On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Trevor Suarez wrote:
>> Ah, I didn't realize this thread existed. I had just commented on the old
>> one, but the point still stands:
>>
>> PHP 7.0 RC1 was just tagged.
>> Shouldn't this be a relatively
Hi,
The first release candidate for 7.0.0 was just released and can be
downloaded from:
https://downloads.php.net/~ab/
The Windows binaries are available at
http://windows.php.net/qa/
This release contains fixes for 27 reported bugs, and altogether over 200
commits with various stabili
Hi,
Resending this as missed internals at the start.
I was lately rethinking some part of the 64-bit RFC, and also seeing now
Jakub's work on catching overflows in ext/openssl and Matt Williams
suggestions on it (which was going a bit more global over it). So I came up
with these macros with two
Maybe I'm missing something here, but how do these macros detect overflow
exactly? If the check is done on the actual result and not the operands
then it's not a good overflow check. Additionally, why wouldn't overflow
checks be needed on 32-bit architecture, or any other architecture for that
matt
Hi Sherif,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sherif Ramadan [mailto:theanomaly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:21 AM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Dmitry Stogov ; Xinchen Hui ;
> Nikita Popov ; Pierre Joye ;
> Bob Weinand ; Jakub Zelenka ; Matt
> Wilmas ; PHP Internals
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol@belski.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:38 AM
> To: 'Sherif Ramadan'
> Cc: 'Dmitry Stogov' ; 'Xinchen Hui' ;
> 'Nikita Popov' ; 'Pierre Joye' ;
> 'Bob Weinand' ; 'Jakub Zelenka' ;
> 'Matt Wilmas' ; 'PHP Internals'
>
>
I think you're a little optimistic about how effective these macros would
be for overflow checks. Also, if we're talking ANSI C or C99, then size_t
is always unsigned, and as far as I know GCC 2.4 always treats it as such.
If we're trying to stick to C here anyway.
As far as architecture specific
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Scott Arciszewski
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Trevor Suarez wrote:
>>> Ah, I didn't realize this thread existed. I had just commented on the old
>>> one, but the point still stands:
>>>
>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sherif Ramadan [mailto:theanomaly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 12:00 PM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Dmitry Stogov ; Xinchen Hui ;
> Nikita Popov ; Pierre Joye ;
> Bob Weinand ; Jakub Zelenka ; Matt
> Wilmas ; PHP Internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-
Hi Bob!
On 21.08.2015 at 00:13, Bob Weinand wrote:
> Commit:82b73fd1e3c53228bb31b75a446114b5fd0cd240
> Author:Bob Weinand Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:25:49
> +0100
> Parents: a3eed5fbfe24368726906f425b15ce40b5fc36e0
> Branches: master
>
> Link:
> http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: a...@adamharvey.name [mailto:a...@adamharvey.name] On Behalf
> > Of Adam Harvey
> > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 8:44 PM
> > To: Christoph Becker
> > Cc: Anatol Belski ; PHP internals
> >
> > S
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Scott Arciszewski
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Trevor Suarez wrote:
Ah, I didn't realize this thread existed. I had just c
Hi!
How should development and maintenance of the zip extension be handled?
Which is the "master" repo?
It seems that ext/zip and pecl/zip already have diverged, and IMHO it
would be reasonable to keep both repos in sync (or maybe to drop pecl/zip).
--
Christoph M. Becker
--
PHP Internals -
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-08-21 05:00:00+03:00
commit: 823062d6c1df3dfdb370c98164e0b793034e0d23
revision_date:2015-08-21 00:13:03+02:00
environment: Haswell-EP
cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2,
LLC 45 MB
Hi all,
Am 21.08.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Christoph Becker:
> Hi Bob!
>
> On 21.08.2015 at 00:13, Bob Weinand wrote:
>
>> Commit:82b73fd1e3c53228bb31b75a446114b5fd0cd240
>> Author:Bob Weinand Sun, 2 Nov 2014
>> 23:25:49 +0100
>> Parents: a3eed5fbfe24368726906f425b15ce40b5fc36e0
> Am 21.08.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Dennis Birkholz :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Am 21.08.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Christoph Becker:
>> Hi Bob!
>>
>> On 21.08.2015 at 00:13, Bob Weinand wrote:
>>
>>> Commit:82b73fd1e3c53228bb31b75a446114b5fd0cd240
>>> Author:Bob Weinand Sun, 2 Nov 2014
>>> 23:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Bob Weinand wrote:
> > Am 21.08.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Dennis Birkholz :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am 21.08.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Christoph Becker:
> >> Hi Bob!
> >>
> >> On 21.08.2015 at 00:13, Bob Weinand wrote:
> >>
> >>> Commit:82b73fd1e3c53228bb31b75a446114b
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:14 PM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Adam Harvey ; Christoph Becker
> ; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Anatol B
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>
> MHO is this is too important of a distinction to simply gloss over.
> Having it return false (or null) will be a problem, as nobody will
> perform the error checks. And returning $x where `$x == 0` in a
> security context could be in
On 21.08.2015 at 22:37, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:14 PM
>> To: Anatol Belski
>> Cc: Adam Harvey ; Christoph Becker
>> ; PHP internals
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirem
Hi Dmitry, all,
Things are looking really good now, f-i-n-a-l-l-y! Last weekend, after
thinking "no more changes" again, I thought of a couple more improvements,
hah, and now I think there isn't much that could be improved.
So it should be fully alive this weekend, flying, with the fastest/s
On 08/21/2015 06:36 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> My proposal/stance:
>
> Let's make random_* throw an Exception if it cannot connect to a
> random source. And let's have it throw an TypeError if ZPP fails, or
> Error if min >= max.
>
> The first two are consistent with existing exceptions.
I don
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:37 PM
> To: Scott Arciszewski
> Cc: Pierre Joye ; Trevor Suarez ;
> Niklas Keller ; PHP Internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Recap - Core functions throwing exceptions in PHP7
>
On 21.08.2015 at 12:14, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
> 2. One of the folks in the camp that WANTS an RFC and a drawn out
> formal decision-making process opens it with a poll.
AIUI, that is not how it is supposed to work. Those who want to change
existing behavior should make a respective RFC, if co
On Aug 22, 2015 7:39 AM, "Christoph Becker" wrote:
>
> On 21.08.2015 at 12:14, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
>
> > 2. One of the folks in the camp that WANTS an RFC and a drawn out
> > formal decision-making process opens it with a poll.
>
> AIUI, that is not how it is supposed to work. Those who want
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sherif Ramadan [mailto:theanomaly...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 12:00 PM
> > To: Anatol Belski
> > Cc: Dmitry Stogov ; Xinchen Hui ;
> > Nikita Popov ; Pierre Joye ;
> > Bob Weina
Anatol,
On Aug 21, 2015 8:10 PM, "Anatol Belski" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:37 PM
> > To: Scott Arciszewski
> > Cc: Pierre Joye ; Trevor Suarez ;
> > Niklas Keller ; PHP Internals
> >
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Anatol,
>
> On Aug 21, 2015 8:10 PM, "Anatol Belski" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:37 PM
>> > To: Scott Arciszewski
>> > Cc
Pierre
On Aug 21, 2015 22:01, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Anthony Ferrara
wrote:
> > Anatol,
> >
> > On Aug 21, 2015 8:10 PM, "Anatol Belski" wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
> >>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>
> Pierre
>
> On Aug 21, 2015 22:01, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Anthony Ferrara
> > wrote:
> > > Anatol,
> > >
> > > On Aug 21, 2015 8:10 PM, "Anatol Belski" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> > --
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> If that's what it will take I will happily draft one tomorrow morning. But
> if the RMs are against it, I will respect that as well. Hence the dilemma.
For what I understand the RMs are not against what it is proposed but
its incompletene
Pierre
On Aug 21, 2015 22:33, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Anthony Ferrara
wrote:
>
> > If that's what it will take I will happily draft one tomorrow morning.
But
> > if the RMs are against it, I will respect that as well. Hence the
dilemma.
>
> For what I understand
On Aug 22, 2015 9:33 AM, "Pierre Joye" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Anthony Ferrara
wrote:
>
> > If that's what it will take I will happily draft one tomorrow morning.
But
> > if the RMs are against it, I will respect that as well. Hence the
dilemma.
>
> For what I understand the R
33 matches
Mail list logo
