Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-25 Thread Grant Ingersoll
sense. --Regards, Rakesh S Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers Lutan, Yes, no problem. I am away at a conference next week but plan to release the code the following week

RE: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-24 Thread Rakesh Shete
Hi Glen, Is your source code available? I would like to have a look at it and check if whatever I have tried makes sense. --Regards, Rakesh S > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Concurrent query benc

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-16 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Also note, there is the contrib/benchmark source in Lucene that allows one to do many of these tests in a "standard" way, such that the results are easily reproducible. Do you actually have a situation where you would ever see 8K threads? Or even 4k? Or was this just for the purposes of t

RE: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-13 Thread lutan
TO : Glen Newton Thank you very much! I am so glad to learn it. > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > java-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with > 1,2,4,8 readers> > Lutan,> > Yes, no problem.

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-13 Thread Glen Newton
Lutan, Yes, no problem. I am away at a conference next week but plan to release the code the following week. Is this OK for you? thanks, Glen 2008/6/13 lutan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > TO: Glen Newton Could I get your test code or code architecture for study. > I have try to using java.util.concu

RE: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-13 Thread lutan
TO: Glen Newton Could I get your test code or code architecture for study. I have try to using java.util.concurrent package( like ArrayBlockingQueue ThreadPoolExecutor;) with lucene,but it is no successful.I don't know how to design. Thanks ! my emial: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-11 Thread Glen Newton
e >> From: Glen Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:07:45 PM >> Subject: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers >> >> I have extended my evaluation (previous evaluation: >> http://zzzo

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-11 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
o: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:07:45 PM > Subject: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers > > I have extended my evaluation (previous evaluation: > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/06/simultaneous-threaded-query-lucene.html) > to i

Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

2008-06-11 Thread Glen Newton
I have extended my evaluation (previous evaluation: http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/06/simultaneous-threaded-query-lucene.html) to include as well as an increasing # of threads performing concurrent queries, 1,2,4 and 8 IndexReaders. The results can be found here: http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/0

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks

2008-06-10 Thread Glen Newton
Thanks for the positive feedback. :-) Yes, right now the benchmark only uses one IndexSearcher for all threads, but I have completed an extension that allows you to either 1) have multiple searchers for the same index; or 2) have multiple indexes (copies of one another) with a single searcher per

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks

2008-06-10 Thread Chris Lu
Good work! I would like to see how it performs with several index reader instances, which is said to increase concurrency. -- Chris Lu - Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application site: http://www.dbsight.net demo: http://search.dbsight.com Lucene Datab

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks

2008-06-10 Thread Glen Newton
t; From: Glen Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51:41 AM >> Subject: Concurrent query benchmarks >> >> A number of people have asked about query benchmarks. >> >> I have posted benchmarks f

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks

2008-06-09 Thread Doron Cohen
ms to do, but I wrote it for Technorati, so I can't release it. :( > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > - Original Message > > From: Glen Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.or

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks

2008-06-09 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Glen Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:51:41 AM > Subject: Concurrent query benchmarks > > A number of people have asked about query benchm

Concurrent query benchmarks

2008-06-09 Thread Glen Newton
A number of people have asked about query benchmarks. I have posted benchmarks for concurrent query requests for Lucene 2.3.1 on my blog, where I look at 1 - 4096 concurrent requests: http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/06/simultaneous-threaded-query-lucene.html I hope you find this useful. thanks