> use a slightly modified version of the open tag, for example <*php, etc. This satisfies several desires: we don't want an extra
> line of boilerplate code like 'use PHP 6' to be required in every
> source file, we want a PHP 5 file to run without modification, and we
> want a PHP 6 file to be ab
ng is that: IF you want to keep the old way of doing
things around instead of removing them, it should be "change
settings/tag/whatever so it work as the old way" and not "change it so
it works the new way", that was my only point.
Cheers
Daniel Macedo
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
l, instead of living in an ever
more complex compatibility hurt fest that exists on other platforms...
Cheers,
Daniel Macedo
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Johannes:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:50:47PM +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>
> unsigned long length
>
> The width of the field. This corresponds to the display length,
> in bytes.
>
> The server determines the length value before it generates the
> resu
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anybody know who is responsible the snaps.php.net machine? It seems
> to be serving 5.4 builds under then name of php-trunk and that confuses
> people. Not only we don't have "trunk" as such since the move to git,
> people expect
Hi George:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:53:29AM -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote:
>
> E_STRICT isn't part of E_ALL and isn't on by default.
Just to be clear, E_STRICT is off by default in 5.0 but on by default in
5.1.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N
Hi Zeev:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 12:59:31PM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Where do you see that? As far as I can tell it certainly looks off by
> default even in 5.1.
http://cvs.php.net/php-src/php.ini-recommended#rev1.173
That change is still in there as version 1.176, which was used for the
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:31:08PM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:
>
> It is not about the fact we 'can' load the class, but that we dont
> 'want' to load the class.. - it's a waste of resources, memory, cpu etc.
> just for the sake of CS perfection..
Hear, hear!
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:07:27PM -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote:
>
> if(class_exists('MyFoo') && $obj instanceof MyFoo) { }
Unfortunately, class_exists() still calls __autoload(). Un-deprecating
is_a() seems to be an easy way to resolve this situation.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:03:06AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 12:38:49 AM, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:07:27PM -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> >>
> >> if(class_exists('MyFoo') && $obj instanceof MyFoo) { }
> >
> > Unfortunately, class_exists() stil
Hi:
It would be nice if PHP could not get tripped up by "http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=25987
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave
within capabilities.
Thanks,
Daniel Flick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
helgi (dufus) sez:
http://www.php.net/cvs-php.php ask for a CVS user and mention you need
karma for pear/Validate, but I guess the pear group will give the karma but php
group accept the user
Just mention that Helgi (cvs user dufuz) told you to get a user to
maintain Validate_AU
do the same
Hi Edin, et al:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:59:16PM +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>
> PHP
> will produce parse error if you have short tags enabled when trying to
> parse xml, while with short tags disabled and asp tags enabled it parses
> them just fine which makes it sweet for making templating
Hi Peter:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:22:32AM +0100, Peter Brodersen wrote:
> I don't think anybody disagrees about this. I'm just curious about
> documenting some recommendations.
If you have some suggestions for documentation improvements, make a patch
against http://cvs.php.net/phpdoc/en/featu
Hi Marcus:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:58:16AM +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>
> To second this, the xml standard allows any name after ' instruction. Widely in use is for example ' special treatment for java stuff in PHP? ;-)
First, PHP scripts are not XML files, so why are we concerned with wha
Hi Folks:
While trying to compile 5.0.5 from CVS on a Tao Linux box I'm getting a
"multiple definition of `pcre_module_entry'" error. Things compile just
fine in PHP 5.1.1 from CVS. Here's my configure line:
./configure --with-apxs --with-mysqli=/usr/local/bin/mysql_config \
--with-curl --ena
Hi Anthony:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:45:28AM +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Remove ext/pcre/config.m4 and run ./cvsclean && ./buildconf
Thanks. Did the trick.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
#x27;t know how much
more of a pain it would be to target that, or if it would cause
long-term issues or detriment to the progress.
--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272
[mobile] (570-) 766-8107
Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Then you'll find out he was
allerg
, as you
suggested in your post, unless your "old one" was that defective in
the first place and was inadvertently replaced by the "new one". ;-P
Before you make a public post demeaning the community that drives
the project you are using, no doubt, to help put food on your ta
I am maintainer of PEAR::DB_NestedSet2
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
,
> > Siva
> >
>
>
> --
> John Mertic
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://jmertic.wordpress.com
>
> "Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you understand it
> better, but the frog dies
> in the process." --Mark Twain
>
> --
> PHP Interna
gt; >
>
>
>
> --
> It looked like something resembling white marble, which was
> probably what it was: something resembling white marble.
>-- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy"
>
--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272
[mobile]
freely to create derivative works from said code, et cetera.
Of course, it does lay the groundwork for new licensing in the
future, whereby this project could eventually take on more and more of
PHP, until a project that began as open source joins the ranks as a
commercial competitor to ASP an
from the snow outside), I took a better look at the whole
thing. That, coupled with your responses (thank you, Rasmus, Marcus,
and Derick), gives a much clearer picture. What concerns me now is
that I - and I'm sure many others - wasn't even aware of this until
this thread popped up. I
Zend Software Architect
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
> (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
It would certainly be cheaper than the $3.3 Billion they bid for Lotus.
P.S. - Apparently sarcasm isn't always read as such. I may have
used a sarcasm-less MIME type
eph
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
> Ok this is driving me nuts:
>
> http://url.ie/730
> or
> http://tinyurl.com/2242cf
>
>
d was that
Pierre was inferring that it's more important for the community to
have standardized guidelines for contributions, rather than bend to
the whim of one party: in this case, IBM.
--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272
[mobile] (570-) 766-8107
If at first you don't su
try that signed
on with the Berne Convention. The only reason one would want to
register the Copyright (in the United States) would be if there was
anticipated infringement for which the author or Copyright holder
would be eligible for legal recourse.
http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-gene
than Perl. You guys
saved my ass a bunch of times without even knowing me!
We now return you to your regularly-scheduled debate thread.
--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272
[mobile] (570-) 766-8107
If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that yo
ote: the increased memory footprint and
> performance loss also exists with the collection itself turned off). We
> can turn it on when we're in dev for snapshots so that we iron out bugs.
> That said, as you can see from the results most people and real-life
> applications will be wor
That looks great, Andi.
Thanks.
On Dec 3, 2007 4:38 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry about that. Does the attached PDFed screenshot work for you?
>
> Andi
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Markus,
If for some reason the PDF attachment didn't come through to you
on the list, let me know and I'll upload it to one of my servers for
you to download and use, as well.
On Dec 3, 2007 4:40 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks great, A
ick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
>
I didn't think it would work on the list, but I figured if Andi
either sent it to me, or clicked Reply-All, either way it would be
delivered directly to my inbox, which it was. So now it's here:
http
nal
> programmers.
In the general scope, Ron, you're correct. Where I think this
could really shine is on a shared hosting server, where you may have
dozens - even hundreds - of small, novice web sites, all "programmed
real good-like".
--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 5
> suprised such a basic command wasn't there.. currently the only way I
> can see to do it would be to eval.. which isn't the most secure method
> for such a basic need.
>
> Regards
>
> Nathan
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To
ck on the status of the account?
--
Daniel P. Brown
[Phone Numbers Go Here!]
[They're Hidden From View!]
If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you
can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On Dec 12, 2007 10:33 AM, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20.11.2007 21:57, Daniel P. Brown wrote:
> > Assisting with maintenance of the php.net site, documentation,
> > and bug fixes, as well as further developing the runtime and
> > including bundled pa
- and get a feel for - those who actively post on this
list as it is? By only allowing them to read the threads posted,
without the ability to ask questions, it's like reading a manual. And
how often does the discussion in a published book evolve without
requiring a full reprint?
--
Daniel P. Bro
to only current PHP
developers (which I wholeheartedly think is a Bad Idea[TM]), you're
still going to have SNR issues because the developers will still be
going back-and-forth. It happens an ALL mailing lists --- even the
IETF lists (though there, at least, it's very self-regulated, at
easy example
or a screenshot or something better for learning.
Ahh and very important!!! If build the dll how can to use in php??
Thanks a lot for everything Happy Holidays!!
Atte:
Daniel Rivas
Cyberia Software
ng out all conditions for $_POST, $_GET, $_SESSION, $_COOKIE
It's certainly not 100% advantageous, but that's the reason why we
make the Big Bucks[tm], right?
*cough* Right?
/me cries softly in the corner.
--
Daniel P. Brown
[Phone Numbers Go Here!]
[They're Hidde
On Jan 6, 2008 5:06 AM, Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> > It may be off-topic for the initial post, but I disagree
> > wholeheartedly with the above statement, Stefan. There are
> > innumerable reasons where $_REQUEST would be much more ec
e wondering how well
it would really be adopted due to the initial difficulty in
recognizing the structure to the ternary operator. Unless it's an
obvious condition and result, ternary operation itself is equally - if
not more - trivial to initially figure out than $a = [1,2,3];.
--
D
ther option is to be added.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek and #1 Rated "Year's Coolest Guy" By Self Since
Nineteen-Seventy-[mumble].
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
> functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
Personally....
+1
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP Inter
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
> > functions in HEAD/php6 but ret
ction won't instantly break all
legacy scripts. As Hannes and I were discussing off-list, I feel it's
something that should be removed in a Generation 7 or 8 release, but
with the function availability still existing in PHP5, I believe it's
too soon.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior
Bah. You're right. I glanced over it.
Guess my Russian's not as good as I thought it was to miss a city
name like that.
On Feb 7, 2008 10:43 AM, Vesselin Kenashkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> location: г. Москва
>
> in translation: city of Moscow
>
>
нняя активность и эмоциональный тон,
> как залог деловой и личной эффективности. Управление скрытым потенциалом
> своих возможностей. Информацию можно получить по телефонам: (495) 742 9I 98,
> 967 68 22X298WI4
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
g it
open means that ALL people involved and with more than just a passing
interest can get involved in the C part of the RFC.
If it goes through, feel free to count me in as a volunteer to
moderate submissions, vandalism, and such.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP Interna
This extension needs some work of someone who has enough insight in the *deep*
internals of
zend-engine. Multi-threading is possible with an extension like this but it
should only be enabled in
CLI.
Kind regards,
Daniel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscr
functions, classes, variables, resources, et cetera, are
added to the language and, in turn, the website.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
this will help you, but this is something I came
across last night while working on a way to create a 100% mobile
server and website on my Windows Mobile Treo (purely for geek
purposes). I haven't had the chance to play with it, but if nothing
else, it may give you some ideas.
Pocket HP
ford the box and bandwidth as it is, because the Wiki idea - as I
think others may agree - is an excellent step toward the future of the
development of PHP. So it's not an unselfish move on my part.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
7;d been missing a lot of the discussion somehow, I
didn't know that it was still moving forward.
Thanks again, to both of you.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I'm in the middle of clarifying the Overloading section of the manual,
http://docs.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php. Some issues
and questions have come up and your insights will be helpful, please.
* The docs say "All overloading methods must be defined as public." At
this poin
[Hmm... No answer in several days. Let's try this again with a
different subject]
I'm in the middle of clarifying the Overloading section of the manual,
http://docs.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.overloading.php. Some issues
and questions have come up and your insights will be helpful, please
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Alain Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears that my server bounced a mail from one of the servers that manages
> this list.
>
> This was because 216.92.131.4 is in a black list at dynablock.njabl.org
>
> Someone might want to check.
[snip!]
Looks
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Google just announced the final assignments for their Summer of Code
> program for this year.
> On behalf of the PHP project I'd like to welcome our students and give
> you some general information about the
Of interesting note: the list rejected my earlier (second) reply
to your message, Johannes. It claimed the Google BlogSpot URL was a
SPAMMY URL.
--
Dedicated Servers - Intel 2.4GHz w/2TB bandwidth/mo. starting at just
$59.99/mo. with no contract!
Dedicated servers, VPS, and hosting from $2.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> start 326616
> GET 327256
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> GET 327276
> POST 327516
> POST 327588
> POST 327652
> POST 327712
> POST 327892
> POST
Hi Marcus:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:57:22AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Saturday, April 5, 2008, 3:27:33 PM, you wrote:
>
> We experimented with visibility and ran into trouble.
...
> So we in fact note the visibility but then ignore it.
>
> I think we either need to respect the visibility
Hi Lars:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Lars Strojny wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 09:27:33AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> > * The new __callStatic() is neat. Thanks. Is there consideration of
> > adding Static versions of the other overloading methods?
Hi Marcus (and Sara):
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 06:48:48PM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>
> That said there is a bug in __callStatic which we need to
> report and assign to Sara.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=45089
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Richard Quadling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If not having the OS option means more windows bugs will be fixed as the
> core-devs won't know if it is *nix or windows, then don't ask for the OS.
> (He he).
Please, Rich. Even Microsoft isn't capable of that!
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 05:55:49PM -0500, Ralph Schindler wrote:
> In PHP 5.3 snaps, it appears that magic methods __isset, __unset, __get,
> __set must have a public visibility or the engine will trigger a
> warning. Why is this? It works as expected in 5.x branches.
Because that's what the
Folks:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:24:25PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> functions/features now throwing E_DEPRECATED) is missing...
I just added the E_DEPRECATED constant to errorfunc.constants.php. Now
we need to make sure that each function that error has been applied to
has it's manual p
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:30:43PM +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> I don't see big problems with closures. The patch is simple and stable.
While you're probably right, it seems there is still lots of discussion
about how closures should work. It seems better to get this right in a
later version t
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm with Derick here. We should push out new releases when there are security
> issues
As am I. The EOL announcement itself justifies the release:
"We will continue to make critical security fixes available on
Just a quick note to whomever did the mail server configuration:
After a [enhancement pill name here] SPAM message "from" me (not
really, but you know what I mean) hit the Internals list and bounced
back, I saw the 550.
"550: we're manly enough already"
Nice. That made my mornin
Hi Gergely:
> foo.php:
> throw new Exception();
> class foo {}
>
> bar.php:
> class bar extends foo {}
>
> function __autoload($className)
> {
> include $className.'.php';
> }
> function error_handler()
> {
> throw new Exception();
> }
> set_error_handler("error_handler");
> new b
Hi Gergely:
> You totally missed the point. Please try the code first. I didn't write
> but I thought that it is obvious that the files are in the same directory.
The error was clear: the file containing the class foo was not found. But
before I made my post, I did run your test, just to make s
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:09:33PM -0700, Christopher Jones wrote:
>
> For PHP 5.3 on, I'd be happy to see the Windows builds of PDO_OCI only
> produce php_pdo_oci.dll and no longer also build php_pdo_oci8.dll.
> The latter uses an older set of Oracle client libraries that allows
> connections to
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi everbody,
>>
>> regarding my mail from yesterday, I've also created an RFC for the new
>> error level.
+1
Sorry, I thought I'd already
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the
> point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some
> volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and al
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd love to see this conversion. Let's make sure we get enough folks to
> volunteer to check the history of our source trees although we should in
> any case keep the CVS one around for browsing "just in case"...
Is thi
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Richard Quadling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As a windows user my observations/opinions are ...
taken with a grain of salt. ;-P
Isn't discussion about how to add on to SVN and which tools will
be better-suited for development a decade from now cou
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Barry Carlyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was suggested that students write about what they have done and what they
> aim to achieve by the end
Can you name specifically three things you've learned during the
first half of the summer that you didn't know be
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Barry Carlyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) working with object orientated properly, writing classes and the like,
> this is my first time using classes that I have written,
> 2) working with version control, git and cvs, I publish to my git local
> repo, and then
Hi Dmitry:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:01:24AM -, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
... snip ...
> - Fixed bug #43817 (opendir() fails on Windows directories with parent
> directory unaccessible).
... snip ...
Can you please merge this down to 5.2?
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N
Hi Anthony:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:01:11PM +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 13.08.2008 04:38, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> >Hi Dmitry:
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:01:24AM -, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >>
> >... snip ...
> >> - Fixed bug #43817
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:32:37PM +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 13.08.2008 17:51, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> >
> >43817 is definitely a regression bug. Things worked correctly in 5.2.1
> >and then got broken in 5.2.2.
>
> Merging brand new realpath() implementat
Hi Hannes:
> Doesn't look like there will be a new 5.2 release any time soon
I've heard THAT one before. :)
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
it possible to activate this extension by default since it is the same
source like "normal" pdo_sqlite?
kind regards,
Daniel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
The VC9 builds
>are working without issue.
Yes, but "VC9 x86 builds, not compabitible with official apache releases".
Thats why I'm asking
for sqlite_external for getting into 5.3 snaps-build again.
Regards,
Daniel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
st for my companies applications).
As I found out now XML-support is gone also... ("Class 'DomDocument' not found")
Thanks so far.
Kind regards,
Daniel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
>Are you using the PHP 5.3 builds for VC9 from windows.php.net - but the
>apachelounge build of the apache server
Yes.
> using the alpha2 for vc9 domdocument works for me
Thats right, CLI and vc6 are fine with xml-support.
Regards,
Daniel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime De
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I strongly disagree, for two reasons:
>
> 1. We are going to release an alpha3, that's the perfect time for such change
> 2. The OB code is messy right now, Mike's work cleaned it up and makes
> it more maintainable. 5.3 is
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:07:10PM +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Yes. Changing :: into any other separator solves the functions/static
> methods and constants ambiguity, but it also breaks intuitive syntax.
Which is more important? Considering there have been threads upon
threads filled with my
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:47:30AM +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >
> > 3. Functions will not be allowed inside namespaces. We arrived to
> > conclusion that they are much more trouble than they're worth, and
> > summarily we would be better off without them. Most of the
Hi Greg:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 09:58:25PM -0500, Gregory Beaver wrote:
>
> The second highest vote was :::, but there was strong objection to this
> as well from some.
Sounds like you have the tally or know where it is (or you have an
excellent memory). Do you have a URI for it, please?
Reg
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:51:04AM +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> On 30.09.2008, at 05:36, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> I linked to one tally (not sure if its the final one) in my recent
> email:
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=113313170231815&w=2
Thanks.
>
Hannes,
I think both Thiago and Elizabeth are correct. Call me old-hat: I
prefer CVS but I'm well aware that it's a daunting task to learn
that new technology for people who would otherwise not use it. In
fact, most projects - including PHP - are moving away from CVS, in
favor of SVN
Hi Jaris:
> I don't know if I'm using json_encode for something it's not supposed to
> do. I'm using it to serialize an object to send it to another
> runtime-environment in response to an remote call, just like what I can
> do with SOAP, REST or RMI. In this context I don't see much sense i
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was hoping to have at least 30 respondees at this stage, but actually have
> 29 (and that includes Hannes' abstention). However, to keep y'all up to
> date, here's where we're up to with Greg's proposals.
Sorry for comi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Chris Stockton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm going to stop this tally at 50 responses. That should be enough to show
>> us where people generally are coming from.
There are about six total concurrent threads on this right now.
Would it make sense to create
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/18 Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - yes in
>> both suggestions.
>
> Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read?
Is that
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the same as just making internals@ read-only. Once we have an
> internals-core, many core people will just unsubscribe from the internals
> list. I know I probably would. And once the core developers no longer
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Read the whole thread before posting please:
>
>> "external" patches and "general" discussions would still be on the
>> internals@ list, as it would be the main discussion list.
I have been reading the entire thre
101 - 200 of 814 matches
Mail list logo
