On Aug 22, 2015 9:33 AM, "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If that's what it will take I will happily draft one tomorrow morning. But > > if the RMs are against it, I will respect that as well. Hence the dilemma. > > For what I understand the RMs are not against what it is proposed but > its incompleteness and the fact that it affects the timeline for php > 7. > > The sooner will benefit from a RFC, making this whole discussion a lot > clearer. The latter is a requirement to change, even slightly, > anything about what we decided for php 7. The RMs role is to ensure we > respect what we decided by RFC, hence the oppositions.
By the way, I would really like to see other voicing their opinion on the matter, especially those having pushed hard in favour of this timeline.
