Hi Greg:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 09:58:25PM -0500, Gregory Beaver wrote:
>
> The second highest vote was :::, but there was strong objection to this
> as well from some.
Sounds like you have the tally or know where it is (or you have an
excellent memory). Do you have a URI for it, please?
Regardless of opposition, it did get the second highest vote count, so
has support from several people.
> The problem, I still believe, is that we are focused
> on having the same:::stupid:::operator:::between:::everything.
...
> In truth, it will be a lot easier to debug code if this is a different
> separator, as the boundary between namespace and element will be crystal
> clear. For instance:
...
> my::framework..someFunction()->aProperty->someMethod();
Good points. And thanks for the patch. (Perhaps we can harness the vast
amounts of energy inside Greg to resolve our oil dependence?)
Regardless of whether we use the same separator between
namespaces and the elements or if we just use a different separator
between namespaces and the elements, some separator needs to change.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
