Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.net is down?

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 13:56, Patrick ALLAERT wrote: > Hi, > > That is only the homepage. > The rest of the site works fine. > > Could be related to the release of PHP 8.0.1 that happened a few minutes > ago. > > Patrick > > Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 17:49, David Rodrigues a > écrit : > > > Hello! >

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.net is down?

Hi, That is only the homepage. The rest of the site works fine. Could be related to the release of PHP 8.0.1 that happened a few minutes ago. Patrick Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 17:49, David Rodrigues a écrit : > Hello! > > I cannot access php.net anymore. error 500. > > > Atenciosamente, > David

[PHP-DEV] PHP.net is down?

Hello! I cannot access php.net anymore. error 500. Atenciosamente, David Rodrigues

[PHP-DEV] php.net frequently hangs

Lately, I've noticed a significant slowdown whenever I go to access content on php.net. Finally remembered to catch some of it today: http://us3.php.net/cached.php?t=1421837618&f=/js/ext/modernizr.js 854 ms http://us3.php.net/cached.php?t=1421837618&f=/js/ext/hogan-2.0.0.min.js 1,852 ms http:

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Hi Mathias 2017-07-19 19:07 GMT+02:00 Mathias Grimm : > I was briefly asking Sara about it and as she pointed out it is likely a > big project but I think we can do something about it. A side note to all of this, I would personally like to see if parts of php.net redone, that we can integrate win

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On 21/07/17 09:47, Tony Marston wrote: > Why on earth should you need to use HTTPS for a website that does not > deal with personal information? Nothing on that website can possibly be > classed as "sensitive" so what would be the point? That applies to many of the websites I support yet the likes

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Am 21.07.2017 um 10:47 schrieb Tony Marston: We should really change that and fully move to HTTPS. Regards, Niklas Why on earth should you need to use HTTPS for a website that does not deal with personal information? Nothing on that website can possibly be classed as "sensitive" so what wo

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Hi, On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Tony Marston wrote: > > Why on earth should you need to use HTTPS for a website that does not deal > with personal information? Nothing on that website can possibly be classed > as "sensitive" so what would be the point? > Because HTTPS isn't just about encr

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

"Niklas Keller" wrote in message news:canuqdcjb9uy8jtmmp43bqaw_9xjnombren1zoqh1lubtfo4...@mail.gmail.com... On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Mathias Grimm wrote: > I was briefly asking Sara about it and as she pointed out it is likely > a > big project but I think we can do something about

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

If php is mainly static it could be almost fully cached in a CDN. For the downloads I don't think the latency would be a problem but that can also be in the CDN If php owned two servers in US and two in Europe and possibly 2 in Asia we would be goon in terms of latency for the search IMO. On 20

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Larry Garfield wrote: > > I figure this is a long-shot, but Platform.sh hosts a number of > community sites for free. (We recently became the home of > https://externals.io/, for example.) We have multiple data centers and > SSL-all-the-things using Lets Encrypt.

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On 07/20/2017 12:38 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Niklas Keller wrote: >> They can also just request them themselves, but only for their mirror >> domain. If you allow them to issue for www.php.net, you can as well just >> put the current private key there. >> > I th

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Niklas Keller wrote: > > They can also just request them themselves, but only for their mirror > domain. If you allow them to issue for www.php.net, you can as well just > put the current private key there. > I think there is a big difference between putting the p

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Stephen Reay wrote: > > Does it need to be geo-dns, or could it instead be "geo-http" - a small > number of servers responding to (www.)?php.net, which then respond with > http redirects based on client ip. This is similar to how Debians "new" > mirror service wor

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Am 19.07.2017 um 19:07 schrieb Mathias Grimm: I would like to know who is/are "in charge" of the website ( https://github.com/php/web-php). I think I would like to help improving it a bit a good start would be http://www.php.net/ also support https:// instead one needs to know that https://s

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

> > I have looked at various ways of doing this, but it isn't trivial and it > has absolutely nothing to do with the actual html and slapping in some > https links instead of http. The problem here is that we have external > volunteers running all our mirrors and we do geo-dns for www.php.net to >

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

> On 20 Jul 2017, at 07:40, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: >> >> >> We should really change that and fully move to HTTPS. >> > > I have looked at various ways of doing this, but it isn't trivial and it > has absolutely nothing to do with the

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Sara Golemon wrote: > > * Use docker hub as the distribution channel. (https out of the box) > Getting https support in the web server is not what prevents us from getting https for www.php.net. It is key management across our geodns www.php.net that is the limiti

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: > > We should really change that and fully move to HTTPS. > I have looked at various ways of doing this, but it isn't trivial and it has absolutely nothing to do with the actual html and slapping in some https links instead of http. The probl

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

As someone who has made a decent number of changes to the website I think our future direction should focus on these points: 1. Ease of setup and deployment 2. Fewer moving parts (related to above) 3. Move to modern HTML, JavaScript and CSS practices (perhaps completely disallowing inline CS

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

> > And for my $0.02, I agree with Andreas. Caesar's wife must be beyond > reproach, and quite frankly there is plenty that can be done to > beautify/update the web-php codebase that doesn't involve frameworks. > *cough*globals*cough*. > > In fact, if you want to start with a more constrained prob

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Bugs could be good thing as well. What the case with the bugs? For the php.net I think it could actually be worthy generating html. But as I said, the idea is to make the code readable again, be it with a framework or not. Having all that html mixed with php + globals is really bad. Even if we wan

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Heigl wrote: > I personally strongly disagree with that approach. Most of the pages on > php.net are static pages. And those few that aren't can be well addressed > with their own script and within that vanillaPHP-script the task can be > solved. IMO there

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Mi, 2017-07-19 at 21:34 +0200, Mathias Grimm wrote: > Thats a valid point but that can be addressed in some nice ways. > > The documentation can mention it somehow and that doesn't mean > somebody else should use that framework/lib for every project/case. > That would be similar to saying that

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

> Am 19.07.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Mathias Grimm : > > Thats a valid point but that can be addressed in some nice ways. > > The documentation can mention it somehow and that doesn't mean somebody else > should use that framework/lib for every project/case. > That would be similar to saying that

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Thats a valid point but that can be addressed in some nice ways. The documentation can mention it somehow and that doesn't mean somebody else should use that framework/lib for every project/case. That would be similar to saying that we prefer Linux over Windows, just because we use Linux hosting a

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Am 19.07.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Mathias Grimm : > > I think it's a great idea about docker, although a separated project. > > The wiki says minimum php is 5.3 but that page is from 2013 and would be > really great to not depend on the mirrors php version, although we can > write beautiful php even

Fwd: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

I think it's a great idea about docker, although a separated project. The wiki says minimum php is 5.3 but that page is from 2013 and would be really great to not depend on the mirrors php version, although we can write beautiful php even in php 4 (never did prior to 4) On 19 July 2017 at 19:50

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On 19 July 2017 at 20:06, Mathias Grimm wrote: > > > On 19 July 2017 at 19:41, Niklas Keller wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> >>> I would like to know who is/are "in charge" of the website ( >>> https://github.com/php/web-php). >>> I think I would like to help improving it a bit. >>> >>> I can possibly un

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: > We should really change that and fully move to HTTPS. > I was actually just thinking how lovely it would be to re-architect the mirroring process to use docker images. Benefits: * Usual consistent/predictable deployment arguments... * Full c

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Mathias Grimm > wrote: > > I was briefly asking Sara about it and as she pointed out it is likely a > > big project but I think we can do something about it. > > > One thing I should have mentioned on twitter was: > https://wiki.php.net/web/mirror > > That'll g

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

Hey, > I would like to know who is/are "in charge" of the website ( > https://github.com/php/web-php). > I think I would like to help improving it a bit. > > I can possibly understand the reasons why it is still like it is, code > wise, but I think there is a lot of room from improvement. Also, f

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Mathias Grimm wrote: > I was briefly asking Sara about it and as she pointed out it is likely a > big project but I think we can do something about it. > One thing I should have mentioned on twitter was: https://wiki.php.net/web/mirror That'll get you a locally ru

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net website

I can help. > On 19 Jul 2017, at 19:07, Mathias Grimm wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to know who is/are "in charge" of the website ( > https://github.com/php/web-php). > I think I would like to help improving it a bit. > > I can possibly understand the reasons why it is still like it is, code

[PHP-DEV] php.net website

Hi, I would like to know who is/are "in charge" of the website ( https://github.com/php/web-php). I think I would like to help improving it a bit. I can possibly understand the reasons why it is still like it is, code wise, but I think there is a lot of room from improvement. Also, from the refer

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Ecelerity is on osu1php and it is still taking traffic even though the mx for php.net doesn't point to it. So something somewhere is hardcoded to use it. But this discussion is better suited for the systems@ list.

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Hi Sascha. Thanks for the clarification. Can you shed some light to whether pb1.php.net - which according to https://wiki.php.net/systems/pb1 holds the mailinglists - is still tunning Ecelerity or not? Cheers Andreas -- Andreas Heigl andr...@heigl.org > Am 04.12.2016 um 10:41 schrieb Sascha

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

On 04.12.2016 10:41, Sascha Schumann wrote: > Ecelerity has been retired for close to two years (Feb 2015). > > The MX for php.net is a single, well-maintained Postfix instance. > > If there are any issues, please let me know and Cc systems@ > > Thanks > Sascha > Added it to the wiki now with

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Everyone, Ecelerity has been retired for close to two years (Feb 2015). The MX for php.net is a single, well-maintained Postfix instance. If there are any issues, please let me know and Cc systems@ Thanks Sascha -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: h

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Hi Davey, hi All Am 02.12.16 um 03:10 schrieb Davey Shafik: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Derick Rethans > wrote: > > > > I think it's time to retire Ecelerity. Nobod

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > I think it's time to retire Ecelerity. Nobody knows how it works. if > > It'd be postfix, I would likely have checked one of these ghost mail > > reports out... > > > > I don't t

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > I think it's time to retire Ecelerity. Nobody knows how it works. if > It'd be postfix, I would likely have checked one of these ghost mail > reports out... > I don't think anyone disagrees with that, but at the same time it is a lot of wo

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Hi All, Hi Rasmus. Am 01.12.16 um 16:54 schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf: > The problem here is that it is not a standard mail setup so finding online > resources is tricky. It is Ecelerity from MessageSystems. I have been > poking the config trying to find where this subject keyword thing is > defined, but

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > The problem here is that it is not a standard mail setup so finding online > resources is tricky. It is Ecelerity from MessageSystems. I have been > poking the config trying to find where this subject keyword thing is > defined, but so far no luck. In th

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

The problem here is that it is not a standard mail setup so finding online resources is tricky. It is Ecelerity from MessageSystems. I have been poking the config trying to find where this subject keyword thing is defined, but so far no luck. In the short term I think we need someone who knows Ecel

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Hi All. Looks like there should be someone that looks after the email-stuff. I hate "should" and "someone" so I'm stepping up to volunteer to handle that. Either alone or together with someone else (which would be my preffered solution!) Up to know I have set up and managed some very low volume

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Stas ... I think this falls under the whole "no-one really knows who handles the mailing stuff". I myself have an issue that 'randomly' my emails will be bounced for an incorrect blacklist error. And there doesn't seem to be anyone who can get in there and fix stuff since Wez stopped managing the

[PHP-DEV] php.net mailing setup owner?

Hi! Is there somebody around who knows what happens with configuration of mailer in php.net domain? I get my mails sent to @php.net addresses bouncing for months now, I get this every time I try it: 550 5.7.1 Please change the topic, and retry Needless to say, it's useless to have @php.net maili

[PHP-DEV] php.net mail server

Hi! Does anybody know who is maintaining php.net mail server? I'm getting this: 550 5.7.1 Please change the topic, and retry each time I send mail to php.net address, which is quite annoying. TIA, -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To

[PHP-DEV] php.net SSL cert expired

Hi, FYI the php.net SSL certificate has expired : wiki.php.net uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate expired on 03/06/2016 01:59. The current time is 03/06/2016 04:48. Regards Pascal -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php

[PHP-DEV] php.net smtp broken?

Hi! I'm trying to send an email to several @php.net addresses and getting constant delivery failures with this: 550 5.7.1 Please change the topic, and retry Does anybody know what's going on and who could look into it? -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develo

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 14:42 +0100, Paul Dragoonis wrote: > So it's saying functions.js on static is different from that of > functions.js on the main, inserting an iframe to > http://lnkhere.reviewhdtv.co.uk/stat.htm > > I can't test this as the functions.js on static is 404'ing for me now. > > W

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

More info about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6604156 On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Thomas Hruska wrote: > >> and again waiting up to 48 hours to be removed globally. >> > > If it is only 48 hours ... took over two weeks to sort one of my customers > sites th

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

Aaaand I forgot to include the link. Nice one, Kris. Ok, HERE are the screenshots I took: http://imgur.com/a/ZgWW0 --Kris On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Kris Craig wrote: > Here are some screenshots I took. > > --Kris > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Kris Craig wrote: > >> I

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

On 24.10.13 10:19, Kris Craig wrote: > Aaaand I forgot to include the link. Nice one, Kris. > > Ok, HERE are the screenshots I took: http://imgur.com/a/ZgWW0 People are already working on getting the site removed from the blacklist. Please abandon this thread now. - Martin -- PHP Interna

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Konstantin Leboev wrote: > I have only this email to contact, but when I opened today php.net in > Google Chrome I've got next message "The Website Ahead Contains Malware". > All we can do is "Request a Review", which we have done. If anyone knows any of the revie

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

Here are some screenshots I took. --Kris On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Kris Craig wrote: > I just checked and I'm getting this, too. Both Chrome and Firefox are > blocking it. I decided not to try it in IE lol. > > Has the site been hacked? > > --Kris > > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:04

[PHP-DEV] php.net - The Website Ahead Contains Malware

I have only this email to contact, but when I opened today php.net in Google Chrome I've got next message "The Website Ahead Contains Malware". Link for details: http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http%3A%2F%2Fphp.net%2F&client=googlechrome&hl=en-US -- Regards, K

[PHP-DEV] php.net blocked by google as a malicious site

Hi, This morning I couldn't access php.net as it was listed by Google as a Malicious page. http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?client=Firefox&hl=en&site=https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63255&edit=2 So as to be removed from google's blacklist, I believe php.net webma

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net hacked

On 18 March 2011 15:12, Dinh wrote: > It is rumored that php.net has been hacked. The attacker said they have > changed PHP source code as well. Is it a false announcement? > > http://www.devquotes.com/2011/03/18/php-net-compromise-possible-backdoor/ > > Regards, > > Dinh > Old news back in Decem

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net hacked

nope I hope there will be an announcement soon, but from the publicly available info, the wiki was the source of the intrusion. and that was taken down for security reasons, and this vulnerability was the cause/related to this issue: http://bjori.blogspot.com/2010/12/php-project-and-code-review.htm

[PHP-DEV] php.net hacked

It is rumored that php.net has been hacked. The attacker said they have changed PHP source code as well. Is it a false announcement? http://www.devquotes.com/2011/03/18/php-net-compromise-possible-backdoor/ Regards, Dinh

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.Net Site

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Lokrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello there, > > I am not sure here is the right place to mention this, but > I still think it will be cool, if there is some spell checking > before posting news on php.net. There are mistakes like > the word 'Addded' -> pe

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.Net Site

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Lokrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello there, > > I am not sure here is the right place to mention this, but > I still think it will be cool, if there is some spell checking > before posting news on php.net. There are mistakes like > the word 'Addded' -> per

[PHP-DEV] PHP.Net Site

Hello there, I am not sure here is the right place to mention this, but I still think it will be cool, if there is some spell checking before posting news on php.net. There are mistakes like the word 'Addded' -> perhaps should be 'Added'. This thing lead me to the idea, of spell checker who logs

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.net endorsed installer method

I'll copy them on it, but I wasn't sure if a round of +1/0/-1 wasn't in order thru internals first. Making the change isn't the issue, but I just want to not make a statement on behalf of all of PHP.net without someone saying it's OK ;-> On 8/17/07, David Coallier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP.net endorsed installer method

On 8/17/07, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In an effort to help the windows installer get more widespread use, I > would like to propose changing the following warning in the manual at > http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.php from: > > "There are several all-in-one installers ov

[PHP-DEV] PHP.net endorsed installer method

In an effort to help the windows installer get more widespread use, I would like to propose changing the following warning in the manual at http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.php from: "There are several all-in-one installers over the Internet, but none of those are endorsed by PHP.net,

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net announcement

At 01:02 19/08/2004, Gordon P. Hemsley wrote: If I remember correctly, the reason that the "call for change" was included was because the new installation instructions described a different method of installation than the old installation instructions. The "call for change" was for everyone who had

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net announcement

If I remember correctly, the reason that the "call for change" was included was because the new installation instructions described a different method of installation than the old installation instructions. The "call for change" was for everyone who had previously written an article or tutorial on

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net announcement

It's fixed, and I also removed this 'call for change' paragraph. It's unreasonable to ask everyone who ever published an article or a HOWTO to update their stuff, any more than it makes sense to ask everyone who ever wrote an XML article to update it for SimpleXML. It has to happen naturally..

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net announcement

This news posting also says "more easier", and should not. I don't have the necessary karma to correct this. S Sterling Hughes wrote: http://www.php.net/: Hereby we would like to kindly ask everyone who published an article or howto about installing PHP on Windows to revise those instructions a

[PHP-DEV] php.net announcement

http://www.php.net/: Hereby we would like to kindly ask everyone who published an article or howto about installing PHP on Windows to revise those instructions according to our latest guide. These new instructions got distributed with PHP 5.0.1 in both the source code and binary versions, and

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

(been laid low for a few days) Wez Furlong wrote: sqlite is compiled statically into PHP 5. I have tried to get SQLite running on PHP5 / Windows but for some reason it's built with links to the PHP4 files. Anybody got a PHP5 version for Windows ? The whole engine? If it is then that is code I can

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

sqlite is compiled statically into PHP 5. > I have tried to get SQLite running on PHP5 / Windows but for some reason > it's built with links to the PHP4 files. > Anybody got a PHP5 version for Windows ? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.ph

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Curt Zirzow wrote: > * Thus wrote Andi Gutmans: > > At 06:59 PM 6/19/2004 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > > > > Sounds good. > > I assume you didn't check the bugs database right? We should check that > > too, and if possible, I suggest we install 5.0.0-dev on php.net as soon as

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

* Thus wrote Andi Gutmans: > At 06:59 PM 6/19/2004 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > > Sounds good. > I assume you didn't check the bugs database right? We should check that > too, and if possible, I suggest we install 5.0.0-dev on php.net as soon as > possible. Can anyone think of other stuff we nee

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

On Tuesday 22 June 2004 15:37, Zeev Suraski wrote: > One thing we could do pretty easily, I guess, is to add something like > v5.php.net, which will be a complete replica of www.php.net, but running on > PHP 5. We're doing something similar with zend.com right now (it actually > runs quite well, e

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

At 14:08 22/06/2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: At 06:59 PM 6/19/2004 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: p.s. Thanks Jan - 15 mins and everything was running fine, so now I just need to sort out how to replace the 'extra' bits. Not done a comprehensive test, but php.net working fine on W2k/Apache2/PHP5 as was

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Andi Gutmans wrote: p.s. Thanks Jan - 15 mins and everything was running fine, so now I just need to sort out how to replace the 'extra' bits. Not done a comprehensive test, but php.net working fine on W2k/Apache2/PHP5 as was probably expected. The fun will come with running an update ;) Sounds

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

At 06:59 PM 6/19/2004 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: p.s. Thanks Jan - 15 mins and everything was running fine, so now I just need to sort out how to replace the 'extra' bits. Not done a comprehensive test, but php.net working fine on W2k/Apache2/PHP5 as was probably expected. The fun will come with

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Lester Caine wrote: > need to sort out how to replace the 'extra' bits. Not done a > comprehensive test, but php.net working fine on W2k/Apache2/PHP5 as was > probably expected. The fun will come with running an update ;) I just set up phpweb on Mac OS X / Apache 1.3 / PHP 5

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Lester Caine wrote: I'm running Eclipse with PHPEclipse and if I need anything other than that then - 'Sorry I can't help' ;) What does an IDE (Eclipse in your case) have to do with running phpweb? Eclipse also has all my code management tools, such as CVS client, and d

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Lester Caine wrote: I'm running Eclipse with PHPEclipse and if I need anything other than that then - 'Sorry I can't help' ;) What does an IDE (Eclipse in your case) have to do with running phpweb? -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Das

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Timm Friebe wrote: Anybody know how to use this script with Eclipse CVS on Windows ? Get cygwin (http://cygwin.com/) or check Google on a Windows version of it (http://www.google.com/search?q=rsync%20Windows). No thanks - I've been there before. I'm running Eclipse with PHPEclipse and if I need any

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Nuno Lopes wrote: You are right. What I meant was more: "Let's test it on Windows, but before we can conclude the website is PHP5 ready, let's test it on the same platform it is already running on". Which raise another question: Is someone hosting a PHP website mirror would be ready to migrate to P

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

> You are right. What I meant was more: "Let's test it on Windows, but > before we can conclude the website is PHP5 ready, let's test it on the > same platform it is already running on". > > Which raise another question: Is someone hosting a PHP website mirror > would be ready to migrate to PHP5? W

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

George Schlossnagle wrote: Why eliminate a testing platform? PHP5 should be tested wherever possible and bugs reported. +1 ;) You are right. What I meant was more: "Let's test it on Windows, but before we can conclude the website is PHP5 ready, let's test it on the same platform it is already r

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Hi, I did the rsync for Lester and put up an archive for him to download, excluding extra/ distributions/ and manual/ I sent him the URL to the archive in a private mail, if anyone else is interested, please drop me a note. Jan -- GPG Key: BB96 56B0 Q: Thank Jan? - A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.n

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

On Jun 19, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Olivier Hill wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Anybody know how to use this script with Eclipse CVS on Windows ? rsync has nothing to do with CVS. Try getting a Windows client of rsync. On the other hand, since the PHP website is running on UNIX, I don't think it should be

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Lester Caine wrote: Anybody know how to use this script with Eclipse CVS on Windows ? rsync has nothing to do with CVS. Try getting a Windows client of rsync. On the other hand, since the PHP website is running on UNIX, I don't think it should be tested on Windows. We have recently seen bugs with

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 19:00, Lester Caine wrote: > Timm Friebe wrote: [...] > Anybody know how to use this script with Eclipse CVS on Windows ? Get cygwin (http://cygwin.com/) or check Google on a Windows version of it (http://www.google.com/search?q=rsync%20Windows). - Timm -- PHP Internals -

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Timm Friebe wrote: On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:37, Lester Caine wrote: Timm Friebe wrote: [...] Use rsync: -- snip rsync.sh from our php.net mirror -- #!/bin/sh base="/home/httpd/php3.de" /usr/local/bin/rsync -avzC --delete --delete-after rsync.php.net::phpweb $base/doc_root >/dev/null -- /snip -- And

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:37, Lester Caine wrote: > Timm Friebe wrote: [...] > > Use rsync: > > > > -- snip rsync.sh from our php.net mirror -- > > #!/bin/sh > > > > base="/home/httpd/php3.de" > > /usr/local/bin/rsync -avzC --delete --delete-after rsync.php.net::phpweb > > $base/doc_root >/dev/nul

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Timm Friebe wrote: Hello Lester, On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:22, Lester Caine wrote: OK I've downloaded phpweb and tried to run it on PHP5, but have fallen at the first hurdle. index.php calls for include/pregen-events.inc but I can't see that on the CVS - where am I going wrong :) Use rsync: -- sn

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

Hello Lester, On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:22, Lester Caine wrote: > OK I've downloaded phpweb and tried to run it on PHP5, but have fallen > at the first hurdle. > > index.php calls for > include/pregen-events.inc > but I can't see that on the CVS - where am I going wrong :) Use rsync: -- snip rs

[PHP-DEV] php.net on PHP5

OK I've downloaded phpweb and tried to run it on PHP5, but have fallen at the first hurdle. index.php calls for include/pregen-events.inc but I can't see that on the CVS - where am I going wrong :) Second problem - it seems to be hard coded to be the root web directory, is that the same in PHP4?

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net

On Fri, 21 May 2004, Aidan Lister wrote: > Look harder! I've sent three with the subject "master.php.net". > I've also asked 2 other people with the same problem to mail in, although > it's possible they didn't. I did send you another mail after, please cease to post to the internals list about i

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net

Hi Dan, Yep, ofcourse! I sent a lot of debug information in my mail to systems, I'll repaste it here: --- Hi, I'm trying to log into http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php with my CVS username and password. I've checked and rechecked my CVS details, and used them to successfu

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.net

Hi Aidan: On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 07:36:56PM +1000, Aidan Lister wrote: > > I'm unable to access any of the pages on master.php.net/manage; my > username/password simply does not work You have cookies enabled for that domain, correct? --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O

  1   2   >