sense.
--Regards,
Rakesh S
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers
Lutan,
Yes, no problem. I am away at a conference next week but plan to
release the code the following week
Hi Glen,
Is your source code available? I would like to have a look at it and check if
whatever I have tried makes sense.
--Regards,
Rakesh S
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Concurrent query benc
Also note, there is the contrib/benchmark source in Lucene that allows
one to do many of these tests in a "standard" way, such that the
results are easily reproducible.
Do you actually have a situation where you would ever see 8K threads?
Or even 4k? Or was this just for the purposes of t
TO : Glen Newton
Thank you very much!
I am so glad to learn it.
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> java-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with
> 1,2,4,8 readers> > Lutan,> > Yes, no problem.
Lutan,
Yes, no problem. I am away at a conference next week but plan to
release the code the following week. Is this OK for you?
thanks,
Glen
2008/6/13 lutan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> TO: Glen Newton Could I get your test code or code architecture for study.
> I have try to using java.util.concu
TO: Glen Newton Could I get your test code or code architecture for study.
I have try to using java.util.concurrent package(
like ArrayBlockingQueue ThreadPoolExecutor;)
with lucene,but it is no successful.I don't
know how to design.
Thanks ! my emial: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Otis,
Thanks for the feedback.
2008/6/11 Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Glen,
>
> Aha, good to see the benefit of multiple IndexReaders/Searchers so clearly.
> Makes me think we'll want to add a config setting for this in Solr... :)
Until then, you might want to use: Runtime.ava
Hi Glen,
Aha, good to see the benefit of multiple IndexReaders/Searchers so clearly.
Makes me think we'll want to add a config setting for this in Solr... :)
As for why 4 is the best choice, I think it's because of those 4 cores that
you've got. My guess is that you'll see slightly better per
Thanks for the positive feedback. :-)
Yes, right now the benchmark only uses one IndexSearcher for all
threads, but I have completed an extension that allows you to either
1) have multiple searchers for the same index; or 2) have multiple
indexes (copies of one another) with a single searcher per
Good work!
I would like to see how it performs with several index reader instances,
which is said to increase concurrency.
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application
site: http://www.dbsight.net
demo: http://search.dbsight.com
Lucene Datab
2008/6/9 Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Glen,
>
> Thanks for sharing. Does your benchmarking tool build on top of
> contrib/benchmark? (not sure if that one lets you specify the number of
> concurrent threads -- if it does not, perhaps this is an opportunity to add
> this functional
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
> Thanks for sharing. Does your benchmarking tool build on top of
> contrib/benchmark? (not sure if that one lets you specify the number of
> concurrent threads -- if it does not, perhaps this is an opportu
Hi Glen,
Thanks for sharing. Does your benchmarking tool build on top of
contrib/benchmark? (not sure if that one lets you specify the number of
concurrent threads -- if it does not, perhaps this is an opportunity to add
this functionality).
I couldn't find info about the index format (compou
13 matches
Mail list logo
