Micheal,
I'm just catching up on some of my older e-mail. Please forgive me. :]
You wrote: "I think the only situation which may be a little confuse is when you
create a point just beside an existing isolated point : the new point is
snapped on the previous one and finally, you see only one point
Should be possible.
I dont't feel it is necessary, but I'm ok to search for a solution if
someone tells me : I tried to edit features in snapping mode and I find
it confusing when I create new points because This way, I'll be sure
it is worth looking for a better solution :-)
Michaël
Stef
In general i agree with you.
What may solve confusion is if we deliver a message like "point set" in
the info box, down left?
stefan
Michaël Michaud schrieb:
> Sunburned Surveyor a écrit :
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> What did you mean when you said "My experience is that it is more
>> confusing not to
Sunburned Surveyor a écrit :
>Michael,
>
>What did you mean when you said "My experience is that it is more
>confusing not to be able to snap points (snapping linestrings and
>polygons works just fine) than to have points snapped on another one."
>
>To what "another one" do you refer? A point on t
Michael,
What did you mean when you said "My experience is that it is more
confusing not to be able to snap points (snapping linestrings and
polygons works just fine) than to have points snapped on another one."
To what "another one" do you refer? A point on the grid, or a node on
a feature geome
