Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Well, it does not consume any resources simply because no one is > maintaining it ;-). How really different things would be if it were in > pecl? I mean afaik COM is not enabled by default on win32, so you still > need to enable it manually. So, the only extra step for people who want > to use it would be to download it from pecl4win. This updates extensions > more frequently then we do releases, so it'd actually give people the > ability to get a more stable version (assuming bug fixes are made) far > sooner then they'd be able to otherwise.
You know wrongly, COM is enabled and built in static as default. Removing it would be a very bad idea IMO, and I don't see why unix users should worry a few extra K in the source tarball. Edin -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php