Hi Glen, Thanks for sharing. Does your benchmarking tool build on top of contrib/benchmark? (not sure if that one lets you specify the number of concurrent threads -- if it does not, perhaps this is an opportunity to add this functionality).
I couldn't find info about the index format (compound or not) you used. It would be good to see the comparison with high number of threads for the 2 index formats. It would also be good to see the numbers when the index has no deletion and when it has some percentage of docs deleted. Finally, if you end up extending contrib/benchmark, I think just having the ability to pump the results of that into a gnuplot script would be nice to have. I've written a standalone benchmarking tool that did pretty much what yours seems to do, but I wrote it for Technorati, so I can't release it. :( Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Glen Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51:41 AM > Subject: Concurrent query benchmarks > > A number of people have asked about query benchmarks. > > I have posted benchmarks for concurrent query requests for Lucene > 2.3.1 on my blog, where I look at 1 - 4096 concurrent requests: > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/06/simultaneous-threaded-query-lucene.html > > I hope you find this useful. > > thanks, > > Glen > > -- > > - > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
