Hi Steph,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
>
> > and about Attic, the idea behind a graveyard was about leaving the
> > code around for study purposes.
>
> Code in the attic can be read online but can't be checked out, so I take
> your point a
Hi Pierre,
and about Attic, the idea behind a graveyard was about leaving the
code around for study purposes.
Code in the attic can be read online but can't be checked out, so I take
your point about 'study purposes'. I'd use siberia for things like axis2,
where the project is live and hoste
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Siberia was meant for dead module with no potential to come back to
> > live.
>
> Not in my eyes. There's only a problem with CVS Attic if you want to bring
> something back to life, so if there's no potential for that - wh
Siberia was meant for dead module with no potential to come back to
live.
Not in my eyes. There's only a problem with CVS Attic if you want to bring
something back to life, so if there's no potential for that - why not use
it?
I can't see how these two can live again as they are under GPL,
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 01.04.2008 17:00, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >>> So - plain old CVS attic or 'siberia' for the GPL'd ones?
> >>
> >> IMO Attic.
> >
> > Yep, attic should be fine.
>
> I agree with you both (consider it done).
> We'll ne
On 01.04.2008 17:00, Marcus Boerger wrote:
So - plain old CVS attic or 'siberia' for the GPL'd ones?
IMO Attic.
Yep, attic should be fine.
I agree with you both (consider it done).
We'll need siberia for modules that have the potential to live again - these
two aren't in that category.
-
On 01.04.2008 17:00, Marcus Boerger wrote:
So - plain old CVS attic or 'siberia' for the GPL'd ones?
IMO Attic.
Yep, attic should be fine.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
