On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 14:17 Adam Collard <adam.coll...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 14:14 Alex Kavanagh <alex.kavan...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Hi James >> >> I'm a big +1 to this idea, but with one tiny reservation: I have a >> rather large merge-proposal regarding a refactor of the hosts + ports fetch >> bug + refactor of the fetch code. It would be nice to get that in first >> (but that's purely personal!) >> >> However, we'll lose the history of the project if/when it is moved; can >> the existing project be 'closed' to new commits, but kept available for >> history? >> > > Hmm, why will we lose this history? > > I assume the plan is to convert history a la > https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git#Converting_from_Bazaar_to_Git > Yes that is the plan - testing migrations today (needs some rewrites for commit authors to be nice and clean).
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
