mark harwood wrote:
Regretfully, I'm a terrible Swing programmer
I know you've raised this before, - I wasn't prompting you to do the work :)
I did make some promising in-roads into a GWT web-based version which was Apache-license friendly but ultimately I didn't want to bring in a build-time
whichever is chosen.
Just a huge thank you for making this tool available!
Great tool!
//andy
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's
> almost ready, and the release shoul
Message
From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2008 11:32:37
Subject: Re: Luke is coming .. not there yet.
mark harwood wrote:
>>> I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be
>
mark harwood wrote:
I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be
preferable
A Swing-based one, managed in Lucene/contrib and released with every Lucene
build .
;)
I agree, this would be ideal. Regretfully, I'm a terrible Swing
programmer, so unless someone el
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
1) Luke 2.4 release. This has the advantage of being an official stable
[...]
2) Luke 2.9-dev snapshot. This has the advantage that you get the
[...]
Of course I meant Lucene 2.4 and Lucene 2.9-dev ... sorry for the confusion.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki
>>I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be
>>preferable
A Swing-based one, managed in Lucene/contrib and released with every Lucene
build .
;)
- Original Message
From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thur
