Chengxiang Li created FLINK-2848:
Summary: Refactor Flink benchmarks with JMH and move to
flink-benchmark module
Key: FLINK-2848
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2848
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951400#comment-14951400
]
Henry Saputra commented on FLINK-2847:
--
The PR that trigger the test fail just updati
Henry Saputra created FLINK-2847:
Summary: Fix flaky test in StormTestBase.testJob
Key: FLINK-2847
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2847
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951386#comment-14951386
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2842:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1245#issuecomment-147009826
Great that we finally get rid of this AWS dependency.
It seems that the dependency actually influenced somehow other dependencies
from Hadoop.
I have a test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951383#comment-14951383
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2591:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1121#issuecomment-147009266
That's indeed a good question. I don't have much time currently, but I'm
trying to answer you within the next few days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951247#comment-14951247
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2793:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the p
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1202#issuecomment-146991947
Oh I forgot. I still want to test it on Yarn.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951242#comment-14951242
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2793:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1202#issuecomment-146991673
Great ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1202#issuecomment-146991497
Have fixed a possible race condition in `JobManagerRetriever` and rebased
on the latest master. If Travis gives green light, I'll merge it.
---
If your project is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951240#comment-14951240
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2793:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951216#comment-14951216
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2844:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1246#issuecomment-146988445
`YarnSessionFIFOITCase` checks the old job manager web interface. We should
change that too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146980054
@mxm @StephanEwen I have an implementation ready. I have also added unit
tests to verify the behavior. Let me know if this is an acceptable way. All the
relevant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951151#comment-14951151
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951126#comment-14951126
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2804:
---
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull requ
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1249
[FLINK-2804] [runtime] Add blocking job submission support for HA
The JobClientActor is now repsonsible for receiving the JobStatus updates
from
a newly elected leader. It uses the LeaderRe
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-2846:
---
Summary: Emit checkpoint barriers earlier, before drawing the
state snapshot
Key: FLINK-2846
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2846
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14951068#comment-14951068
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2843:
---
GitHub user fhueske opened a pull request:
GitHub user fhueske opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1248
[FLINK-2843] Add documentation for outer joins.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/fhueske/flink outerJoinDocs
Alternatively you c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aljoscha Krettek reassigned FLINK-2845:
---
Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
> TimestampITCase.testWatermarkPropagation
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950933#comment-14950933
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2805:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the p
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1227#issuecomment-146954580
Looks good. I will rebase it on the latest state recovery branch and if
travis gives green light, then I'll merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950880#comment-14950880
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2354:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the p
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1153#issuecomment-146948889
I made some more fixes for the shading of the curator dependency. Once
Travis gives green light, I'll merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950838#comment-14950838
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2844:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1246#issuecomment-146941673
This should also remove all Jetty dependencies (runtime pom and root pom)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950829#comment-14950829
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2844:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1246#issuecomment-146940476
The WebFrontendITCase still needs to be adapted.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950787#comment-14950787
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2842:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull r
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1245#issuecomment-146934980
Thanks for the pointer. I removed the AWS dependency.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels closed FLINK-2730.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add CPU/Network utilization graphs to new web dashboard
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950783#comment-14950783
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2730:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1236
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user chiwanpark opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1247
[FLINK-2774] [scala shell] Import some Java and Core API classes
automatically
This PR adds some packages and classes into scala shell import list for
improving user experience. Please check the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske closed FLINK-687.
---
Resolution: Implemented
Assignee: Ricky Pogalz (was: Chiwan Park)
Fix Version/s: (w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske updated FLINK-2107:
-
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Sub-task)
Parent: (was: FLINK-687)
> Implement Hash Out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske updated FLINK-2576:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-apache)
0.10
> Add outer joins to API and Optimize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske reopened FLINK-2576:
--
> Add outer joins to API and Optimizer
>
>
> Ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske closed FLINK-2576.
Resolution: Fixed
> Add outer joins to API and Optimizer
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske closed FLINK-2576.
> Add outer joins to API and Optimizer
>
>
> Key: F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950685#comment-14950685
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-2576:
--
Implemented via b00c1d7e7b83a3f2e42223fe97dd3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske resolved FLINK-2576.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Add outer joins to API and Optimizer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chiwan Park reassigned FLINK-2774:
--
Assignee: Chiwan Park
> Import Java API classes automatically in Flink's Scala shell
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950652#comment-14950652
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2730:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1236#issuecomment-146922016
Merging this after a final test...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146918295
Good points.
I think that should do it, Sachin. Curious, how you'll implement it :)
Don't we run into the problem that we never know if another execution followed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950643#comment-14950643
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950637#comment-14950637
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2730:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1236#issuecomment-146915677
Build passes successfully. Looking forward to seeing this merged. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1245#issuecomment-146914047
sure, will do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950634#comment-14950634
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950633#comment-14950633
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2842:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull r
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146914064
There are three root causes(please add if I've missed any.)
1. Call to execute twice
2. Access job execution results.
3. Executing one of the eager exec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950629#comment-14950629
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vasia Kalavri resolved FLINK-2782.
--
Resolution: Done
> Remove deprecated features for 0.10
> ---
>
>
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146913514
IMO even removing the detached mode might be better than restricting to
`Program` interface. Instead of failing late in the execution, or with a
non-informative w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vasia Kalavri resolved FLINK-2784.
--
Resolution: Done
> Remove deprecated config keys
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950625#comment-14950625
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2842:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vasia Kalavri resolved FLINK-2833.
--
Resolution: Done
> Unstage Gelly and Module refactoring
>
>
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1245#issuecomment-146912958
Looks good.
Can you also remove the AWS tools dependency in the flink-runtime POM?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950616#comment-14950616
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146912518
We can go with the `Program` interface ,but I think that is such a heavy
restriction that this effectively renders the feature useless...
---
If your project is set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950613#comment-14950613
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2833:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950614#comment-14950614
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2784:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1244
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1241
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146911998
With proper documentation, failing on the second execute could be an
acceptable workaround but it's bound to cause trouble. In addition we might
want to warn users on the co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950611#comment-14950611
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950605#comment-14950605
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146911063
I think we need to ensure that interactive programs which can execute
successfully should still be allowed.
What I proposed should work. I can push a commit an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2798:
--
Summary: Prepare new web dashboard for executing it on YARN (was: Prepare
new web dashb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950601#comment-14950601
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146909986
I would solve it pragmatically and simply make the Program interface a
requirement for detached programs. Otherwise, fail with an explanation.
---
If your project is set up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950589#comment-14950589
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146909628
This will fail hard when users rely on the result of the first job. So
imagine your program always worked. You submit it detached and then it fails
after 12 hours when the f
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146908658
The way we do this with the Optimizer plan is a bit pragmatic. We wick the
first runnable part and use that. We could do the same here. Detached mode
would submit th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950581#comment-14950581
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950577#comment-14950577
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2844:
---
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1246
[FLINK-2844][jobmanager] remove old web interface
The new web interface supports all features of the old web interface once
#1164 and #1233 have been merged. It's time to remove the old one.
You can me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias J. Sax updated FLINK-2845:
---
Description:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/84479912
{noformat}
Tests run: 8, Failure
Matthias J. Sax created FLINK-2845:
--
Summary: TimestampITCase.testWatermarkPropagation
Key: FLINK-2845
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2845
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950566#comment-14950566
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2842:
---
GitHub user fhueske opened a pull request:
GitHub user fhueske opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1245
[FLINK-2842] [documentation] Remove Flink S3FileSystem
Extend documentation to use Hadoop S3FileSystem.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://gith
Maximilian Michels created FLINK-2844:
-
Summary: Remove old web interface and default to the new one
Key: FLINK-2844
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2844
Project: Flink
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950557#comment-14950557
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2784:
---
Github user vasia commented on the pull req
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1244#issuecomment-146903415
I'll merge this one too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950556#comment-14950556
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2833:
---
Github user vasia commented on the pull req
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1241#issuecomment-146902805
:dancers: :tada: :fireworks: merging ^^
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user greghogan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1191#discussion_r41641649
--- Diff:
flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/aggregation/SumAggregationFunction.java
---
@@ -113,11 +182,32 @@ public Long getAggregate() {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950553#comment-14950553
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146901927
That won't suffice. Even if we allow one execute call, we cannot be sure
that user won't try to access the `JobExecutionResult`. That also is an issue.
Disallo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950546#comment-14950546
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2725:
---
Github user greghogan commented on a diff i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950540#comment-14950540
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146899718
OKnow I'm confused. This PR was all about disallowing "multiple round
trips" and that's what Sachin tried to solve. Failing all interactive programs
detached is a quick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950536#comment-14950536
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-146898360
When we grab the Optimizer Plan from interactive programs, we also have a
similar problem - we would in theory need to execute the whole program. What we
do instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950533#comment-14950533
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2797:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
