Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-11-07 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of Sun Oct 23 18:36:04 -0400 2011: > So, I've registered a blueprint for UDS here: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-php54 > > There's no guarantee we will be able to fit it in, so make sure to > subscribe to it if you are interest

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [php-maint] [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-25 Thread Lester Caine
Thomas Goirand wrote: There was quite some changes with some resulting issue when switching Squeeze from 5.2 to 5.3, for example having a deprecation notice warning about return of a reference, or the removal of some function. This*did* break things, especially when dealing with XML or other pars

[PHP-DEV] Re: [php-maint] [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/25/2011 06:18 AM, de...@lucato.it wrote: > Hi, > > I have always disliked the lack of modern packages on Debian/Ubuntu > distros, I feel like minor are misused as major versions, with an > exaggerated fear to upgrade. There was quite some changes with some resulting issue when switching Squ

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-24 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Clint, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > I appreciate the sentiments of all who have weighed in on this, and I > do want to make sure that we are paying attention to the greater PHP > community's needs, not just Ubuntu's users. Shipping really old PHP > versions is defini

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-23 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Hannes Magnusson's message of Sat Oct 22 04:03:50 -0700 2011: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS > > release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by > > Canonical for 5

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.10.2011 17:36, schrieb Lester Caine: > Johannes Schlüter wrote: There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for > > an LTS release. >>> > >>> > Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for >>> > the readers and totally

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Lester Caine
Johannes Schlüter wrote: There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for > > an LTS release. > > Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for > the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release > process RFC but every relea

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Gwynne Raskind
2011/10/22 Johannes Schlüter : >> > There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable >> > for >> > an LTS release. >> Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for >> the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release >> process RFC but

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:39 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote: > hi, > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > > > > There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for > > an LTS release. > > Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for >

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Pierre Joye
hi, On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > > There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for > an LTS release. Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release proces

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Lester Caine
Pierre Joye wrote: On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote: Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by Canonical for 5 years. B

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Pierre Joye
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS >> release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by >> Canonical for 5 years. Because of thi

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-22 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote: > Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS > release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by > Canonical for 5 years. Because of this, I really want to ship a version Wouldn't you rather want to

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-21 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 13:52 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > > The release date is April 26 2012, can anyone tell me if 5.3.9 is > expected > by then? Yes. 5.3.9 release cycle will start soon. Probably next week. So by April it is certainly there. I assume even 5.3.10 will be released by then. > Ide