whichever is chosen. Just a huge thank you for making this tool available!
Great tool! //andy On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's > almost ready, and the release should happen in about a week, depending on > the situation in my daily job. > > I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be > preferable to include in this Luke release: > > 1) Luke 2.4 release. This has the advantage of being an official stable > release, with a well-defined functionality. The disadvantage is that you > will miss some new features available in 2.9 (current trunk) for a long time > to come, at least until the next Lucene release. > > 2) Luke 2.9-dev snapshot. This has the advantage that you get the > cutting-edge features, and it's easier to update Luke to the most recent > version of Lucene. However, it means that any modifications to existing > indexes (such as e.g. deleting a doc, or optimizing an index) will promote > the index to a new format, incompatible with earlier versions of Lucene > (including 2.4 release). > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej Bialecki <>< > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
