On 12/20/2006 12:26 PM, Andy Wharmby wrote:
Hi Internals
I am still pretty new to PHP but having spent the last couple of
months reviewing the PHP code and
getting to know how PHP ticks I would be happy to volunteer some time
take a look at some of the
outstanding issues with the COM extens
Wez Furlong wrote:
On 12/8/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as finding a maintainer is concerned, we can check again with
Wez. If
he doesn't have time we should probably be able to find someone who
can look
into some of those bugs. Despite bugs, I've never had issues with it.
Hello Ilia,
-1 (*), +1, +1, but I think you mean 5.3 as we have released 5.2 already
and I think it is a bad idea to drop in bugfix releases.
(*) If someone takes over i am fine with keeping it. I don't like stuff
nobody takes care of. If we cannot maintain it, it mostlikely has issues.
And tho
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
-1. Its core for windows, has little impact on non-windows users other
than a few extra KB to download, and works for the most part.
mhash:
sockets:
+1 for both
Rob
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net
On 12/8/06, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as finding a maintainer is concerned, we can check again with Wez. If
he doesn't have time we should probably be able to find someone who can look
into some of those bugs. Despite bugs, I've never had issues with it.
I'm currently (way!
On 12/8/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of bugs
(26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
But aside from those problems (which I suspect are mostly duplicates),
it works fine for the majority of users.
On Fri, December 8, 2006 10:03 am, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> COM:
> Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of bugs
> (26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
> Only usable to Win32 users, which I think we all admit are a
> minority and can always download read
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Well, it does not consume any resources simply because no one is
> maintaining it ;-). How really different things would be if it were in
> pecl? I mean afaik COM is not enabled by default on win32, so you still
> need to enable it manually. So, the only extra step for pe
> On 12/08/2006 07:03 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>
> > COM:
-1
COM should have more attention and I can try to find some of that.
> > mhash:
+1
> > sockets:
+1 when everything can be handled by streams
- Frank
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: h
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:17 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> On 8-Dec-06, at 1:01 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
> >> COM:
+1, easy to install from pecl.
> >> mhash:
> >> sockets:
> >> Un-maintained.
> A good point for 5.2, but given that there is no one to support users
> using t
At 21:51 08/12/2006, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am
thinking of
> moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases
> and was hoping to hear for & against arguments.
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am thinking of
> moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases
> and was hoping to hear for & against arguments.
> The reason for the making this move are as f
Hello,
On 12/8/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am
thinking of moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in
5.2 and 6.0 releases and was hoping to hear for & against arguments.
The reason for the making this
I'm OK with all except for COM.
I've actually used the COM extension quite a bit internally here for
reporting and creating Excel files (see one of my blog postings from about a
year ago). I think for those who are on Windows it's a really handy
extension. Last time I checked it was also always ena
Well, it does not consume any resources simply because no one is
maintaining it ;-). How really different things would be if it were in
I meant runtime resources, not developer resources. Like memory, CPU, etc :)
pecl? I mean afaik COM is not enabled by default on win32, so you still
need to
On 8-Dec-06, at 1:01 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of
bugs (26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
I don't think COM should be moved out. Right, it's windows only -
but if you are on windows, COM extension is most
COM:
Un-maintained at this time and has a fairly serious number of bugs
(26 by latest count, many of which are crashes)
I don't think COM should be moved out. Right, it's windows only - but if
you are on windows, COM extension is most useful (I used it a number of
times and it's really am
On 12/08/2006 07:03 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
COM:
mhash:
sockets:
+1 +1 +1
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> COM:
+1
> mhash:
+1
> sockets:
+1
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visi
19 matches
Mail list logo
