I thought it was only me and Zeev that didn't like it :) So can we make a policy over this and write it in stone somewhere?
Or do we have to write it in water? ps your new 'limited period' sig is rather wonderful... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "internals" <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:45 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PHP-GTK-DEV] PHP-GTK2 mysql Extensions? > > This has NOT been the policy. The person who came up with > this stupid idea should be punis..informed about it. > > There's this nice download-server running thttpd (IIRC) > somewhere where the RCs and such USED to be put. > > (dejavu or did I actually mention about this earlier? :) > > --Jani > > -- > Give me your money at @ <http://pecl.php.net/wishlist.php/sniper> > Donating money may make me happier and friendlier for a limited period! > Death to all 4 letter abbreviations starting with P! > > > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Steph wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > You don't need to read the whole of the history below, but doing so might > > help to illustrate some of the confusion caused by distributing PHP release > > candidates and extension packs on the php.net downloads page alongside the > > official PHP releases. > > > > Can we re-think this policy, please? > > > > My own feeling is that RCs shouldn't be announced in this way, but I know > > you all want a broad test base for them. > > > > Perhaps we could make them available via a separate download page with a > > header and text making it fully clear these are not PHP releases? > > > > - Steph > > > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
