https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466360
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432909
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432909
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432909
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham ---
Lee, if you are as experienced as you say you are, I am surprised that you did
not check up on a few things before going off at half-cock.
Firstly, Palapeli is part of the KDE Community software, which is all free
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432909
--- Comment #7 from Ian Wadham ---
So you are a hardware geek. Fine. I respect that.
C++ is only the first of several hurdles to conquer before you could make a
change to Palapeli. Software development has become a lot more formal and
controlled since
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424857
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
--- Comment #14 from Ian Wadham ---
Created attachment 130719
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130719&action=edit
False report of "Game cannot be won"
Saved KPatience game - can be used as a test case for this bug (2906
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
--- Comment #15 from Ian Wadham ---
Created attachment 130720
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130720&action=edit
Image of cards in the saved game - att. 130719
In this image, the 4 of Diamonds has just been played to a Foundati
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
--- Comment #16 from Ian Wadham ---
Created attachment 130721
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=130721&action=edit
Image of winnability of the saved game - att. 130719
This is an image of the same game as in image 130720, but about 2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425172
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425155
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425172
--- Comment #2 from Ian Wadham ---
*** Bug 425155 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464481
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham ---
I seem to remember that the card decks reside in a library. KPat is not the
only card game…
See https://invent.kde.org/games/libkdegames/-/blob/master/src/carddecks/README
> On 19 Jan 2023, at 10:44 pm,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447570
--- Comment #4 from Ian Wadham ---
Albert is right. The numbers shown are not a valid solution to a Jigsaw type of
puzzle.
But I think you might also be misunderstanding something about how to play
KSudoku.
In your first screenshot you seem to have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432063
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432063
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335303
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302140
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Assignee|co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302140
--- Comment #6 from Ian Wadham ---
There are further comments and attachments about this bug at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647#c5 and subsequent comments.
Unfortunately we did not realize that this "illegal moves" bug is a separ
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ckju...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351989
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saur...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374440
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
--- Comment #13 from Ian Wadham ---
I know how to fix this problem --- patches are being prepared.
Actually there are two problems. The first is where the Forty & Eight solver
fails to report both cards as possible moves when there are two card
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|co...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252855
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256935
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211850
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294238
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296474
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345515
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312267
--- Comment #9 from Ian Wadham ---
It has been some time since I wrote comment 5,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312267#c5, but I have not been able to
reproduce this bug nor have I been able to diagnose it by reading the code.
This bug and its
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384546
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Steve Soule from comment #2)
> Your demand that I reproduce the bug is not reasonable, since that would
> require a random number generator to produce precisely the same values as it
> did before
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384546
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384546
--- Comment #6 from Ian Wadham ---
Not at all, Steve. No worries. I enjoyed the challenge!
I was also a little worried that I might have left a time-limit in the
algorithm that checks that the solution is unique. It runs until all
possibilities are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333429
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411940
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404800
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham ---
Created attachment 118609
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118609&action=edit
Attempt to download and install Classic theme from KHNS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #7 from Ian Wadham ---
Hmmm! There have been some red herrings in these comments... :-)
The problem is literally as Giorgos describes. See the attached screenshot from
my Apple machine, running one of the last releases of KDE4 under
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #8 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #6)
> Ian, is that screenshot from running *today* ? Which version of kdiamonds ?
That was a screenshot from Applications release 4.14.3.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #10 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Aleix Pol from comment #9)
> The culprit seems to be this change:
> https://phabricator.kde.org/R394:3ffd35d9babae34d189446d9ba2a2a799412c080
>
> I can confirm that reverting it fixes it. Th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #11 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Ian Wadham from comment #5)
> Created attachment 118609 [details]
> Attempt to download and install Classic theme from KHNS
Re my attachment, after some experimentation (in the KDE4 version) I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405422
--- Comment #1 from Ian Wadham ---
I used to be maintainer/developer for KSudoku, but am out of touch with it now.
However I will try to help narrow this problem down.
The message you are getting seems to be from the "welcome" screen (where
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405422
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |VHI
Severity|normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405422
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Severity|major
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #13 from Ian Wadham ---
I'd suggest you remove newstuff support and transfer the files for the Classic
theme into the released theme-files for KDiamond. The Classic theme is from KDE
3 days after all and is not "new stuff" a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405029
--- Comment #17 from Ian Wadham ---
Abert and Luigi, supporting themes and hot new stuff is fine, but "build it and
they will come" depends on there being known and easy roads to it. Please be
assured that there is nothing silly or even si
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358496
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham ---
Or one could make it fail more gracefully, with popup "sorry" KMessageBox's for
each failure path and an invitation to try again... rather than showing just a
blank screen and an inconspicuous status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172926
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290647
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312267
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303059
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311948
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329640
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |UNMAINTAINED
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421713
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421713
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham ---
Created attachment 128605
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=128605&action=edit
Invalid moves in Tiny Killer puzzle
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421713
--- Comment #4 from Ian Wadham ---
In the attachment I added, line 2 as 1243 is invalid because it has two 2's in
the top left 2x2 grid and two 4's in the top right 2x2 grid, whereas 1423 in
line 2 leaves one occurrence of the four possible
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421713
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham ---
Hmmm... I see that the KSudoku Handbook is badly in need of an update to
document the puzzle types I added and explain the rules of the Killer and
Mathdoku types.
Sadly, I no longer have access to the KSudoku
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421753
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421713
--- Comment #6 from Ian Wadham ---
*** Bug 421753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421713
--- Comment #9 from Ian Wadham ---
Thank you very much for stepping up, Yuri. I will try to find some time
tomorrow (Friday) to write some paragraphs and send them to you by direct
email.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335565
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham ---
I was the maintainer of KJumpingCube for a while.
The code for these debugging messages can safely be commented out or deleted.
It was not my intention to leave it in. My apologies.
Alternatively, the code can be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348179
--- Comment #4 from Ian Wadham ---
I cannot test this. My machine does not have a numeric keypad, nor am I using a
Linux/KDE desktop.
Anyway, I retired from maintaining KDE games some time ago. Sorry I cannot
help.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391309
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391309
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham ---
OK,let us take this conversation out of Bugzilla for now. I will write to you
privately.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394256
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394260
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280092
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369206
--- Comment #4 from Ian Wadham ---
I think this may be a problem in KF5 or Qt5 message box implementation. Maybe
report it upstream.
Never happened in earlier version of KDE and Qt, except about 15 years ago when
ALL messages came out as one long line
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342626
--- Comment #2 from Ian Wadham ---
I think the request is for when you have to "guess" a number in a cell, rather
than deduce it logically. As you continue on, a wrong guess will lead to a
situation where there is no valid move. You th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229087
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=240947
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394601
--- Comment #4 from Ian Wadham ---
KSudoku is peculiar because it attempts to use the printer in a pseudo-on-line
mode, rather than spooled. It only "prints" a puzzle that is on the screen at
the moment, rather than everything that has gone b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373840
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261509
--- Comment #18 from Ian Wadham ---
See Jeremy Lavergne's original report of this bug on 2010-12-29.
AFAIK it has only ever occurred during large MacPorts builds, possibly/probably
on MacPorts servers that supply binaries and certainly on servers
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261509
--- Comment #20 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to RJVB from comment #19)
>> It's not uncommon at all for MacPorts ports to provide documentation through
> an optional variant, for package size considerations.
Meinproc4 provides onl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339993
--- Comment #4 from Ian Wadham ---
I am sure it would be OK to omit the %u and disable the implementation of the
filename parameter in the Palapeli source code. The original author has long
since left the KDE Games team and I have never felt a need for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375068
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Ian Wadham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497518
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365218
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Severity|normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366796
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366796
--- Comment #2 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Matthew Woehlke from comment #0)
> I'm not familiar enough with how palapeli is implemented, but it occurs to
> me the problem might be in the QGV frameworks? (In which case I'm happy to
&
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366796
--- Comment #5 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #4)
> Ian, while Palapeli has a KF5 port lingering at the frameworks branch, the
> released version is still KDE4 based. So hack ahead ;)
Thanks, I know that, but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366796
--- Comment #6 from Ian Wadham ---
@Matthew: I had a brief look at how Palapeli is handling selects. It is mostly
home-grown and could be changed, but I won't be fixing it. See my reply to
Christoph.
QAbstractItemView is part of the model
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366796
--- Comment #8 from Ian Wadham ---
@Stefan: There are now two more configurable mouse actions: teleport pieces and
switch to close-up or distant view. I followed the existing scheme, with
interactors, etc. because it seemed simpler to leave well
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337742
--- Comment #73 from Ian Wadham ---
(In reply to Stanislav Kravets from comment #72)
> The same bug in kubuntu 14.04.3, KDE 4.13.3
Please read comments #66 and after. The bug was fixed in version KDE
Applications/14.12.1, in January 2015, which c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363699
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353845
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358496
Ian Wadham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iandw...@gmail.com
Status|UNCONFIRMED
93 matches
Mail list logo
