Am 22.10.2011 17:36, schrieb Lester Caine: > Johannes Schlüter wrote: >>>> There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable >>>> for >>>> > > an LTS release. >>> > >>> > Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for >>> > the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release >>> > process RFC but every release has a fixed lifetime. >> This discussion is about Ubuntu LTS. So 5.4 might be a valid choice for >> them. > > Correct, but Ubuntu distribution includes a number of PHP powered > applications and extensions, and they would be > stable on PHP5.3 so putting PHP5.4 in instead would be a major mistake. Clint > needs to bare that in mind when > making any decision?
you missed that here is a disuccsion of a FUTURE VERSION of ubuntu tell us WAHT applications do not run with 5.4 until you can not please call it not a "major mistake" a major mistake is that distributiins hanging years behind current php versions and so php-developers of widely used applications can not use new features and upgrade their development and the result of this is "would be stable with an old version" so you are missing the root causes of problems if ubunto will release a new major version with 5.3 instead 5.4 ALL application developers must use 5.3 the next five years because this decision
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
