Hi,
as a note: when I create a plugin I am doing this via the mouse menu on
the source/project: choosing "export" and then select Java > JAR file.
So I am not using Ant for creating plugins.
stefan
Am 25.02.12 09:28, schrieb Landon Blake:
> Tanks for the tips Ede. I'm aware of the project speci
Tanks for the tips Ede. I'm aware of the project specific settings for
Java compilation in Eclipse. I was not aware of the setting for my Ant
build file. I will check that out.
Landon
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:47 AM, wrote:
> On 24.02.2012 23:54, Landon Blake wrote:
>> I'm building both with An
On 24.02.2012 23:54, Landon Blake wrote:
> I'm building both with Ant in Eclipse. The Super
> Select Tool plug-in loads just fine in OpenJUMP, while the GPX Reader
> plug-in throws a "Major Minor" version exception. (This happens when
> you run a class compiled with a JDK higher than the JRE runnin
On 25.02.2012 00:49, Landon Blake wrote:
> I set the "JDK Compliance" to 1.6 and 1.5, but that didn't make a
> difference either. (Is that what you meant by "target version" of the
> compiler?)
be aware that eclipse has a project specific jdk compliance setting
rightclick Project in Package Expl
Michael:
I imported my GPX Reader Plug-in Eclipse project to Netbeans and ran a
build. The resulting JAR works just fine in OpenJUMP.
Somehow Eclipse was still compiling for Java 1.7, despite all my
efforts. I'll see if I can't use Netbeans to put together a version of
the plug-in for 1.5 and 1.6
Thanks for the help Michael. If I don't talk to you, have a good weekend.
Landon
2012/2/24 Michaël Michaud :
> Hi
>> I tried uninstalling JDK 1.7. That made no difference.
>>
>> I set the "JDK Compliance" to 1.6 and 1.5, but that didn't make a
>> difference either. (Is that what you meant by "tar
Hi
> I tried uninstalling JDK 1.7. That made no difference.
>
> I set the "JDK Compliance" to 1.6 and 1.5, but that didn't make a
> difference either. (Is that what you meant by "target version" of the
> compiler?)
Yes, probably,
> I also removed all the plug-in dependencies. It didn't get past the
I tried uninstalling JDK 1.7. That made no difference.
I set the "JDK Compliance" to 1.6 and 1.5, but that didn't make a
difference either. (Is that what you meant by "target version" of the
compiler?)
I also removed all the plug-in dependencies. It didn't get past the
configure method of the plu
Hi
> I believe it depends on how the JAR file for the plug-in is produced.
> If you compile and build the Jar using Ant from inside Eclipse, then
> Ant controls. I checked my tools.jar in the Ant Runtime Configuration,
> at it is being pulled from a 1.6 JDK. This should be the same Eclipse
> is usi
Michael:
Thanks for the response.
You wrote: "Is your ant script or your Eclipse settings deciding which compiler
version you are using ?"
I believe it depends on how the JAR file for the plug-in is produced.
If you compile and build the Jar using Ant from inside Eclipse, then
Ant controls. I ch
Hi,
> I've set my compiler settings for the GPX project to Java 1.6 on both
> plug-in projects. I'm building both with Ant in Eclipse.
Is your ant script or your Eclipse settings deciding which compiler
version you are using ?
Does your GPX plugin have dependencies ?
Did you try to remove (or no r
I spent a few hours today trying to troubleshoot the problem with the
"missing menu" on my GPX reader plug-in. This involved, among other
things, copying an Eclipse project for a plug-in that would work
properly and moving my GPX source code into that project.
I've set my compiler settings for the
12 matches
Mail list logo
