On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:57:08PM -0700 or thereabouts, Justine Cubbage tenZeldam
wrote:
> Who, if any woman, has inspired you to be a Linux Chik? I'm trying
> to develop a mentoring program for young women to meet & be inspired
> by female high tech "success stories". Know any?
> Thanks!
I
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:55:33AM +1100 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jenny Brown (was Gable) wrote:
>
> > To that extent, it's been somewhat helpful, but not as much as
> > I expected. Mainly, I think, it's because I see women asking
> > questions and guys answering... and they'r
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:40:54PM +1100 or thereabouts, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:48:46AM +0100, Gina Lanik wrote:
> > um, excuse me, maybe I didn't get your point but what is wrong about
> > RTFM? I keep telling ppl on irc to do man this, man that, since the
> > manuals
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 03:07:01PM -0600 or thereabouts, Vinnie wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Simon Britnell wrote:
>
> > I don't recall seeing anything I thought was a troll, which makes me think
> > that some of my posts may be considered trolls.
>
> That may predate you, too. I remember one
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:38:01PM -0500 or thereabouts, Rick Scott wrote:
> (psyche:)
> > My general message to newbies (or semi-newbies, or even experienced
> > folks who are not used to working at the command line much) is--don't
> > be afraid to type in new commands just to try---just don't do
Warning: -horribly- long post though I've tried to snip sections.
I've been reading the entire thread but have been too busy to get
involved, much as I would have liked to, until now. For the record,
I am in agreement with those who see this as more an issue of context
than content. I have no
Naomi wrote:
> > This month's issue of Linux Magazine http://www.linux-mag.com has an
> > article entitled The Linux Magazine50: 50 Linux People to Watch. They
> > are ALL men, so I started thinking, well, if I write a letter about
Robert Kiesling wrote:
>
> Andrea Archangeli is listed there
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 09:27:32AM +0100 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Laurel Fan wrote:
>
> > > Ok, but why are all the women not contributing?
> >
> > Many are. It's just that like thousands of men and women, they aren't
> > high profile, so you don't know of
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 03:29:31AM + or thereabouts, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
[Caitlyn wondered if we were as many as 10% of the total Linux users]
> Um, I was counting the people who, while not having Linux as their
> primary OS, may use a Linux-based system for web serving, samba, etc
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 12:22:46PM - or thereabouts, Ian Phillips wrote:
(with no linebreaks, Ian, what happened? :))
> > LUGs to larger events with several thousand. And I would have put
> > the proportion of women who have attended those as much nearer 1-2%,
>
> That would be about right
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 01:14:02PM - or thereabouts, Ian Phillips wrote:
I know many people who would agree :)
> > judging by what I have seen and heard (and this isn't just the Slashdot
> > comments, this is at the shows), some people do indeed swap notes about
>
> I don't bother with sla
> or should be sufficiently well known that having their name one more
> place on the web would be no big deal. Not to take our glorious
> leader's name in vain, but I think Deb falls clearly into the latter
> category, for instance. Two other examples I can think of are Eliz
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 10:47:18PM +1100 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> leader's name in vain, but I think Deb falls clearly into the latter
> category, for instance. Two other examples I can think of are Elizabeth
> wossname who is an editor of LWN, and Telsa Gwynne,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 09:47:49AM -0500 or thereabouts, Deb Richardson wrote:
> This might sound odd, but I find that the fastest way to learn new Linux
> stuff is to try documenting it. Start by using available docs, but then
> branch out a bit -- explore areas that aren't covered by the availa
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 03:23:22PM +1300 or thereabouts, Simon Britnell wrote:
> I wasn't originally stating that women in general or women at linuxchix
> specifically are pushing quotas ( and you're right, quotas are what's worrying
> me ). What I was trying to express is that I think complainin
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 03:12:33PM -0500 or thereabouts, Cat wrote:
I think you're quoting me, there, actually :)
> > If at least some of the women in IT were able to report that they
> > had received none of the shit that most people here are all too well
> > aware of, that would be -really- c
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 01:52:03PM +1100 or thereabouts, Claudine Chionh wrote:
> Current Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility newsletter
> (http://www.cpsr.org/) focuses on gender issues in computing -- I
> found this link from Slashdot, which is a nice change from their usual
> ta
On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 06:52:39PM +1100 or thereabouts, Jenn V. wrote:
> Kirrily 'Skud' Robert wrote:
> >
> > I'm with you on that one. It's not just dresses either... womens
> > jackets and trousers often don't have pockets in them at all, let alone
> > numerous or capacious ones.
>
> WHY are
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 07:46:43AM -0500 or thereabouts, Bad Mojo wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, curious wrote:
> > http://freshmeat.net/news/2000/02/05/949813140.html
>
> Wow, I couldn't seem to get away from this article all weekend. Every
> place I went had a link to it. Not that I was avoiding
19 matches
Mail list logo
