407446
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406256
--- Comment #8 from Julian Seward ---
Thanks for the respin. I have mostly only minor comments about it. Is OK to
land provided all the comments below are addressed, except for the one about
vectorising negateVF32, which would be nice to fix if you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407979
Julian Schraner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406256
Julian Seward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #119940|0 |1
is obsolete
201 - 300 of 3715 matches
Mail list logo
