Re: [issues] Re: Outcome

2000-08-10 Thread Caitlyn Maire Martin
Look, nobody should have aired private, personal dirty laundry on list. There is no acceptable justification for it. > " So, Deb banned a long-time list > member and local-chapter founder on the basis of private, non-list e-mail. " Fine with me, if it keeps the dispute off list. I manage four

RE: [issues] copyright assignment

2000-08-10 Thread Kelda-Anne Sholdice
Hi again, I've found what I need for the moment. If I manage to get together anything resembling a useful body of information, I'll post it in case anyone else has similar q's at some point. l8r Kelda >Hi all, I've poked around the web a bit, but ... >I want to prepare a copyright assignment

Re: [issues] names [was: Anyone know any more about this study?]

2000-08-10 Thread srl
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nicole Zimmerman wrote: > Vinnie wrote: > > > You'd think having a (female) friend named vinnie would cure you of > > this automatic gender assignation > > It drives me nuts to have my name spelled wrong, let alone have someone > assume it's of a different gender... I can't

[issues] admin note, again

2000-08-10 Thread deb
Okay, here's what happened. Yesterday I unsubbed and banned the two parties involved simply because I got incredibly tired of having to deal with this stuff when I am already busier than any normal human should be. Last night, however, after finally getting my net access at home back (which requ