smoldenhauer-ish commented on issue #537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/537#issuecomment-1515829269
I saw that
[fsGroupChangePolicy](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/#configure-volume-permission-and-ownership-change-policy-for-po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714464#comment-17714464
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-16741:
-
+1 to include in 9.2.1, if @ju
risdenk commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1172585833
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -204,6 +206,8 @@ static class AffinityPlacementPlugin implements
Plac
sonatype-lift[bot] commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1172586018
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -204,6 +206,8 @@ static class AffinityPlacementPlugin imple
Leonardo Potenza created SOLR-16756:
---
Summary: SchemaCodecFactory: add test coverage for
getKnnVectorsFormatForField
Key: SOLR-16756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16756
Project: So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714464#comment-17714464
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-16741 at 4/20/23 2:17 PM:
-
potenzal opened a new pull request, #1578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1578
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16756
# Description
The getKnnVectorsFormatForField() override in SchemaCodecFactory doesn't
seem to be covered by any of the existing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714633#comment-17714633
]
Bence Szabó commented on SOLR-16505:
I was looking at this issue and I think I could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714642#comment-17714642
]
Justin Sweeney commented on SOLR-16741:
---
Feel free to backport this to 9.2 for the
HoustonPutman commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1172807490
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -503,15 +534,199 @@ private String getNodeAZ(Node n, final Attri
bqcuong commented on code in PR #1575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1575#discussion_r1171494844
##
solr/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ Improvements
/api/collections/collName/snapshots/snapshotName`, listed at `GET
/api/collections/collName/snapshots`, and dele
epugh merged PR #1568:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1568
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714696#comment-17714696
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16711:
Commit 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714698#comment-17714698
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16711:
Commit f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Pugh resolved SOLR-16711.
--
Fix Version/s: main (10.0)
9.3
Resolution: Fixed
> Seperate tools out of Solr
Eric Pugh created SOLR-16757:
Summary: Clean up Solr CLI's for the Future
Key: SOLR-16757
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16757
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Security Level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Pugh updated SOLR-16757:
-
Summary: Umbrella Ticket for Reading Solr CLI's for the Future (was: Clean
up Solr CLI's for the Future)
magibney commented on PR #1440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1440#issuecomment-1516725785
@noblepaul take a look at https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/513 -- in
particular, the RawShimTextResponseWriter which together with
TextResponseWriter (from which it is invoked) actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714700#comment-17714700
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-16757:
--
I've cast a wide net on the list of tickets to inclu
HoustonPutman commented on issue #537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/537#issuecomment-1516758452
Yeah reading more through it, it seems like the default functionality is
"Always", so its weird that it wouldn't be working in the first place. I guess
we need to keep the
patsonluk commented on PR #1477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1477#issuecomment-1516770497
> @patsonluk as it is mutating an existing Object, there is a small period
during which the state of a given replica is unpredictable . some replicas of
the collection would fetch state fr
tflobbe commented on PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#issuecomment-1516808584
> I do think a different name would be more appropriate though.
I see. I wasn't aware of the "spread" feature in Kubernetes, but yes, it
does look closer to what I have here. I was act
tflobbe commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1172983143
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -503,15 +534,199 @@ private String getNodeAZ(Node n, final AttributeVa
tflobbe commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1172987083
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -503,15 +534,199 @@ private String getNodeAZ(Node n, final AttributeVa
tflobbe commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1172989171
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -503,15 +534,199 @@ private String getNodeAZ(Node n, final AttributeVa
HoustonPutman commented on code in PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#discussion_r1173011527
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/plugins/AffinityPlacementFactory.java:
##
@@ -503,15 +534,199 @@ private String getNodeAZ(Node n, final Attri
Kira Traynor created SOLR-16758:
---
Summary: GraphQuery Performing Slower in Solr 9
Key: SOLR-16758
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16758
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Secur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kira Traynor updated SOLR-16758:
Description:
We found that the changes made in SOLR-14185 with the GraphQuery slowed down
the perf
HoustonPutman commented on PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#issuecomment-1516879031
> Let users configure the "spread", which is exactly what the PR is doing
for now (new features such as the maxSkew could be added in the future)
Yep 👍
> Make anti-affini
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17714749#comment-17714749
]
Michael Gibney commented on SOLR-16758:
---
Thanks for reporting! Can you share some s
tflobbe commented on PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#issuecomment-1516943262
I see. Do keep in mind that "availabilityZone" is already doing the first
level of spreading, and this configuration is only within one AZ (for racks, in
your example). I guess someone may w
HoustonPutman commented on PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#issuecomment-1516993264
> Do keep in mind that "availabilityZone" is already doing the first level
of spreading, and this configuration is only within one AZ (for racks, in your
example).
I did not rea
patsonluk commented on PR #1477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1477#issuecomment-1517068641
@noblepaul I have pushed the updates, it's using
`AtomicReference` very similar to the `PrsSupplier`, but it
does not fetch. The fetching is still done by the `PrsSupplier` but is only
ca
tflobbe commented on PR #1577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1577#issuecomment-1517074309
I've updated the code with a possible rename. the new validation of
"maxReplicasPerShardInDomain" is not being used yet.
Still, there is a need to improve javadocs and add something to th
dsmiley commented on PR #1504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1504#issuecomment-1517240922
I appreciate the bulleted summary of your last comment very much. It will
make a good commit message. I think this PR is in good shape.
Proposed CHANGES.txt _(less sure on this)_:
35 matches
Mail list logo
