On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 01.04.2008 17:00, Marcus Boerger wrote: > >>> So - plain old CVS attic or 'siberia' for the GPL'd ones? > >> > >> IMO Attic. > > > > Yep, attic should be fine. > > I agree with you both (consider it done). > We'll need siberia for modules that have the potential to live again - these > two aren't in that category.
Siberia was meant for dead module with no potential to come back to live. I can't see how these two can live again as they are under GPL, unless the original authors agree to relicense them. The unmaintained packages (which can be maintained again, aka back to live) has be marked as such. That reminds me that I have to update the RFC according to our discussions :P Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
