erm - when was the decision to no longer maintain the .dsp files made?
Did I go to sleep?
- Original Message -
From: "Uwe Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff Beidler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Cc: "Jeff Beidler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PH
I seem to recall this discussion from days of yore. And the word was,
'nope, don't let the things wallow in historical mire, for many do use
them'.
I'll add it to the TODO (which is starting to look almost possible again).
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Steph wrote:
>
> >
Animated .gif support? :)
- Original Message -
From: "Pierre-Alain Joye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Zülke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:57:40 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Zülke) wrote:
> How abo
Ah, but is it the thread it was?
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrei Zmievski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 (closed)
> On Wed,
against what
is now pecl/printer, and dated 1993.
So yep - I'd say go for it, too.
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PHPdev"
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 3:3
erm, for 1993 please read 2003 :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PHPdev"
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:57 PM
Subject: R
ther than a political decision, and it
makes me very uneasy.
Please - any dev - feel free to explain how I'm seeing it all wrong,
preferably in words of one syllable. (Derick: polite ones? ;)
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I couldn't agree more, Wez - but this is the problem I'm seeing. What
chance is there of working it out together when all discussion on the topic
has been effectively overruled? If this ever gets to be the standard
approach to PHP development, we'll have utter chaos.
The last word on the subject
ee 5.1.0 stable and 'out there'
before opening this can of worms.
> We can
> refrain from uncommenting that code until we reach an agreement.
It shouldn't even be there until there is agreement...
- Steph
>
> Andi
>
>
> At 03:09 PM 7/21/2005 +0100, Steph wrote:
I missed one...Index: sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.266
diff -u -r1.266 cgi_main.c
--- sapi/cgi/cgi_main.c 16 Jun 2005 14:54:51 - 1.266
+++ sapi/cgi/cgi_main.
but IMO it's less elegant. What do others think?
>
If it counts for anything, I'm with Zeev over this one. I think version
compatibility's likely to become an issue in unexpected ways, and also the
meaning of E_USER_ERROR is less intuitive because it wouldn't behave in a
s
Hi Rasmus,
> Steph wrote:
> > If there's the capability to run PHP 6 without Unicode support, surely
> > there's no reason for extensions to lose back compatability when they're
> > updated...?
>
> That's going to be tough. They will definitely l
ing
> intelligent when passed an IS_UNICODE string. IS_UNICODE strings don't
> just exist when unicode semantics are turned on either. So it actually
> doesn't matter if that switch is on or not, extensions should handle
> Unicode strings.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
-
on't_ use zend_parse_parameters()? I mean, it's been around for a long
time now...
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Rob, hi,
You never committed this (or anything else in ext/libxml since then as far
as I can see) - do you still intend to?
- Steph-working-on-backlog-and-will-shoot-the-next-person-to-ask
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday,
Yep. I saw this happening during the PHP 5 coding contest we held last year
at Zend - some people used short open tags so I had to have that 'on' in my
php.ini to test, but having it 'on' screwed the entries that used XML, so I
was forever switching short open tags off and on.
I was supposed to p
'Replace'? Code written for ext/xmlrpc won't work with ext/xmlrpci. Will
ext/xmlrpc be available in PECL, given that it doesn't appear to have an
active maintainer?
I'm well aware of ext/xmlrpc's limitations, haven't tried the new (but
necessary) pecl/xmlrpci yet, and have the tiny issue that a
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 16:23 +0200, Steph wrote:
> > 'Replace'? Code written for ext/xmlrpc won't work with ext/xmlrpci.
Will
> > ext/xmlrpc be available in PECL, given that it doesn't appear to have an
> > active maintainer?
>
> Sure it'll
> > That's fair enough, so long as the older version is readily available.
It
> > becomes a problem if it isn't. The word 'replace' kind of intimates
that
> > the original extension is effectively a goner - and if you meant
'replace in
> > the core', I'm unaware of a precedent for that.
>
> Yes.
> Let's please stop breaking things just because we find them
> aesthetically displeasing.
*hug*
> -adam
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Leigh, that's kinda the point (and to some degree the problem).
This is not a job.
> If you don't know why it's wrong to tell them they are stupid, and can't
> be bother spending an extra 10 seconds formulating a respectable
> response instead, then you are the wrong person for the job.
>
-
Nicely said, Adam.
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Leigh Makewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bogusing bot (Was: [PHP-DEV] Reference
handlingchange and PHP 4.4.0)
> On Th
oops, wrong button...
- Original Message -
From: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Issues with PHP 5 on Windows 98
> Hi Andreas,
>
> We haven
This is probably a stupid question, but why isn't there a default setting?
And why can't the missing default setting be set by the system date() data?
- Original Message -
From: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lukas Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September
So you're saying this issue's going to be history by the time 5.1 is due for
release?
- Original Message -
From: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wouldn't call it broken, just less inituitive. But besides that point,
> I looked at some data and have a patch that allows the timezone guessing
> code to also check against the GMT offset, and not only the
> abbreviation. This means that with these DB entries:
>
> { "idt", 1, -HOUR (
hmm but if Derick's picking up the name of the tz the way he suggested and
printing it as part of an E_STRICT we'll soon get clear reports of any
exceptions to the rule.
- Original Message -
From: "Stanislav Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PHP D
?
My own feeling is that RCs shouldn't be announced in this way, but I know
you all want a broad test base for them.
Perhaps we could make them available via a separate download page with a
header and text making it fully clear these are not PHP releases?
- Steph
- Original Message -
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "internals"
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions?
>
> This has NOT been the policy. The person who came up with
> thi
7;re one of the
good guys, I know you work like stink on the project and I know half of what
you say is tongue-in-cheek - but who else knows it?
Beside all that stuff, Jani, it's a Jewish religious holiday. You're
attacking people who aren't around to defend themselves. How
ey
> skipped out.
Actually, this October the holidays pretty much _are_ 3 weeks long... and
FWIW I don't think you see one half of the work 'they' do until it's done.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
7;ve already started working on some but holidays... I'd
> appreciate help).
I agree, and I'd be more than happy to work on that. Can you commit what
you have?
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
visible difference to
PHP-GTK's draw speed. And please note, even the 'NTS' option has
proved confusing for
some...!
- Steph
On Nov 13, 2007 5:34 AM, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Elizabeth,
>
> No doubt there's value in providing a non-threadsafe buil
type hinting for scalars without a mandate, and there doesn't appear to be
one right now. If it _is_ accepted it'll most likely be in PHP 6 not 5.3
anyway, because 5.3's features were agreed (and limited) a couple of months
ago.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
7;ve heard from 3 internals developers (I missed Pierre's mail earlier) in
a thread that has gathered over 60 emails in - in my timezone - a single
evening. Most of the dev team won't have time to read such a long thread...
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailin
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
2009/1/28 Steph Fox :
sfoxWed Jan 28 17:23:28 2009 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-srcUPGRADING
Log:
- Skeleton version taken directly from the scratchpad and tidied.
@Lukas, Johannes: This is nowhere near complete, and may
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
And now to the list too *sigh*, sorry Steph :)
I did wonder :)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 13:49, Steph wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
2009/1/28 Steph Fox :
sfoxWed Jan 28 17:23:28 2009 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-src
Hi Lukas, all,
Well the last thread on the topic ("5.3 todos") stopped with Steph
explaining that there are 2 different documents, one the UPGRADING guide
in php-src and one being the manual and that she intends to focus the
UPGRADING guide to be short and to the point for sysadmi
Felipe Pena wrote:
Hello,
just to inform, I've commited (yesterday) the patch removing the
UG(unicode) checks, etc across all source (except mysql exts). As the
patch has 492K, looks as no mail will be sent.
I'd given up hope of ever seeing that reach CVS :)
Thanks Felipe!
- Step
> Changing PHP's behavior with a different error level is only a tad bit
> better than adding an INI directive. In general I'd like the core
language
> to behave the same no matter what error level or INI settings.
> I say nuke type-hints and let the purists use instanceof.
>
> Andi
>
Speaking as
FWIW the version I'm trying to force Edin to use for win32 builds is a
messed-around-with 1.28
(ie that's fine here in the win32 corner ;)
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Börger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] bison p
> > ATM, in_array() takes 2 args and 1 parameter. Adding 1 more
> > wouldn't hurt, doesn't break BC, and provides some added
> > usefulness.
>
> And slows down the inner loop of searching.
>
> > IMHO, this would be a handy feature, and if it
> > were added I can't imagine having to extend in_arr
> Andrei: -1
> Ilia: -1
> Derick: -1
> Georg: -1
> Marcus: +0
> Moriyoshi: -1
>
> Total: -5
>
> So I marked it: Won't Fix
>
> Good experience thou =)
>
>
> /Magnus
Hrm, and next time I'll leave it til I've read to the end of the thread
before I comment :-I
--
PHP Intern
I personally find array extremely clear, in recent weeks I had to do A LOT
of JavaScript work where the array syntax works in a manner you suggest
for PHP and its a massive pain. It does not make for a very clear code. I
think the syntax you propose is extremely confusing and we should stick
ax you propose is extremely confusing and
we should stick to what we have right now.
If someone does not like this new syntax, he can stick to array(). It
is in no way an argument to refuse the new syntax addition.
And what about maintenance? And what about the confusion for beginners?
-
cript there is only one option. That's the difference.
- Steph
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
Fine, but in javascript there is only one option. That's the difference.
- Steph
a = Array(1,2,3)
a = [1,2,3]
I stand corrected. Apologies for the noise.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Good point. So if the decision is indeed to deprecate ereg, its time to
mark it deprecated. And while we are at it .. lets introduce
E_DEPRECATED as well :)
Please do (Someone. I do realize Lukas can't.)
- Steph
regards,
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
ource documentation on php.net. Please. It needs serious attention.
If you just want glorification, forget it - one with far stronger
credentials has gone before.
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Gwynne Raskind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:45
- and that will teach me to read to the end of the thread before I respond.
What Tony said :)
- Original Message -
From: "Antony Dovgal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gwynne Raskind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Documenting the Zen
nd either stick it
online somewhere or mail it here? I can check which patches still haven't
been merged and pass on those needing attention to folk with the appropriate
karma. (i.e. 'not PDO' ;)
I think everyone's just going to have to accept it isn't goi
You ask and you shall receive :-)
Thanks. I guess :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
imho a very bad thing to have three databases for bugs.
Amen.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
worked fine yesterday.. (win98)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
'The old build system' happens to be standard.. php-gtk for one relies at
present on a standard PHP build rather than the new one. I doubt it's
alone.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 June 2004 17:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROT
>
> And anybody who suggests removing Interbase will have a large section of
> active Firebird users on their heads.
> If you want to get rid of anything make it MySQL :)
> We WILL produce a clean Firebird module to replace the current Interbase
> one, but are waiting for PHP5 to be released before
P-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/mysqli mysqli_api.c
>
>
> Steph wrote:
> > win32 build's failing now only on one export:
>
> Fails on 10 for me:
>
> mysqli.obj: error LNK2001: Unresolved external symbol _client_errors
> mysqli_repl.obj: error LNK2019: Unresolved ext
Anyone want to play?
- Steph
DevZone Editor
www.zend.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
FYI: Both the mssql and mysqli extensions missing from RC3 are now available
on snaps.php.net.
> -Original Message-
> From: Antony Dovgal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 June 2004 10:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Fwd: php5 rc3 win32 mysqli-extension is missing]
, all seems well with direct inheritance
(only) */
}
new blah('blah - first param', 'blah - second param');
new sonOfBlah('sonOfBlah - first and only param');
$db = new DB();
$db2 = new secondDB('localhost', 'root', '');
print($db2->t
shouldn't there be an error message in that case?
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2004 13:15
> To: Stanislav Malyshev
> Cc: PHP Development
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] simplexml build broken
>
>
> Hello Stanislav,
>
> libxml is configured
> The next question is - are both PHP4 and PHP5 going to be run in
> parallel, like Apache 1 and 2 so that neither gets finished ;)
Darn.. y'mean PHP 4 isn't finished? ;)
>
> --
> Lester Caine
> -
> L.S.Caine Electronic Services
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runti
FYI (it'll save you looking):
There are two branches in SQLite's CVS.. I believe that Derrell is
referring to more recent releases of the stable 2.8.* branch rather than the
alpha 3.* branch. The sqlite library currently bundled with PHP 5 is 3
version points behind the times and dates from last
short test script
for the ATTACH command please?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2004 14:04
> To: Marcus Boerger
> Cc: Steph; Ilia Alshanetsky; Andi Gutmans; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP5 RC3
&
Hey Ilia, if I don't understand why you aren't helping, Derrell sure as heck
won't! Has he updated the actual 2.8.14 library as opposed to the bundled
lib, is that the problem?
Aha! Wez just went by, saying 'SQLite update? It's mostly done, it can go
in when I have inet access'.
Better lend him
Those methods work fine. The code's incorrect in your example; you were
echoing the original string.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 July 2004 10:48
> To: PHPdev
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] tidylib behaviour changed
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Finally today
Ahh I had that yesterday, but only when a particular extension was built-in.
So I blamed the extension.. What's your configure line?
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sebastian Bergmann
> Sent: 13 July 2004 12:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [
Guy, all,
I hope nobody minds if I forward this to the phpdoc list where this will be
fully appreciated ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Guy N. Hurst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2004 03:46
> To: PHPdev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] congrats and thanks
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to add
n
external iconv.dll at runtime..
- Steph
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 July 2004 23:32
> To: Rob Richards
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32
>
>
> I've been using th
e reason the iconv
> > exports were put there in the first place was so that the libxml build
> could
> > rely with confidence on there being built-in support for libxml's own
> > built-in iconv functions through PHP, rather than having to lean on an
> > external icon
Stefan Esser already committed it to all branches..
> -Original Message-
> From: Romain Bourdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 July 2004 13:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] WAHT about gd 2.0.28 and Gif support?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> i saw that 07/21/04, gd 2.0.28 has been rele
> My opinion would be that goto isn't needed with the do..while()
> statement..
> But on the other hand.. Neither for(), while() or do..while() would be
> needed with goto, would they?
I learned a language called PHP. It contains for(), while() and
do..while(). I've been writing scripts that con
> My point still remains.. Goto is powerful, even if not needed.. There's
> about one time I would use goto, which could easily be done with two
> do..while().. The funny thing is, that I didn't do it that way, cause I
> though it looked ugly.
And my point still remains. There are an awful lot of
> My point was to say it's powerful, as powerful as all those, not that it
> could replace them.. I would still use while(), do..while() and for() the
> times they are intended for.. I'm sure most of the people would..
> There are
> however situations where goto is what makes sense..
I'm still wai
Jochem: +1 :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 August 2004 01:22
> To: Sara Golemon
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GOTO operator
>
>
> I'm +1 on goto with static labels.
>
> regardless of whether it ends up in PHP or not I thin
h versions of libgd are
being used by other projects?
There was a positive response to Joe's patch initially (off-list). Is
anyone planning to adapt it for 5_0 branch before the 5.0.1 release, is it
going to wait until 5.1, or is it now abandoned for some reason?
Just wondering..
- S
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, nsangineto wrote:
> > Where can I apply for a PHP and also Java contract?
>
> What's a PHP contract?
Sssh! They'll all want one!
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
;
>
> >>it is a public interface! Unfortunatley we still have no way of
> documenting
> >>classes on the docs page.
> >
> > Thanks. Steph forwarded me this link, which could be provided
> on the docs
> > page as additional reference, until there's
I will do. Did anyone remember that php-gtk-doc needs to align to this when
they were designing it?
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2004 19:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; internals; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
> >I would think that sticking with the current ini files would
> probably lead
> >to less confusion.
>
> I second that...
Just a quick note here - if this code gets taken on board,
ext/standard/config.w32 and win32/php5dllts.dsp will need to be updated with
the relevant sr
There's a (closed, not enough info) bug report on this:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29227
(just to confirm that there's an issue there at all)
> -Original Message-
> From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 August 2004 09:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-D
Not clearer to me :)
If this was a big reason for reverting __toString() for 5.0.0, does it mean
we're going to see it again soon as a result of this change?
> -Original Message-
> From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 August 2004 00:53
> To: Sterling Hughes
> Cc: Andi G
Hi list,
HEAD is broken for me following Derick's new sort flag addition earlier
today.
The attached one-liner may be a wrong fix, neither self nor D are sure.
However it _does_ allow HEAD to build on my system!
- Steph
--- zend_config.w32.h Mon Sep 13 15:17:16 2004
+++ new_zend_config.
dodgy fix
>
>
> If that fixes it, doesn't that imply that other systems without
> strcoll will also fail to build now?
> (are there any that we care about?)
>
> --Wez.
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:21:14 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi list,
>
need a real fix :-)
>
> --Wez.
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:11:10 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, there's only win32 and netware that have config files in
> the Zend dir.
> >
> > I put it in the wrong place, it needs to be just ahead of the
ally undefined
> HAVE_STRCOLL (to simulate not having it), will the build break?
>
> If so, then we need a real fix :-)
>
> --Wez.
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:11:10 +0100, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, there's only win32 and netware that have config f
BTW shouldn't main/config.w32.h be in .cvsignore?
- Steph
Index: Zend/zend_config.w32.h
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_config.w32.h,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -r1.36 zend_config.w32.h
--- Zend/zend_config.
No it doesn't, because there are other items in PHP that rely on
HAVE_STRCOLL and need it to be defined where it currently is. So it needs
to be redefined in zend_config.w32.h for Zend files, where this is its only
occurrence.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:[EMAIL P
We had this discussion on irc already.
The Zend files change is necessary for Windows.
The other change I submitted prevents the problem of not being able to build
PHP on systems where STRCOLL is not available.
Submit!
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Moved #if a few paces to the left on Wez's advice. Fussy old compilers ;)
Still does the same job (fixes win32 build and all builds where there is no
strcoll), only this time without breaking otherwise happy builds.
- Steph
Index: Zend/zend_config.
Sent: 14 September 2004 17:21
> To: Steph
> Cc: internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] round 3
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Steph wrote:
>
> > Moved #if a few paces to the left on Wez's advice. Fussy old
> compilers ;)
> >
> > Still does the same job
That's because nobody applied the fix after D's patch yet.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kingma - Jool.nl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 September 2004 12:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Snaps.php.net
>
>
> Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but the win3
Hi Rubem,
Please could you re-post your mail to either [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] This discussion does not belong on the core
PHP internals list.
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Rubem Pechansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Georg, I have to back Wez up over this. I was 'around' for the LT
discussions both last year and this year, and I know exactly when PDO
reached PECL CVS.
What happened here?
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Georg
It's not easy to support something that doesn't exist...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "overight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php_fork();
> Any chanc
It came, it went. So are we onto the 'unknown number of months' already?
- Steph (writing up overdue weeklies for Zend)
- Original Message -
From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "
ge.xml files we have all over now (since hartmut went
> through and fleshed them out). Likewise, the CREDITS files could be
> generated that way too.
Yes, that'd work nicely for PHP 5. Not PHP 4 tho'...
Guess this needs to be a list discussion really, cc'ing to [EMAIL PROTE
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:49:24 +0200, Steph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > One of the things I'd like to see is an auto-generated EXTENSIONS
file
> > > > > based on the package.xml files we have all over now (since hartmut
> > went
>
ter the
affected entries manually for now, but there needs to be some tag in the
package.xml files to indicate PECLization.
>
> --Wez.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
to do it there.
Diffs attached as textfiles, hopefully this will allow them through.
Both are against their respective HEAD.
- Steph
--- orig_EXTENSIONS Thu Jan 06 13:16:02 2005
+++ EXTENSIONS Thu Jan 06 18:54:36 2005
@@ -27,25 +27,32 @@
== Server
1 - 100 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
