Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.0.4 won't compile as per your instructions

2005-04-05 Thread Steph
erm - when was the decision to no longer maintain the .dsp files made? Did I go to sleep? - Original Message - From: "Uwe Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff Beidler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cc: "Jeff Beidler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 11:38 PM Subject: Re: [PH

Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.0.4 won't compile as per your instructions

2005-04-06 Thread Steph
I seem to recall this discussion from days of yore. And the word was, 'nope, don't let the things wallow in historical mire, for many do use them'. I'll add it to the TODO (which is starting to look almost possible again). > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Steph wrote: > > >

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1

2005-06-06 Thread Steph
Animated .gif support? :) - Original Message - From: "Pierre-Alain Joye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Zülke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:57:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Zülke) wrote: > How abo

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 (closed)

2005-06-08 Thread Steph
Ah, but is it the thread it was? :) - Original Message - From: "Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andrei Zmievski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:14 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 (closed) > On Wed,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Win9x support in PHP

2005-07-16 Thread Steph
against what is now pecl/printer, and dated 1993. So yep - I'd say go for it, too. - Steph - Original Message - From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "PHPdev" Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 3:3

Fw: [PHP-DEV] Win9x support in PHP

2005-07-16 Thread Steph
erm, for 1993 please read 2003 :-) - Original Message - From: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "PHPdev" Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:57 PM Subject: R

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/date...

2005-07-21 Thread Steph
ther than a political decision, and it makes me very uneasy. Please - any dev - feel free to explain how I'm seeing it all wrong, preferably in words of one syllable. (Derick: polite ones? ;) - Steph - Original Message - From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/date...

2005-07-21 Thread Steph
I couldn't agree more, Wez - but this is the problem I'm seeing. What chance is there of working it out together when all discussion on the topic has been effectively overruled? If this ever gets to be the standard approach to PHP development, we'll have utter chaos. The last word on the subject

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/date...

2005-07-21 Thread Steph
ee 5.1.0 stable and 'out there' before opening this can of worms. > We can > refrain from uncommenting that code until we reach an agreement. It shouldn't even be there until there is agreement... - Steph > > Andi > > > At 03:09 PM 7/21/2005 +0100, Steph wrote:

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] cgi dates

2005-08-02 Thread Steph
I missed one...Index: sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c === RCS file: /repository/php-src/sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c,v retrieving revision 1.266 diff -u -r1.266 cgi_main.c --- sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c 16 Jun 2005 14:54:51 - 1.266 +++ sapi/cgi/cgi_main.

Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting throwing a fatal error

2005-08-24 Thread Steph
but IMO it's less elegant. What do others think? > If it counts for anything, I'm with Zeev over this one. I think version compatibility's likely to become an issue in unexpected ways, and also the meaning of E_USER_ERROR is less intuitive because it wouldn't behave in a s

Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting throwing a fatal error

2005-08-24 Thread Steph
Hi Rasmus, > Steph wrote: > > If there's the capability to run PHP 6 without Unicode support, surely > > there's no reason for extensions to lose back compatability when they're > > updated...? > > That's going to be tough. They will definitely l

Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting throwing a fatal error

2005-08-24 Thread Steph
ing > intelligent when passed an IS_UNICODE string. IS_UNICODE strings don't > just exist when unicode semantics are turned on either. So it actually > doesn't matter if that switch is on or not, extensions should handle > Unicode strings. OK, thanks for the clarification. -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Unicode-compatible extensions (was Re: [PHP-DEV] type hintingthrowing a fatal error)

2005-08-24 Thread Steph
on't_ use zend_parse_parameters()? I mean, it's been around for a long time now... - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] XML URIs and streams

2005-08-25 Thread Steph
Rob, hi, You never committed this (or anything else in ext/libxml since then as far as I can see) - do you still intend to? - Steph-working-on-backlog-and-will-shoot-the-next-person-to-ask - Original Message - From: "Rob Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday,

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist

2005-08-27 Thread Steph
Yep. I saw this happening during the PHP 5 coding contest we held last year at Zend - some people used short open tags so I had to have that 'on' in my php.ini to test, but having it 'on' screwed the entries that used XML, so I was forever switching short open tags off and on. I was supposed to p

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear?

2005-08-28 Thread Steph
'Replace'? Code written for ext/xmlrpc won't work with ext/xmlrpci. Will ext/xmlrpc be available in PECL, given that it doesn't appear to have an active maintainer? I'm well aware of ext/xmlrpc's limitations, haven't tried the new (but necessary) pecl/xmlrpci yet, and have the tiny issue that a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear?

2005-08-29 Thread Steph
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 16:23 +0200, Steph wrote: > > 'Replace'? Code written for ext/xmlrpc won't work with ext/xmlrpci. Will > > ext/xmlrpc be available in PECL, given that it doesn't appear to have an > > active maintainer? > > Sure it'll

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear?

2005-08-29 Thread Steph
> > That's fair enough, so long as the older version is readily available. It > > becomes a problem if it isn't. The word 'replace' kind of intimates that > > the original extension is effectively a goner - and if you meant 'replace in > > the core', I'm unaware of a precedent for that. > > Yes.

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist

2005-08-31 Thread Steph
> Let's please stop breaking things just because we find them > aesthetically displeasing. *hug* > -adam -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handlingchangeand PHP 4.4.0)

2005-09-15 Thread Steph
Leigh, that's kinda the point (and to some degree the problem). This is not a job. > If you don't know why it's wrong to tell them they are stupid, and can't > be bother spending an extra 10 seconds formulating a respectable > response instead, then you are the wrong person for the job. > -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handlingchange and PHP 4.4.0)

2005-09-16 Thread Steph
Nicely said, Adam. - Original Message - From: "Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Leigh Makewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:48 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference handlingchange and PHP 4.4.0) > On Th

Fw: [PHP-DEV] Issues with PHP 5 on Windows 98

2005-09-27 Thread Steph
oops, wrong button... - Original Message - From: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:46 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Issues with PHP 5 on Windows 98 > Hi Andreas, > > We haven

Re: [PHP-DEV] timezones & date() breakage

2005-09-28 Thread Steph
This is probably a stupid question, but why isn't there a default setting? And why can't the missing default setting be set by the system date() data? - Original Message - From: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, September

Re: [PHP-DEV] timezones & date() breakage

2005-09-28 Thread Steph
So you're saying this issue's going to be history by the time 5.1 is due for release? - Original Message - From: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PHP-DEV] timezones & date() breakage

2005-09-28 Thread Steph
> I wouldn't call it broken, just less inituitive. But besides that point, > I looked at some data and have a patch that allows the timezone guessing > code to also check against the GMT offset, and not only the > abbreviation. This means that with these DB entries: > > { "idt", 1, -HOUR (

Re: [PHP-DEV] timezones & date() breakage

2005-09-28 Thread Steph
hmm but if Derick's picking up the name of the tz the way he suggested and printing it as part of an E_STRICT we'll soon get clear reports of any exceptions to the rule. - Original Message - From: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "PHP D

[PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions?

2005-10-01 Thread Steph
? My own feeling is that RCs shouldn't be announced in this way, but I know you all want a broad test base for them. Perhaps we could make them available via a separate download page with a header and text making it fully clear these are not PHP releases? - Steph - Original Message -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions?

2005-10-01 Thread Steph
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "internals" Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:45 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions? > > This has NOT been the policy. The person who came up with > thi

Re: [PHP-DEV] $ref =& $this;

2005-10-04 Thread Steph
7;re one of the good guys, I know you work like stink on the project and I know half of what you say is tongue-in-cheek - but who else knows it? Beside all that stuff, Jani, it's a Jewish religious holiday. You're attacking people who aren't around to defend themselves. How

Re: [PHP-DEV] $ref =& $this;

2005-10-05 Thread Steph
ey > skipped out. Actually, this October the holidays pretty much _are_ 3 weeks long... and FWIW I don't think you see one half of the work 'they' do until it's done. - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: $ref =& $this;

2005-10-05 Thread Steph
7;ve already started working on some but holidays... I'd > appreciate help). I agree, and I'd be more than happy to work on that. Can you commit what you have? - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Providing Visual Studio 2005 builds (again)

2007-11-13 Thread Steph
visible difference to PHP-GTK's draw speed. And please note, even the 'NTS' option has proved confusing for some...! - Steph On Nov 13, 2007 5:34 AM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Elizabeth, > > No doubt there's value in providing a non-threadsafe buil

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Optional scalar type hinting

2008-01-03 Thread Steph
type hinting for scalars without a mandate, and there doesn't appear to be one right now. If it _is_ accepted it'll most likely be in PHP 6 not 5.3 anyway, because 5.3's features were agreed (and limited) a couple of months ago. - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Optional scalar type hinting

2008-01-03 Thread Steph
7;ve heard from 3 internals developers (I missed Pierre's mail earlier) in a thread that has gathered over 60 emails in - in my timezone - a single evening. Most of the dev team won't have time to read such a long thread... - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailin

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) / UPGRADING

2009-03-25 Thread Steph
Hannes Magnusson wrote: 2009/1/28 Steph Fox : sfoxWed Jan 28 17:23:28 2009 UTC Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3) /php-srcUPGRADING Log: - Skeleton version taken directly from the scratchpad and tidied. @Lukas, Johannes: This is nowhere near complete, and may

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) / UPGRADING

2009-03-25 Thread Steph
Hannes Magnusson wrote: And now to the list too *sigh*, sorry Steph :) I did wonder :) On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 13:49, Steph wrote: Hannes Magnusson wrote: 2009/1/28 Steph Fox : sfoxWed Jan 28 17:23:28 2009 UTC Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3) /php-src

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) / UPGRADING

2009-03-25 Thread Steph
Hi Lukas, all, Well the last thread on the topic ("5.3 todos") stopped with Steph explaining that there are 2 different documents, one the UPGRADING guide in php-src and one being the manual and that she intends to focus the UPGRADING guide to be short and to the point for sysadmi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Focus on HEAD

2009-03-27 Thread Steph
Felipe Pena wrote: Hello, just to inform, I've commited (yesterday) the patch removing the UG(unicode) checks, etc across all source (except mysql exts). As the patch has 492K, looks as no mail will be sent. I'd given up hope of ever seeing that reach CVS :) Thanks Felipe! - Step

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Type hints revisited [IllegalArgumentException instead of E_ERROR]

2003-03-28 Thread Steph
> Changing PHP's behavior with a different error level is only a tad bit > better than adding an INI directive. In general I'd like the core language > to behave the same no matter what error level or INI settings. > I say nuke type-hints and let the purists use instanceof. > > Andi > Speaking as

Re: [PHP-DEV] bison problems

2003-03-28 Thread Steph
FWIW the version I'm trying to force Edin to use for win32 builds is a messed-around-with 1.28 (ie that's fine here in the win32 corner ;) - Original Message - From: "Marcus Börger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:50 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] bison p

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patches for case insensitive in_array, bug id 12192

2003-03-30 Thread Steph
> > ATM, in_array() takes 2 args and 1 parameter. Adding 1 more > > wouldn't hurt, doesn't break BC, and provides some added > > usefulness. > > And slows down the inner loop of searching. > > > IMHO, this would be a handy feature, and if it > > were added I can't imagine having to extend in_arr

Re: [PHP-DEV] Patches for case insensitive in_array, bug id 12192

2003-03-30 Thread Steph
> Andrei: -1 > Ilia: -1 > Derick: -1 > Georg: -1 > Marcus: +0 > Moriyoshi: -1 > > Total: -5 > > So I marked it: Won't Fix > > Good experience thou =) > > > /Magnus Hrm, and next time I'll leave it til I've read to the end of the thread before I comment :-I -- PHP Intern

[PHP-DEV] [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] Syntactic improvement to array

2007-02-04 Thread Steph
I personally find array extremely clear, in recent weeks I had to do A LOT of JavaScript work where the array syntax works in a manner you suggest for PHP and its a massive pain. It does not make for a very clear code. I think the syntax you propose is extremely confusing and we should stick

[PHP-DEV] [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] Syntactic improvement to array

2007-02-04 Thread Steph
ax you propose is extremely confusing and we should stick to what we have right now. If someone does not like this new syntax, he can stick to array(). It is in no way an argument to refuse the new syntax addition. And what about maintenance? And what about the confusion for beginners? -

[PHP-DEV] [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] Syntactic improvement to array

2007-02-04 Thread Steph
cript there is only one option. That's the difference. - Steph -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D

[PHP-DEV] [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] Syntactic improvement to array

2007-02-04 Thread Steph
Fine, but in javascript there is only one option. That's the difference. - Steph a = Array(1,2,3) a = [1,2,3] I stand corrected. Apologies for the noise. - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) / run-tests.php

2007-02-09 Thread Steph
Good point. So if the decision is indeed to deprecate ereg, its time to mark it deprecated. And while we are at it .. lets introduce E_DEPRECATED as well :) Please do (Someone. I do realize Lukas can't.) - Steph regards, Lukas -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing

Re: [PHP-DEV] Documenting the Zend2 extension API

2007-04-25 Thread Steph
ource documentation on php.net. Please. It needs serious attention. If you just want glorification, forget it - one with far stronger credentials has gone before. - Steph - Original Message - From: "Gwynne Raskind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:45

Re: [PHP-DEV] Documenting the Zend2 extension API

2007-04-25 Thread Steph
- and that will teach me to read to the end of the thread before I respond. What Tony said :) - Original Message - From: "Antony Dovgal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gwynne Raskind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:51 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Documenting the Zen

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Merging patches to HEAD [ was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) / NEWS /ext/standard html.c html.h /ext/standard/tests/strings htmlentities18.phpt ]

2007-05-26 Thread Steph
nd either stick it online somewhere or mail it here? I can check which patches still haven't been merged and pass on those needing attention to folk with the appropriate karma. (i.e. 'not PDO' ;) I think everyone's just going to have to accept it isn't goi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Merging patches to HEAD [ was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) / NEWS /ext/standard html.c html.h /ext/standard/tests/strings htmlentities18.phpt ]

2007-05-26 Thread Steph
You ask and you shall receive :-) Thanks. I guess :) -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] better changeset tracking

2007-05-30 Thread Steph
imho a very bad thing to have three databases for bugs. Amen. - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] OK, who broke the build now?

2004-04-28 Thread Steph
worked fine yesterday.. (win98) -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] old build system

2004-06-07 Thread Steph
'The old build system' happens to be standard.. php-gtk for one relies at present on a standard PHP build rather than the new one. I doubt it's alone. > -Original Message- > From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 June 2004 17:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: old build system

2004-06-07 Thread Steph
> > And anybody who suggests removing Interbase will have a large section of > active Firebird users on their heads. > If you want to get rid of anything make it MySQL :) > We WILL produce a clean Firebird module to replace the current Interbase > one, but are waiting for PHP5 to be released before

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/mysqli mysqli_api.c

2004-06-08 Thread Steph
P-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/mysqli mysqli_api.c > > > Steph wrote: > > win32 build's failing now only on one export: > > Fails on 10 for me: > > mysqli.obj: error LNK2001: Unresolved external symbol _client_errors > mysqli_repl.obj: error LNK2019: Unresolved ext

[PHP-DEV] suddenly I have mysqli 4.1.2 lib & headers :)

2004-06-08 Thread Steph
Anyone want to play? - Steph DevZone Editor www.zend.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] [Fwd: php5 rc3 win32 mysqli-extension is missing]

2004-06-09 Thread Steph
FYI: Both the mssql and mysqli extensions missing from RC3 are now available on snaps.php.net. > -Original Message- > From: Antony Dovgal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 June 2004 10:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Fwd: php5 rc3 win32 mysqli-extension is missing]

[PHP-DEV] a very boring question about objects, and what's expected of them

2004-06-09 Thread Steph
, all seems well with direct inheritance (only) */ } new blah('blah - first param', 'blah - second param'); new sonOfBlah('sonOfBlah - first and only param'); $db = new DB(); $db2 = new secondDB('localhost', 'root', ''); print($db2->t

RE: [PHP-DEV] simplexml build broken

2004-06-13 Thread Steph
shouldn't there be an error message in that case? > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 June 2004 13:15 > To: Stanislav Malyshev > Cc: PHP Development > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] simplexml build broken > > > Hello Stanislav, > > libxml is configured

RE: [PHP-DEV] The open letter to Derick Rethans

2004-06-15 Thread Steph
> The next question is - are both PHP4 and PHP5 going to be run in > parallel, like Apache 1 and 2 so that neither gets finished ;) Darn.. y'mean PHP 4 isn't finished? ;) > > -- > Lester Caine > - > L.S.Caine Electronic Services > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runti

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP5 RC3

2004-06-20 Thread Steph
FYI (it'll save you looking): There are two branches in SQLite's CVS.. I believe that Derrell is referring to more recent releases of the stable 2.8.* branch rather than the alpha 3.* branch. The sqlite library currently bundled with PHP 5 is 3 version points behind the times and dates from last

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP5 RC3

2004-06-21 Thread Steph
short test script for the ATTACH command please? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 June 2004 14:04 > To: Marcus Boerger > Cc: Steph; Ilia Alshanetsky; Andi Gutmans; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP5 RC3 &

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP5 RC3

2004-06-24 Thread Steph
Hey Ilia, if I don't understand why you aren't helping, Derrell sure as heck won't! Has he updated the actual 2.8.14 library as opposed to the bundled lib, is that the problem? Aha! Wez just went by, saying 'SQLite update? It's mostly done, it can go in when I have inet access'. Better lend him

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] tidylib behaviour changed

2004-07-05 Thread Steph
Those methods work fine. The code's incorrect in your example; you were echoing the original string. > -Original Message- > From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 July 2004 10:48 > To: PHPdev > Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] tidylib behaviour changed > > > Hi, > > Finally today

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.0 Test roll

2004-07-13 Thread Steph
Ahh I had that yesterday, but only when a particular extension was built-in. So I blamed the extension.. What's your configure line? > -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sebastian Bergmann > Sent: 13 July 2004 12:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [

RE: [PHP-DEV] congrats and thanks

2004-07-15 Thread Steph
Guy, all, I hope nobody minds if I forward this to the phpdoc list where this will be fully appreciated ;) > -Original Message- > From: Guy N. Hurst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 July 2004 03:46 > To: PHPdev > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] congrats and thanks > > > Hi, > > I'd like to add

RE: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32

2004-07-19 Thread Steph
n external iconv.dll at runtime.. - Steph > -Original Message- > From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 July 2004 23:32 > To: Rob Richards > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32 > > > I've been using th

RE: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32

2004-07-20 Thread Steph
e reason the iconv > > exports were put there in the first place was so that the libxml build > could > > rely with confidence on there being built-in support for libxml's own > > built-in iconv functions through PHP, rather than having to lean on an > > external icon

RE: [PHP-DEV] WAHT about gd 2.0.28 and Gif support?

2004-07-28 Thread Steph
Stefan Esser already committed it to all branches.. > -Original Message- > From: Romain Bourdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 28 July 2004 13:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] WAHT about gd 2.0.28 and Gif support? > > > Hi, > > i saw that 07/21/04, gd 2.0.28 has been rele

RE: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator

2004-08-02 Thread Steph
> My opinion would be that goto isn't needed with the do..while() > statement.. > But on the other hand.. Neither for(), while() or do..while() would be > needed with goto, would they? I learned a language called PHP. It contains for(), while() and do..while(). I've been writing scripts that con

RE: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator

2004-08-02 Thread Steph
> My point still remains.. Goto is powerful, even if not needed.. There's > about one time I would use goto, which could easily be done with two > do..while().. The funny thing is, that I didn't do it that way, cause I > though it looked ugly. And my point still remains. There are an awful lot of

RE: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator

2004-08-02 Thread Steph
> My point was to say it's powerful, as powerful as all those, not that it > could replace them.. I would still use while(), do..while() and for() the > times they are intended for.. I'm sure most of the people would.. > There are > however situations where goto is what makes sense.. I'm still wai

RE: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator

2004-08-03 Thread Steph
Jochem: +1 :) > -Original Message- > From: Jochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 August 2004 01:22 > To: Sara Golemon > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator > > > I'm +1 on goto with static labels. > > regardless of whether it ends up in PHP or not I thin

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] fix symbol namespace pollution from bundled libgd

2004-08-04 Thread Steph
h versions of libgd are being used by other projects? There was a positive response to Joe's patch initially (off-list). Is anyone planning to adapt it for 5_0 branch before the 5.0.1 release, is it going to wait until 5.1, or is it now abandoned for some reason? Just wondering.. - S

RE: [PHP-DEV] Where can I apply for a PHP contract?

2004-08-04 Thread Steph
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, nsangineto wrote: > > Where can I apply for a PHP and also Java contract? > > What's a PHP contract? Sssh! They'll all want one! -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] sqlite object-level interface

2004-08-08 Thread Steph
; > > >>it is a public interface! Unfortunatley we still have no way of > documenting > >>classes on the docs page. > > > > Thanks. Steph forwarded me this link, which could be provided > on the docs > > page as additional reference, until there's

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] sqlite object-level interface

2004-08-08 Thread Steph
I will do. Did anyone remember that php-gtk-doc needs to align to this when they were designing it? > -Original Message- > From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 08 August 2004 19:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internals; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re:

RE: [PHP-DEV] new browscap INI parser...

2004-08-10 Thread Steph
> >I would think that sticking with the current ini files would > probably lead > >to less confusion. > > I second that... Just a quick note here - if this code gets taken on board, ext/standard/config.w32 and win32/php5dllts.dsp will need to be updated with the relevant sr

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: 5.0.1RC2

2004-08-12 Thread Steph
There's a (closed, not enough info) bug report on this: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29227 (just to confirm that there's an issue there at all) > -Original Message- > From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 August 2004 09:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PHP-D

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.h zend_execute.c

2004-08-19 Thread Steph
Not clearer to me :) If this was a big reason for reverting __toString() for 5.0.0, does it mean we're going to see it again soon as a result of this change? > -Original Message- > From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 August 2004 00:53 > To: Sterling Hughes > Cc: Andi G

[PHP-DEV] small and probably dodgy fix

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
Hi list, HEAD is broken for me following Derick's new sort flag addition earlier today. The attached one-liner may be a wrong fix, neither self nor D are sure. However it _does_ allow HEAD to build on my system! - Steph --- zend_config.w32.h Mon Sep 13 15:17:16 2004 +++ new_zend_config.

RE: [PHP-DEV] small and probably dodgy fix

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
dodgy fix > > > If that fixes it, doesn't that imply that other systems without > strcoll will also fail to build now? > (are there any that we care about?) > > --Wez. > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:21:14 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi list, >

RE: [PHP-DEV] small and probably dodgy fix

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
need a real fix :-) > > --Wez. > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:11:10 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > no, there's only win32 and netware that have config files in > the Zend dir. > > > > I put it in the wrong place, it needs to be just ahead of the

RE: [PHP-DEV] small and probably dodgy fix

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
ally undefined > HAVE_STRCOLL (to simulate not having it), will the build break? > > If so, then we need a real fix :-) > > --Wez. > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:11:10 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > no, there's only win32 and netware that have config f

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] ok this works in all cases and smells right

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
BTW shouldn't main/config.w32.h be in .cvsignore? - Steph Index: Zend/zend_config.w32.h === RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_config.w32.h,v retrieving revision 1.36 diff -u -r1.36 zend_config.w32.h --- Zend/zend_config.

RE: [PHP-DEV] HAVE_STRCOLL problem

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
No it doesn't, because there are other items in PHP that rely on HAVE_STRCOLL and need it to be defined where it currently is. So it needs to be redefined in zend_config.w32.h for Zend files, where this is its only occurrence. > -Original Message- > From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: [PHP-DEV] small and probably dodgy fix

2004-09-13 Thread Steph
We had this discussion on irc already. The Zend files change is necessary for Windows. The other change I submitted prevents the problem of not being able to build PHP on systems where STRCOLL is not available. Submit! > -Original Message- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] round 3

2004-09-14 Thread Steph
Moved #if a few paces to the left on Wez's advice. Fussy old compilers ;) Still does the same job (fixes win32 build and all builds where there is no strcoll), only this time without breaking otherwise happy builds. - Steph Index: Zend/zend_config.

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] round 3

2004-09-14 Thread Steph
Sent: 14 September 2004 17:21 > To: Steph > Cc: internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] round 3 > > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Steph wrote: > > > Moved #if a few paces to the left on Wez's advice. Fussy old > compilers ;) > > > > Still does the same job

RE: [PHP-DEV] Snaps.php.net

2004-09-15 Thread Steph
That's because nobody applied the fix after D's patch yet. > -Original Message- > From: David Kingma - Jool.nl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 September 2004 12:03 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Snaps.php.net > > > Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but the win3

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_win.exe crashes when in a directory with spaces

2004-10-03 Thread Steph
Hi Rubem, Please could you re-post your mail to either [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] This discussion does not belong on the core PHP internals list. - Steph - Original Message - From: "Rubem Pechansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 roadmap

2004-10-23 Thread Steph
Georg, I have to back Wez up over this. I was 'around' for the LT discussions both last year and this year, and I know exactly when PDO reached PECL CVS. What happened here? - Steph - Original Message - From: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Georg

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_fork();

2004-11-14 Thread Steph
It's not easy to support something that doesn't exist... - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "overight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 5:49 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php_fork(); > Any chanc

Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] use -prefer-non-pic on x86-{freebsd,linux}

2004-12-20 Thread Steph
It came, it went. So are we onto the 'unknown number of months' already? - Steph (writing up overdue weeklies for Zend) - Original Message - From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "

[PHP-DEV] Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time)

2005-01-06 Thread Steph
ge.xml files we have all over now (since hartmut went > through and fleshed them out). Likewise, the CREDITS files could be > generated that way too. Yes, that'd work nicely for PHP 5. Not PHP 4 tho'... Guess this needs to be a list discussion really, cc'ing to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time)

2005-01-06 Thread Steph
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:49:24 +0200, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > One of the things I'd like to see is an auto-generated EXTENSIONS file > > > > > based on the package.xml files we have all over now (since hartmut > > went >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: more whoiswho fallback (not peclweb this time)

2005-01-06 Thread Steph
ter the affected entries manually for now, but there needs to be some tag in the package.xml files to indicate PECLization. > > --Wez. - Steph -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] EXTENSIONS files

2005-01-06 Thread Steph
to do it there. Diffs attached as textfiles, hopefully this will allow them through. Both are against their respective HEAD. - Steph --- orig_EXTENSIONS Thu Jan 06 13:16:02 2005 +++ EXTENSIONS Thu Jan 06 18:54:36 2005 @@ -27,25 +27,32 @@ == Server

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >