mark harwood wrote:
Regretfully, I'm a terrible Swing programmer
I know you've raised this before, - I wasn't prompting you to do the work :)
I did make some promising in-roads into a GWT web-based version which was Apache-license friendly but ultimately I didn't want to bring in a build-time
whichever is chosen.
Just a huge thank you for making this tool available!
Great tool!
//andy
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's
> almost ready, and the release shoul
Message
From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2008 11:32:37
Subject: Re: Luke is coming .. not there yet.
mark harwood wrote:
>>> I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be
>
mark harwood wrote:
I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would be
preferable
A Swing-based one, managed in Lucene/contrib and released with every Lucene
build .
;)
I agree, this would be ideal. Regretfully, I'm a terrible Swing
programmer, so unless someone el
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
1) Luke 2.4 release. This has the advantage of being an official stable
[...]
2) Luke 2.9-dev snapshot. This has the advantage that you get the
[...]
Of course I meant Lucene 2.4 and Lucene 2.9-dev ... sorry for the confusion.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2008 11:06:02
Subject: Luke is coming .. not there yet.
Hi all,
Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's almost
ready, and the release should happen in about a week, depending on the
situation in my daily job.
I&#
Hi all,
Many people ask me when the next version of Luke becomes available. It's
almost ready, and the release should happen in about a week, depending
on the situation in my daily job.
I'd like to ask the Lucene user community what version of Lucene would
be preferable to include in this Lu
