Hi Glen, Aha, good to see the benefit of multiple IndexReaders/Searchers so clearly. Makes me think we'll want to add a config setting for this in Solr... :)
As for why 4 is the best choice, I think it's because of those 4 cores that you've got. My guess is that you'll see slightly better performance with 5 threads and then the performance will slowly deteriorate with more readers/searchers.... let's see it! Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Glen Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:07:45 PM > Subject: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers > > I have extended my evaluation (previous evaluation: > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/06/simultaneous-threaded-query-lucene.html) > to include as well as an increasing # of threads performing concurrent > queries, 1,2,4 and 8 IndexReaders. > > The results can be found here: > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/06/lucene-concurrent-search-performance.html > > thanks, > > Glen > > -- > > - > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
