Re: Can't create a project in Openstack Grizzly with Juju

2013-08-23 Thread James Page
t;., referer: http://172.16.118.21/horizon/admin/projects/ Not sure why you are seeing this - try turning on online compression and debug errors: juju set keystone offline-compression="no" debug="yes" That should at least give you a stack trace in the web browser with more in

Re: [ANN] juju-core 1.13.2 has been released

2013-08-26 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/08/13 13:17, David Cheney wrote: > Thanks John. James -- I have uploaded the release tarball now, > sorry about the delay, I was in an airplane. No problem; juju-core 1.13.2 also uploaded to Saucy. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubun

Re: Sharing a DB user password among units of the app

2013-10-30 Thread James Page
peered service units via a unpriviledged SSH account and unison. Unless, of course, Juju grows a feature to allow peers to share data in a way which is more consistent that trying todo it via the peer relation. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debia

Re: Use non-released images with the openstack provider

2013-12-09 Thread James Page
re already doing this) and switch the stream in via environment configuration rather than having to push images into specific environment for daily testing. I already raised a bug for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1217397 it would be great if it could get some attention for the

Re: JuJu, LXC, OpenStack charm problem w/Nova & Quantum

2014-03-17 Thread James Page
te that the OpenStack charms themselves do support using LXC as the virtualization choice instead of KVM - this is a configuration option in the nova-compute charm - but this is different to running OpenStack itself under LXC. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp.

Re: JuJu, LXC, OpenStack charm problem w/Nova & Quantum

2014-03-17 Thread James Page
his nested on a KVM based cloud or directly on hardware; however out-of-the box you can't run this LXC in LXC. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - ht

Re: JuJu, LXC, OpenStack charm problem w/Nova & Quantum

2014-03-19 Thread James Page
;charm" referred to > "quantum-gateway" instead of the newer "Neutron" terminology makes > me wonder whether this code has just not been updated lately? It has - we just lack a good way to rename a charm and facilitate a switch to the new charm name for existing d

Re: Openstack and Juju not working

2014-03-26 Thread James Page
icates that swift backend behind apache is not working correctly - could you confirm that swift is functional using the openstack-dashboard? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment:

Re: juju-core 1.17.7 is released

2014-03-28 Thread James Page
. One thing I did notice is that its not possible to bootstrap a 1.17.7 deployment with a 1.17.6 client - jujud fails to start as - --instance-id is not passed in the metadata. Upgrading to 1.17.7 client fixes this issue. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubunt

Re: nova-volume charm in Trusty

2014-04-24 Thread James Page
27;ve imported the Precise charm > into a local charm repo and run it, which predictably has failed. nova-volume was deprecated and removed during the folsom cycle so won't be found in trusty; use cinder instead. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@

Re: nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

2014-05-01 Thread James Page
ET_CIDR \ 1 256--bridge=br100 --bridge_interface=eth1 --multi_host=T This makes the compute nodes use eth1 for private networking in multihost mode. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Us

Re: nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

2014-05-01 Thread James Page
been working on a OpenStack + Juju + MAAS guide this cycle - its in final review and hopefully should be out in the next couple of weeks. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with

Re: nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

2014-05-01 Thread James Page
g on a OpenStack + Juju + MAAS guide this cycle - its in >> final review and hopefully should be out in the next couple of >> weeks. > > Is there a way I can help with and or review the wip? I'm hoping to > have this deployment in service in a couple weeks and I'm sure

Development Policy for OpenStack Charms

2014-06-02 Thread James Page
e are also working to include Amulet tests in all Charms so that we can start doing more automated gating of proposed changes. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG

Evolving charm names and configuration options

2014-06-11 Thread James Page
is challenge and if so how are people dealing with it? Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTmBbWAA

Re: ~charmers Application - David Britton

2014-08-11 Thread James Page
ecise/haproxy > https://jujucharms.com/precise/apache2 > > A couple larger MPs that I have authored: > > https://code.launchpad.net/~davidpbritton/charms/precise/haproxy/fix-service-entries/+merge/202387 > > https://code.launchpad.net/~davidpbritton/charms/precise/apache2/vhost-config-relat

Re: ~charmers Application - David Britton

2014-08-15 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Required +1 count met (and exceeded!). Welcome to the team! - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT7coaAAoJEL/srsug59jDpuYP/j

Re: Another ~charmers application! - Chris Glass

2014-09-25 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/09/14 06:51, Chris Glass wrote: > Hi all, > > It's my turn to apply for ~charmers membership. I stopped reading here: +1 Please keep making me write better python code. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p

Re: Swift middleware subordinate charms?

2014-09-25 Thread James Page
l > the middleware dependencies. I'll hack around for now, and maybe > I'll propose something later if anything becomes of my charm. That sounds like the best approach - we did something similar for cinder backends - see the cinder and cinder-ceph or cinder-vmware charms. - -

Re: Updated Openstack charms broke our HA

2014-11-12 Thread James Page
//bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/nova-cloud-controller/+bug/1391784 to track this - my team will work on landing fixes into /next branches with updates to the stable charms in the charm store this week. Apologies for the break... Regards James - -- - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Develop

Re: Updated Openstack charms broke our HA

2014-11-12 Thread James Page
split' feature of the charms in more detail; we also plan to overhaul the README's in all charms this cycle - they have been neglected. Regards James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Updated Openstack charms broke our HA

2014-11-12 Thread James Page
address consolidation and ingress management into your cloud from the Internet Any thoughts? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYzJUAAoJEL/srsu

MySQL Charm maintainership

2015-02-01 Thread James Page
harms [1] https://javacruft.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/openstack-charms-1501-release/ - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUzwz3AAoJEL/srsug59jDiaIQAJ8fapTO2

Renaming the quantum-gateway charm -> neutron-gateway

2015-06-26 Thread James Page
remain in the charm store but won't be receiving any fixes or updates from 15.04 onwards. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVjQIlAAoJEL/sr

Re: Using distributed router in neutron

2015-11-06 Thread James Page
Hi Pshem You need to make use of the neutron-openvswitch charm - this is a subordinate charm that's deployed with nova-compute, and manages the neutron configuration and agents on compute nodes. In the same way that you provide ext-port to neutron-gateway, you'll need todo the same with neutron-o

Re: Ceph deployment

2015-11-19 Thread James Page
Hi Pshem On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to deploy ceph and ceph-osd, however with this config: > > ceph: > source: cloud:trusty-liberty > fsid: 015cc90c-8f06-11e5-be28-0050569a > monitor-secret: AQB3QU5WiW3GEhAAVLK19SNzR46kXXX== > osd-de

Re: Ceph deployment

2015-11-20 Thread James Page
;> Hi, >> >> Please see the complete juju status for the whole setup. >> >> This is a test/POC setup. I'm building this on 3 machines - two compute >> nodes that also run the ceph-osd and once generic 'controller' node that >> carries all th

Re: [Ecosystem-engineering] The future of Charm Helpers

2015-11-23 Thread James Page
Hi Marco On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm rebooting this conversation because it never fully came to a > resolution and since this topic was discussed a lot has happened in the > Charm Ecosystem. I still hold firm, and a lot of charmers I've spoken wi

Re: The future of Charm Helpers

2015-11-23 Thread James Page
Hi Merlijn On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts < merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm all for requiring everything under the charms namespace to be reactive > aware. > > It is hard for people who are less involved to make sense of all the > different ways to Charm. It's even h

Re: The future of Charm Helpers

2015-11-23 Thread James Page
harms.hookenv for example - so charms.hookenv should be reactive aware, but should also be functional without the reactive framework - does that make things clearer? > > 2015-11-23 10:40 GMT+01:00 James Page : > >> Hi Merlijn >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:32 AM, M

Re: Tuning ceph

2015-11-30 Thread James Page
Hi Pshem On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > Hi, > > In this particular case I just want to make sure that my settings for > CRUSH are used for various pools and be able to define my own pools (see > below). > > I'm trying to create two different pools for both nova-comput

Review Queue - midonet-api

2015-12-17 Thread James Page
Hi Folks I spent my morning reviewing the Midonet charms proposed under: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1453678 I set myself a challenge of managing to run the amulet tests in our egress limited QA cloud; managed to get most of that working with local mirrors of datastax and midonet re

RE: Upgrading charms to 16.01

2016-01-28 Thread James Page
Hi Pshem On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 at 22:39 Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > I've tried to upgrade keystone to the new charm version (from liberty). > I've updated the source: > > juju set keystone openstack-origin=cloud:trusty-mitaka > > and scheduled an upgrade: > > juju upgrade charm keystone > > but the

Re: Upgrading charms to 16.01 - Ceph

2016-02-01 Thread James Page
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 at 15:04 Darryl Weaver wrote: > I've seen that bug too and just tested a kilo to liberty upgrade in my lab. > So, I've submitted a bug report here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/ceph/+bug/1540376 > Currently the behaviour of changing the source config option on t

Re: Upgrading charms to 16.01 - Ceph

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
Hi Darryl On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 00:39 Darryl Weaver wrote: > This would therefore have implications for co-locating nova-compute with > ceph charms on physical nodes. > Upgrading nova-compute would update the apt repository regardless of what > the ceph charm is doing. > Yes - this is one of th

Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
Hi All I've been using Juju 2.0 (built from source with an in-flight patch for LXD 2.0 right now - but that should be resolved soon) with the local LXD provider on Ubuntu Xenial development to test some work we've been doing to get OpenStack running on-top of LXD in a single machine. That's now w

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 13:23 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: > > juju create-model midonet-review > > juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > >

Review Queue: midonet-api, midonet-agent, neutron-agents-midonet

2016-02-04 Thread James Page
Hi All I've spent most of the last two days working with Toni from Midonet to review and test their proposed charms to support deployment of the Midonet SDN as part of the OpenStack charms. Alongside reviewing the actual charm code (they are all services framework integrated with puppet modules f

Migration of OpenStack Charm development to OpenStack git/gerrit

2016-02-19 Thread James Page
Hi All As you may or may not be aware, the OpenStack team have been working towards migration of the development process around the OpenStack charms to the OpenStack project. This means we will be moving away from current the bzr/launchpad workflow to a git/gerrit workflow inline with most other

Re: Migration of OpenStack Charm development to OpenStack git/gerrit

2016-03-02 Thread James Page
27;ll have something in place soon-ish to auto-comment on proposed merges redirecting people to use the new development workflow. Regards James On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 at 07:59 James Page wrote: > After some poking of the infratructure team this morning, migration is > currently underway; plea

Re: LXC/LXD profiles through Juju

2016-04-23 Thread James Page
Hi Tom On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 at 15:38 Tom Barber wrote: > Hello folks > > Working on my presentation for ApacheCon and trying to leverage some of > the great new stuff available. > > I've not tested it yet, so this is a slightly lazy question but as I'm a > way off of being at this stage I might a

Re: Neutron, openvswitch jumbo packets

2016-05-09 Thread James Page
Hi Ed On Sat, 7 May 2016 at 10:30 ed bond wrote: > Anyone have experience with the charms to be able to set the MTU to jumbo > packets? > > Right now in testing to see if it would work we had to do this: > > for i in `ip a | grep mtu| egrep -ve > "eth0|eth1|eth2|eth3|bond0|lo|juju-br0" | awk '{p

Re: rabbitmq-server hook "config-changed" failed (dns resolver)

2016-05-23 Thread James Page
Hi Khairul On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 21:00 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Hi Khairul > > Thanks for the mail, let's see if Adam cc'd has any insight to share with > the list. > > > Mark > > > On 23/05/16 22:38, Khairul Aizat Kamarudzzaman wrote: > > Hi all, > Im getting error while running conjure-up o

Increasing the size of VERSION in tabular status output

2016-09-19 Thread James Page
Hi All We've been experimenting with the new application-version-set feature in Juju 2.0 in the OpenStack charms team; it provides a much needed way for a charm to indicate which version of an OpenStack component is deployed at any given point in time. We've come up with an approach that either u

Re: updating ceph-osd config

2017-01-03 Thread James Page
Hi Daniel On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 at 03:58 Daniel Bidwell wrote: I started out installing openstack-base and then went back to add more disks to be used for block storage. The default was /dev/sdb. I added /dev/sda, /dev/sdc, and /dev/sdd via the juju gui, saved and deployed. Nothing happened. I

Bug tracking for the OpenStack Charms

2017-02-24 Thread James Page
Hi All As of yesterdays OpenStack charm release, we'll be tracking bugs for these charms under the OpenStack Charms project group: https://launchpad.net/openstack-charms rather than as part of the charms distro on Launchpad; each charm now has its own project, which is part of the group so we

Re: cinder and ceilometer metrics architecture question

2017-03-08 Thread James Page
Hi Drew On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 at 16:03 Drew Freiberger wrote: [...] > Unfortunately, nothing in ceilometer is picking up the > oslo_message_notifications on the unit where cinder is running. I went > to add the ceilometer-agent-charm to the unit, but found it's only > written to pick up OS and Com

Proposing Alex Kavanagh for ~charmers

2017-04-26 Thread James Page
Hi Charmers I'd like to propose Alex (tinwood) for membership of charmers; he's worked extensively across the OpenStack charms, providing valuable reviews to the rest of the team, has been reviewing charm-helpers updates and has been instrumental in the OpenStack charms use of reactive and layers

Re: openstack-telemetry blocked: memcached requires ipv6

2017-05-03 Thread James Page
Hi Patrizio and Mark On Wed, 3 May 2017 at 06:14 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/05/17 03:25, Patrizio Bassi wrote: > > in MAAS i added ipv6.disable = 1 to cmd line params for my machines > > and this makes all ceilometer-agent/XXX units to be stuck as blocked > > due to "Services not running t

Re: juju deployed openstack nova-lxd cannot start instances

2017-05-08 Thread James Page
Hi Patrizio On Mon, 8 May 2017 at 11:53 Patrizio Bassi wrote: [...] > 1) [minor] accessing horizon in the hypervisor list it is seen as hostname > without fqdn while other 4 hosts has fqdn. > Yes there is a minor diff between LXD and KVM hypervisors: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova-lxd/+bug/

Re: juju deployed openstack nova-lxd cannot start instances

2017-05-17 Thread James Page
HI Patrizio On Fri, 12 May 2017 at 10:52 Patrizio Bassi wrote: > Dear James, All > > i opened a bug, hope you can give it some love. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1690345 > Apologies for response lag - last week was busy due to the OpenStack summit! Looking into this again now. Cheer

Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread James Page
Hi Charmers There has been a bubbling undercurrent of desire to move charmhelpers code hosting out of bazaar on Launchpad to git on github,com alongside other charm ecosystem development tooling. I'd like to get the code migrated over ASAP and then we can start enabling automatic PR testing and s

Re: database-relation-join not invoked

2017-05-26 Thread James Page
Hi Giuseppe On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 18:00 Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > I have written a charm for OpenStack Gnocchi. > Firstly its great that you've started work on a Gnocchi charm; this is on the TODO list for the OpenStack Charms project for the current development cycle and it would be great if

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-06-05 Thread James Page
On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 14:17 Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 14:14 Alex Kavanagh > wrote: > >> Hi James >> >> I'm a big +1 to this idea, but with one tiny reservation: I have a >> rather large merge-proposal regarding a refactor of the hosts + ports fetch >> bug + refactor of the f

OpenStack Telemetry Refresh (was Re: new ceilometer)

2017-07-12 Thread James Page
Hi Dmitrii On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 at 12:10 Dmitrii Shcherbakov < dmitrii.shcherba...@canonical.com> wrote: Hi Giuseppe, > > First of all, thank you for looking into writing a gnocchi charm! > > There is already an ongoing effort from James Page on charming gnocchi: > https:/

charmhelpers migration to github

2017-07-21 Thread James Page
Hi All Managed to find some time to test the bzr->git migration more, including some tidy of committers and other general hygiene. https://github.com/juju/charm-helpers I think we're in a good position to plan for a switch - I appreciate there are a number of open reviews against the bzr bran

Re: Juju Charmer application

2017-08-30 Thread James Page
+1 On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 11:15 Frode Nordahl wrote: > Dear Juju community, > > I would like to officially apply for membership of the Juju ~charmers team. > > Through the course of the past year I have made contributions to the > OpenStack Charms and other Charm projects. I have also had the pr

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

2017-09-18 Thread James Page
Resurrecting this thread; I think its a good time to push on with this work - anyone have any objections to targeting this week to complete the migration? On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 at 19:55 David Ames wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:46 AM, James Page wrote: > > Hi All > > > >

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

2017-09-19 Thread James Page
t souls to the new github.com location as part of the migration. On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 at 14:15 Alex Kavanagh wrote: > I'm a +1 on this too. Let the good times roll. > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:22 AM, James Page > wrote: > >> Resurrecting this thread; I think its a good tim

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

2017-09-20 Thread James Page
t; > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Marco Ceppi > wrote: > >> I've updated the launchpad description to highlight the change. Since >> there's bound to be processes still pointing at the lp branch, should we >> set it up as a mirror from git? >> >>

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

2017-09-20 Thread James Page
If you're a part of the charmers team on Launchpad you should now either have access to approve pull requests + merge or you should have an invite to join the team that can do this :-) If you don't have one PM me on freenode IRC with your github username. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 11:57

Re: FW: [PIKE] juju based OpenStack --Query

2017-10-12 Thread James Page
Hi Akshay I think you've tripped over: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-keystone/+bug/1722909 which I did as well last night - this only impacts the development version of the charm which you are using with the bundle. I have a fix up for this, should land in the next couple of hours (we've b

Re: Juju Openstack - Blocked

2018-02-15 Thread James Page
Hi James On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 20:22 James Beedy wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing some issues with a base-openstack deploy. > > I can get a base-openstack to deploy legitimately using MAAS with no > apparent errors from Juju's perspective. Following some init ops and the > launching of an

Re: ceilometer

2018-02-21 Thread James Page
Hi Giuseppe On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 at 11:15 Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > The latest Ceilometer non longer uses a DB to store its data, but rather > it sends it in a pipeline to Gnocchi. > In order to use Ceilometer with Gnocchi, I had to patch the ceilometer > bundle not to wait for a shared-db relati