Siberia was meant for dead module with no potential to come back to live.
Not in my eyes. There's only a problem with CVS Attic if you want to bring something back to life, so if there's no potential for that - why not use it?
I can't see how these two can live again as they are under GPL, unless the original authors agree to relicense them.
Not happening. a) both extensions wrap/interface GPL'd libraries and b) the muscat library no longer exists.
The unmaintained packages (which can be maintained again, aka back to live) has be marked as such.
Yes, we need to mark them ORPHANED. But that's a whole different story, because we need to have some criteria about when a module becomes orphaned - and we don't have that in place yet.
That reminds me that I have to update the RFC according to our discussions :P
I'd call the 'PECL versioning' one a done deal at this stage, pretty much - it just needs a write-up on pecl.php.net for newcomers to refer to, and a request for the final handful of extensions to comply.
We probably need a whole new RFC for core module versioning. Want to kick it off?
- Steph
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
