>>I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be 
>>preferable

A Swing-based one, managed in Lucene/contrib and released with every Lucene 
build .

;)






----- Original Message ----
From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2008 11:06:02
Subject: Luke is coming .. not there yet.

Hi all,

Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's almost 
ready, and the release should happen in about a week, depending on the 
situation in my daily job.

I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be 
preferable to include in this Luke release:

1) Luke 2.4 release. This has the advantage of being an official stable 
release, with a well-defined functionality. The disadvantage is that you will 
miss some new features available in 2.9 (current trunk) for a long time to 
come, at least until the next Lucene release.

2) Luke 2.9-dev snapshot. This has the advantage that you get the cutting-edge 
features, and it's easier to update Luke to the most recent version of Lucene. 
However, it means that any modifications to existing indexes (such as e.g. 
deleting a doc, or optimizing an index) will promote the index to a new format, 
incompatible with earlier versions of Lucene (including 2.4 release).

-- Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to