>>I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be >>preferable
A Swing-based one, managed in Lucene/contrib and released with every Lucene build . ;) ----- Original Message ---- From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2008 11:06:02 Subject: Luke is coming .. not there yet. Hi all, Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's almost ready, and the release should happen in about a week, depending on the situation in my daily job. I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be preferable to include in this Luke release: 1) Luke 2.4 release. This has the advantage of being an official stable release, with a well-defined functionality. The disadvantage is that you will miss some new features available in 2.9 (current trunk) for a long time to come, at least until the next Lucene release. 2) Luke 2.9-dev snapshot. This has the advantage that you get the cutting-edge features, and it's easier to update Luke to the most recent version of Lucene. However, it means that any modifications to existing indexes (such as e.g. deleting a doc, or optimizing an index) will promote the index to a new format, incompatible with earlier versions of Lucene (including 2.4 release). -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
