[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17925343#comment-17925343
]
Nil Madhab commented on KAFKA-18713:
[https://github.com/nilmadhab/kafka-examples/bl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nil Madhab reassigned KAFKA-18713:
--
Assignee: Nil Madhab
> Kafka Streams Left-Join not always emitting the last value
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17925342#comment-17925342
]
Nil Madhab commented on KAFKA-18713:
If I don't create 10 partition, will the issue
sgn2607 commented on PR #17593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17593#issuecomment-2646085988
@urbandan I see the PR is marked stale, but the KIP is still in progress. Is
it still active?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
ijuma commented on PR #18783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18783#issuecomment-2646059254
Yes, I think a benchmark for `TopicIdPartition` would be a good one since
the original implementation is pretty simple and if the generated
implementation has additional fixed overhead, tha
frankvicky commented on PR #18783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18783#issuecomment-2646051954
I see.
I will prepare one 🙇🏼
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #17732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/17732#issuecomment-2646050655
This PR is being marked as stale since it has not had any activity in 90
days. If you
would like to keep this PR alive, please leave a comment asking for a
review. If the P
chia7712 commented on PR #18783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18783#issuecomment-2646048265
> you would want to write a benchmark and confirm
@frankvicky Since we have many JIRA tickets related to rewriting code with
record classes, it would be great to have a JMH benchma
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #18489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18489#issuecomment-2646045155
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to
raise the
attention of the committers. Once this issue has been triaged, the `triage`
label
s
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #18752:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18752#issuecomment-2646045130
A label of 'needs-attention' was automatically added to this PR in order to
raise the
attention of the committers. Once this issue has been triaged, the `triage`
label
s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17925333#comment-17925333
]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-18697:
-
{quote}[~ijuma]Â Would you recommend applying
ijuma commented on PR #18783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18783#issuecomment-2646033413
@TaiJuWu I know about the spec, but the actual implementation details
matter. So, you would want to write a benchmark and confirm - not simply rely
on reading the specification.
--
This
divijvaidya commented on PR #18106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18106#issuecomment-2645938748
@mjsax I am sorry to hear that people had to spend multiple hours trying to
fix this. I considered this change safe for KS without an expert review because:
1. the change maintained
Andrew Schofield created KAFKA-18761:
Summary: kafka-share-groups.sh --describe only shows offset
information when members exist
Key: KAFKA-18761
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18761
m1a2st commented on code in PR #18807:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18807#discussion_r1947929551
##
server/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/server/ListOffsetsPartitionStatus.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one o
dejan2609 commented on PR #18018:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18018#issuecomment-2645884106
@apoorvmittal10, @Goooler and @poom-kitti: feel free to review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
dejan2609 commented on PR #18018:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18018#issuecomment-2645879873
I just pushed another commit that solves issues described by @poom-kitti
above.
Herewith my environment and some test I performed :arrow_down:
## Environment:
Java
kamalcph commented on code in PR #18807:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18807#discussion_r1947891621
##
server/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/server/ListOffsetsPartitionStatus.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
kamalcph commented on code in PR #18807:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18807#discussion_r1947868160
##
server/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/server/ListOffsetsPartitionStatus.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17924908#comment-17924908
]
TengYao Chi edited comment on KAFKA-18737 at 2/8/25 3:26 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nil Madhab updated KAFKA-18713:
---
Description:
There seems to be an issue when performing a left-join, the latest value with
of the j
FrankYang0529 commented on code in PR #18012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18012#discussion_r1947824039
##
storage/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/storage/internals/log/LogSegment.java:
##
@@ -232,38 +232,38 @@ private boolean canConvertToRelativeOffset(long offset)
frankvicky commented on PR #18844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18844#issuecomment-2645600078
The main issue is deciding which flag(--standalone, --initial-controllers,
or --no-initial-controllers) should be used in run time.
`--initial-controllers` is the easiest one; we
frankvicky opened a new pull request, #18844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18844
JIRA: KAFKA-18737
KafkaDockerWrapper is unable to execute the setup command properly since
Apache Kafka 4.0 sets dynamic quorum as the default setting. When executing
StorageTool, KafkaDockerWra
ukpagrace commented on PR #18673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18673#issuecomment-2645509003
> Did not forget about it. Just no time yet.
Thanks for the update, Matthias. If someone else can review it, let me know
who to reach out to.
--
This is an automated message fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17925187#comment-17925187
]
Jimmy Wang commented on KAFKA-18755:
Hi [~schofielaj] , I could help to handle this
JimmyWang6 commented on PR #18819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18819#issuecomment-2644750671
FLAKY ⚠️ EagerConsumerCoordinatorTest > testOutdatedCoordinatorAssignment()
FLAKY ⚠️ AbstractCoordinatorTest >
testWakeupAfterSyncGroupReceivedExternalCompletion()
FLAKY ⚠️ Coo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-18713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17925180#comment-17925180
]
Nil Madhab commented on KAFKA-18713:
Can I pick this up or is it bit too challenging
frankvicky commented on code in PR #18394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18394#discussion_r1947539654
##
core/src/main/java/kafka/docker/Log4jConfiguration.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contr
29 matches
Mail list logo
